UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrantx
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨
Check the appropriate box:
Filed by the Registrant ☒ | |
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ | |
Check the appropriate box: | |
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ | Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
SpartanNash Company
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply): | |
☒ | No fee required. |
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
☐ | Fee computed on table |
2024 Proxy Statement |
NOTICE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING |
OF SHAREHOLDERS |
Dear SpartanNash Shareholder, |
|
The Board of Directors and I are pleased with SpartanNash’s execution of its long-term strategic plan. Since launching the plan in 2021, SpartanNash has built upon its highly scalable business model, grown topline, and captured margin-enhancing benefits through its Supply Chain and Merchandising Transformation initiatives.
Over the past year, the grocery industry has faced significant headwinds, including multiple categories that have experienced mid-single-digit unit volume declines. Despite a very challenging macroeconomic environment, the Company continued to execute on its plan, which has driven results.
The results can be seen throughout the entire organization – with an industry-leading safety incident rate, reduced Associate turnover, increased Retail market share and a better value proposition as a result of the store banner strategy. Wholesale customers are also benefiting from this transformation with higher fill rates and a rigorous enhanced category planning process, which was the first phase of the ongoing Merchandising Transformation.
We remain focused on ensuring we have a well-rounded Board, with diverse backgrounds and experiences to best support the Company’s future growth and strategic plan. In 2023, we welcomed two new independent directors who bring relevant business and leadership experience, as well as financial acumen. We will continue to keep Board refreshment a priority. On behalf of the SpartanNash Board of Directors, I also take this opportunity to recognize Maj. Gen. (Ret.) Hawthorne L. Proctor and William R. Voss for their dedication and years of service to the Board.
I would like to thank all SpartanNash Associates, whose hard work and dedication have been critical to the success of Our Winning RecipeTM. I would also like to extend my sincere thanks to you, our investors, for your support of the Board and Executive Leadership Team.
SpartanNash has a clear strategic plan that continues to unlock shareholder value.
Thank you for your investment in SpartanNash.
With gratitude,
Douglas A. Hacker
Chairman of the Board of Directors
1 |
|
Dear SpartanNash Shareholder, |
|
Since I joined SpartanNash in late 2020, we’ve focused much of our effort on our Core Capability of People. This includes investments in our People First culture and how we communicate with, celebrate and engage our Associates – and 2023 was no different. Last year, we also continued to invest our time and talent into another Core Capability – Operational Excellence – and the importance of Flying in Formation. Flying in Formation is the joy of coordinated execution, and it is built on the foundation that all Associates communicate and trust each other.
Flying in Formation during 2023 enabled us to make meaningful progress on our key initiatives, enhancing the value and service we provide to our customers and capturing new cost savings along the way. These activities helped us gain share, improve margins, drive results, and increase shareholder value.
I’m proud to share our 2023 highlights:
These results tell a compelling story about SpartanNash’s continued transformation and the power of Flying in Formation.
I am very energized about the future of SpartanNash. The continued success our long-term strategic plan has enabled us to steadily grow profitability, despite a dynamic and changing environment. The plan has also provided a strong foundation to pursue both organic and inorganic opportunities.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, our Executive Leadership Team, and our Associates, I thank you for your continued support and investment in SpartanNash.
Glad to be here,
Tony Bashir Sarsam
President and Chief Executive Officer
(1) A reconciliation of net earnings to adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, and a calculation of adjusted EBITDA margin is provided in Appendix A.
(2) Composed of $18.6 million in share repurchases and $29.7 million in dividends.
(3) The Company’s total turnover rate improvement year-over-year as of year-end 2023.
(4) Retail market share is total Retail segment sales divided by the total addressable Retail market. The total addressable Retail market is determined based on first-party research around the footprints of each Retail store, validated with NielsenIQ market data and the U.S. Bureau of Labor food expenditures.
(5) Case volume shipped per labor hour utilized. Management uses the throughput rate as a means of evaluating warehouse efficiency.
2 |
|
Forward-Looking Statements
The matters discussed in this letter and in the SpartanNash Company (the "Company") proxy statement include "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"), about the plans, strategies, objectives, goals or expectations of the Company, including those pertaining to the Company's environmental, social, and governance ("ESG") performance, goals and initiatives. These forward-looking statements may be identifiable by words or phrases indicating that the Company or management "expects," "projects," "anticipates," "plans," "believes," "intends," or "estimates," or that a particular occurrence or event "may," "could," "should," "will" or "will likely" result, occur or be pursued or "continue" in the future, that the "outlook," "trend," "guidance" or "target" is toward a particular result or occurrence, that a development is an "opportunity," "priority," "strategy," "focus," that the Company is "positioned" for a particular result, or similarly stated expectations. Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which, with respect to future business decisions, are subject to change. These uncertainties and contingencies may affect actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially. These risks and uncertainties include the Company's ability to compete in an extremely competitive industry; the Company's dependence on certain major customers; the Company's ability to implement its growth strategy and transformation initiatives; the Company's ability to implement its growth strategy through acquisitions and successfully integrate acquired businesses; disruptions to the Company's information security network, including security breaches and cyber-attacks; impacts to the availability and performance of the Company's information technology systems; changes in relationships with the Company's vendor base; changes in product availability and product pricing from vendors; macroeconomic uncertainty, including rising inflation, potential economic recession, and increasing interest rates; difficulty attracting and retaining well-qualified Associates and effectively managing increased labor costs; failure to successfully retain or manage transitions with executive leaders and other key personnel; impacts to the Company's business and reputation due to an increasing focus on environmental, social and governance matters; customers to whom the Company extends credit or for whom the Company guarantees loans may fail to repay the Company; changes in the geopolitical conditions; disruptions associated with severe weather conditions and natural disasters, including effects from climate change; disruptions associated with disease outbreaks; the Company's ability to manage its private brand program for U.S. military commissaries, including the termination of the program or not achieving the desired results; impairment charges for goodwill or other long-lived assets; the Company's level of indebtedness; interest rate fluctuations; the Company's ability to service its debt and to comply with debt covenants; changes in government regulations; labor relations issues; changes in the military commissary system, including its supply chain, or in the level of governmental funding; product recalls and other product-related safety concerns; cost increases related to multi-employer pension plans; and other risks and uncertainties listed under "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and in subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements related to our ESG performance, goals and initiatives are subject to additional risks and uncertainties, including regarding gathering and verification of information and related methodological considerations; our ability to implement various initiatives under expected timeframes, cost, and complexity; our dependency on third-parties to provide certain information and to comply with applicable laws and policies; and other unforeseen events or conditions. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company or that the Company currently believes are immaterial also may impair its business, operations, liquidity, financial condition and prospects. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise its forward-looking statements to reflect developments that occur or information obtained after the date of this letter or proxy statement.
3 |
|
| SpartanNash Company 850 76th Street, S.W. P.O. Box 8700 Grand Rapids, Michigan
|
April 19, 2016
Dear Shareholder:
The 20162024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (including any adjournments, postponements, or continuations thereof, the “Annual Meeting”) of SpartanNash Company will(the “Company”) is scheduled to be held virtually on Wednesday, June 2, 2016,May 22, 2024, at the JW Marriott Hotel, 235 Louis Street NW, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, beginning at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time.
The following pages contain the formal notice of meeting and proxy statement describing the matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to read the proxy statement carefully. Securities and Exchange Commission rules allow us to furnish our proxy statement and annual report to our shareholders on the Internet. We are pleased to take advantage of these rules and believe that they enable us to provide our shareholders with the information that they need, while lowering the cost of delivery and reducing the environmental impact of the documents related to our Annual Meeting.
As part of our continuing efforts to streamline the annual meeting, we will not report on our results of operations at the meeting. We encourage shareholders to visit the Investor Relations section of our website, www.spartannash.com, for information about our business and results of operations.
The annual meeting will be webcast live. Anyone may access the webcast by visiting the “Investor Relations” section of our website, www.spartannash.com, and following the links to the live webcast. It is important that your shares be represented at the annual meeting, regardless of how many shares you own.Please vote your shares using any of the means described in our proxy statement. Regardless of whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, voting your shares prior to the meeting will not affect your right to vote in person if you attend.
Please note that attendance will be limited to shareholders of the Company and the holders of shareholder proxies. If you are a shareholder of record, you must bring the admission ticket attached to your proxy card or your notice of availability of proxy materials to be admitted to the meeting. “Street name” shareholders must present a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting stock ownership as of April 5, 2016. For all attendees, admission to the meeting will require presentation of a valid driver’s license or other federal or state issued photo identification.
Sincerely,
Dennis Eidson
President and Chief Executive Officer
Your vote is important. Even if you plan to attend the meeting,
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD PROMPTLY OR
VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET.
SPARTANNASH COMPANY
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To our shareholders:
The 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of SpartanNash Company will be held at the JW Marriott Hotel, 235 Louis Street NW, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, on Wednesday, June 2, 2016, at 9:10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. At the meeting,Annual Meeting, we will consider and vote on:on the matters listed below.
MEETING DETAILS
|
|
|
|
Meeting Date | Meeting Time | Record Date | Location |
May 22, 2024 | 10:00 a.m. E.D.T. | The | Via live webcast at https://www.cesonlineservices.com/sptn24_vm |
VOTING MATTERS
1 | Election of the eight directors |
2 | Advisory approval of the Company’s named executive |
3 | Approval of the SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan; |
4 | Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as accounting firm for the |
5 | Shareholder proposal regarding a simple majority vote, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; |
6 | Shareholder proposal regarding animal welfare, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and |
7 | Any other business that may properly come before the meeting, and any adjournment, postponement or continuation of the meeting. |
Record date:
The foregoing items are described more fully in the accompanying proxy statement.
Only shareholders of record of the Company’s common stock as of the close of business on March 27, 2024, or their duly designated proxies, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Such shareholders are urged to submit a proxy card, even if their shares were sold after such date.
4 |
|
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
The 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will once again be held in a virtual format to provide a safe experience for our shareholders and Associates. The Annual Meeting will be held online via a live webcast at https://www.cesonlineservices.com/sptn24_vm. You may vote if you were a shareholderonly participate in the virtual meeting by registering in advance at https://www.cesonlineservices.com/sptn24_vm prior to the deadline of record10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on April 5, 2016.
If you plan to attend the meeting:Attendance is limited to shareholders of the Company, the holders of shareholder proxies and invited guests. You will be asked to present a valid driver’s license or other federal- or state-issued photo identification. If you are a shareholder of record, you must bring the admission ticket attached toMay 21, 2024. Please have your voting instruction form, proxy card or other communication containing your notice of availability of proxy materialscontrol number available and follow the instructions to be admittedcomplete your registration request. Upon completing registration, participants will receive further instructions via email, including unique links that will allow them to access the meeting. “Street name” shareholders must bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting stock ownership as of Annual Meeting and will permit them to submit questions during the Annual Meeting.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Ileana McAlary
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer
and Corporate Secretary
April 5, 2016.10, 2024
Your vote is important to us. PLEASE VOTE PROMPTLY ONLINE, BY PHONE, OR BY MAIL, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING. Voting your shares prior to the meeting will not affect your right to attend or vote at the meeting. See the information under “Questions and Answers about the Proxy Materials and our Annual Meeting” regarding how to vote. If you have any questions about how to vote your shares, please call the firm assisting us with the solicitation of proxies, Morrow Sodali LLC, at the contact listed below. M O R R O W S O D A L I 509 Madison Avenue Suite 1206 New York, NY 10022 Shareholders Call Toll Free: (800) 662-5200 Banks, Brokers, Trustees and Other Nominees Call Collect: (203) 658-9400 |
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials: SpartanNash’s Proxy StatementMaterials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 22, 2024: The Company’s proxy statement and annual report to Shareholdersshareholders for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016December 30, 2023, are currently available for viewing via the Internetonline at www.edocumentview.com/SPTN.
In addition, you may obtain electronic copies of all of our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in the “Investor Relations” section of our website, www.spartannash.com, by clicking the “SEC Filings” link.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Kathleen M. Mahoney
Executive Vice President Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
April 19, 2016
www.proxyvote.com.
Your vote is important. Even if you plan to attend the meeting, PLEASE VOTE PROMPTLY BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET, OR BY SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING A PROXY CARD. See the information in the “Questions and Answers” section of our proxy statement regarding how to vote by telephone or internet, obtain a printed proxy card, revoke a proxy, and vote in person.
5 |
|
7 | ||||
14 | ||||
15 | ||||
16 | ||||
26 | ||||
27 | ||||
29 | ||||
32 | ||||
42 | ||||
55 | ||||
56 | ||||
57 | ||||
58 | ||||
60 | ||||
60 | ||||
75 | ||||
76 | ||||
78 | ||||
80 | ||||
81 | ||||
| 81 | |||
81 | ||||
82 | ||||
82 | ||||
85 | ||||
85 | ||||
86 | ||||
90 | ||||
92 | ||||
Delinquent Section 16(a) | 92 | |||
Shareholder Proposals and Nominations for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | 93 | |||
| 94 | |||
100 | ||||
102 | ||||
103 |
In this proxy statement, we refer to SpartanNash Company as “SpartanNash,” the “Company,” “we,” and “us,” the Company’s Board of Directors as the “Board” and the Company’s 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, including any adjournments, postponements, or continuations thereof, as the “Annual Meeting.” We refer to the fiscal year ending December 28, 2024 as “fiscal 2024,” the fiscal year ended December 30, 2023 as “fiscal 2023,” the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 as “fiscal 2022,” and the fiscal year ended January 1, 2022 as “fiscal 2021,” and references to a “year” made in connection with our financial information or operating results are to the fiscal year, unless otherwise stated.
6 |
|
On or about April 10, 2024, this proxy statement, the Company’s annual report to shareholders for fiscal 2023, and a proxy card were first mailed to our shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD JUNE 2, 2016
PROXY STATEMENT
Dated April 19, 2016
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider. You should carefully read thethis entire proxy statement and the Company’s annual report on Form 10-Kto shareholders for fiscal 2023 before voting. We refer to the year ended January 2, 2016 as “fiscal 2015” and the fiscal year ended January 3, 2015 as “fiscal 2014.”
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
|
|
| Meeting Time |
| Location |
| 10:00 a.m. E.D.T. |
| |
|
| ||
|
| Via live webcast at https://www.cesonlineservices.com/sptn24_vm |
WAYS TO VOTE
|
|
| |
Internet | Phone | ||
Mark, sign and date yourproxy card and return it in the | www.proxyvote.com | 1-800-690-6903 |
REGISTRATION AND ADMISSION
The Annual Meeting will be held online via a live webcast at https://www.cesonlineservices.com/sptn24_vm. In order to attend the Annual Meeting virtually via the Internet, participants must register at https://www.cesonlineservices.com/sptn24_vm prior to the registration deadline of 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 21, 2024. Please have your voting instruction form, proxy card or other communication containing your control number available and follow the instructions to complete your registration request. Upon completing registration, participants will receive further instructions via email.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Please vote promptly online, by phone, or by mail, regardless of whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. Voting your shares prior to the meeting will not affect your right to attend or vote at the meeting.
7 |
|
Proxy Summary
MEETING AGENDA AND BOARD VOTING RECOMMENDATION
1 | Election of the eight directors named in this proxy statement to 2025 Annual Meeting of successors shall have been elected and qualified | “FOR” each of the | |
2 | Advisory vote to approve the Company’s named executive officer compensation | “FOR” | |
|
| “FOR” | |
4 | Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent certified public accounting firm for fiscal 2024 | “FOR” | |
5 | Shareholder proposal regarding simple majority vote, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting | “AGAINST” | |
6 | Shareholder proposal regarding animal welfare, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting | “AGAINST” |
Meeting Agenda
Election of ten directors.
Advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement.
Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.
TransactWe will also transact any other business that may properly come before the meeting.
Voting Mattersmeeting, and Vote Recommendations
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the election of each nominee and FOR the approval of eachany adjournment, postponement, or continuation of the other proposals described in this proxy statement.meeting.
Quorum and Vote Required
8 |
|
Proxy Summary
To conduct business at the annual meeting, a quorum of shareholders must be present. The presence in person or by properly executed proxy of the holders
OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES
Our Board consists of a majoritydiverse group of all issuedhighly experienced and outstanding shares of SpartanNash common stock entitled to vote at the meeting is necessary for a quorum. To determine whether a quorum is present, we will include shares that are present or represented by proxy, including abstentions and shares represented by a broker non-vote on any matter.
PROXY SUMMARY (cont’d)
A plurality of the shares voting is required to elect directors. This means that, if there are more nominees than positions to be filled, the nominees who receive the most votes will be elected to the open director positions. Abstentions, broker non-votes and other shares that are not votedaccomplished leaders in person or by proxy will not be included in the vote count to determine if a plurality of shares voted in favor of each nominee. As discussed on page 14 under “Majority Voting,” a director-nominee receiving a greater number of votes “withheld” than votes “for” election is required to offer promptly his or her resignation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee upon certification of the shareholder vote.
The other proposals set forth in this proxy statement will be approved if a majority of the shares that are voted on the proposal at the meeting are voted in favor of approval. Abstentions, broker non-votes and other shares that are not voted on a proposal in person or by proxy will not be included in the vote count to determine if a majority of shares voted on the proposal voted in favor of approval.
We do not know of any other matters to be presented at the meeting. Generally, any other proposal to be voted on at the meeting would be approved if a majority of the shares that are voted on the proposal at the meeting are voted in favor of the proposal. Abstentions, broker non-votes and other shares that are not voted on the proposal in person or by proxy would not be included in the vote count to determine if a majority of shares voted on the proposal voted in favor of each such proposal.
PROXY SUMMARY (cont’d)
Board Nominees
their respective fields. The following table providesand charts provide summary information about the Board’s director nominees standing for election at the Annual Meeting, each of whom is currently a member of the Board. Detailed information about each director who is nominated for election to serve a termnominee’s background, skill set, and areas of one year. Each director nominee is a current director and, during fiscal 2015, attended at least 95%experience can be found within the "Board of the meetingsDirectors" section of the Board and each committee on which he or she was a member. Each director has been a director of the Company since the merger between Spartan Stores, Inc. and Nash-Finch Company on November 19, 2013 (the “Merger”) and was a director of Spartan Stores or Nash Finch before the Merger. Craig C. Sturken, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, will conclude his service at the annual meeting and is not standing for re-election.this proxy statement.
|
|
|
| Committee Memberships | Membership on other Public Company Boards | ||
Name | Age | Independent | Occupation | AC | CC | NCGC |
|
M. Shân Atkins | 67 |
| Independent Business Executive and Retired Retail and Consumer Executive | C, F | M |
| 1 |
Fred Bentley, Jr. | 58 |
| President and Chief Executive Officer of DexKo Global, Inc. | M | M |
|
|
Douglas A. Hacker | 68 |
| Chairman of the Board, Independent Business Executive and Retired Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President Strategy of UAL Corp. |
|
|
| 1 |
Kerrie D. MacPherson | 65 |
| Retired Senior Partner of Ernst & Young, LLP | M, F |
| M | 1 |
Julien R. Mininberg | 59 |
| Independent Business Executive and Former Chief Executive Officer of Helen of Troy Limited |
| M | M |
|
Jaymin B. Patel | 56 |
| Executive Chairman of Perennial Climate, Inc. | M, F |
| C | 2 |
Pamela S. Puryear, Ph.D. | 60 |
| Independent Business Executive and Former Chief Human Resources Officer in Retail and Healthcare |
| C | M | 1 |
Tony B. Sarsam | 62 |
| President and Chief Executive Officer of SpartanNash |
|
|
| 1 |
AC | Audit Committee |
| C | Chair | ||||||
CC | Compensation Committee | M | Member | |||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||
| ||||||
| Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | F | Financial Expert |
|
9 |
|
PROXY SUMMARY (cont’d)Proxy Summary
Corporate Governance Highlights
1 Presents the approximate average tenure for all director nominees as of April 1, 2024 measured since the 2013 merger of Nash-Finch Company (“Nash Finch”) and Spartan Stores, Inc. (“Spartan Stores”). See “Board Tenure” within the "Board of Directors" section of this proxy statement for more information about the tenure of our director nominees.
10 |
|
Proxy Summary
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
The Board believes that effective corporate governance should reinforce a culture of corporate integrity, foster the Company’s pursuit of profitable growth, and ensure quality and continuity of corporate leadership. Highlights of our governance practices include:
| Annual election of all directors |
| Policy against director overboarding |
| ||||||
| Any director who receives more “withheld” votes than “for” votes in an uncontested election must offer his or her resignation Simple majority vote required for all voting matters except for bylaws amendment |
| Clawback policy for the recovery of incentive compensation from Vice Presidents and above, including due to inaccurate metrics (not resulting in a material restatement) or for misconduct | |||
| Independent Chairman of the Board |
| All directors except the CEO are independent | |||
| Robust stock ownership policy for directors |
and officers
|
|
Policy against hedging and pledging of our securities |
|
|
|
Board reflects |
| Annual advisory vote on named executive officer compensation | ||||
| Annual Board and Committee evaluations, or peer evaluations of directors |
| Director orientation and continuing education programs | |||
| Strong Board oversight of Enterprise Risk Management |
| Commitment to ongoing Board refreshment and diversity | |||
| Annual evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Leadership Team |
| Formal ESG oversight by all three Committees |
|
Recent Changes
In 2015, we removed all supermajority voting requirements from our Articles of Incorporation. All matters to be decided by our shareholders will be decided by a simple majority vote, unless otherwise required by the Michigan Business Corporation Act.OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
Executive Compensation Advisory Vote
In 2011, the Company’s shareholders voted to hold advisory votes on executive compensation on an annual basis. The next shareholder advisory vote on the frequency of shareholder say-on-pay votes is expected to occur in 2017.
We are asking our shareholders to approve on an advisory basis our named executive officer compensation for fiscal 2015. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on our executive compensation. The Board recommends a FOR vote because it believes that our compensation policies and practices are effective in achieving the Company’s goal of attracting, motivating, rewarding and retaining the senior management talent required to achieve our corporate objectives and increase shareholder value through long-term profitable growth. The Board believes that executive compensation is appropriately tied to corporate performance as nearly 80%and recommends that shareholders vote in favor of the say-on-pay proposal. As part of the ongoing review of its executive compensation practices and to further align to shareholder interests, the Compensation Committee has made changes to the 2023 Long Term Incentive awards to further align executive performance with shareholder interests. These changes include three year performance periods and a greater focus on individual awards moving from performance cash incentives to performance share units incentive payouts.
SHAREHOLDER OUTREACH
Throughout 2022 and 2023, the Company significantly advanced its efforts with respect to investor transparency and outreach. These outreach efforts resulted in more than 50 investor interactions with members of the Executive Leadership Team throughout 2023.
The increase in active investor engagement has enabled the Company to further share progress on Our Winning Recipe, strategic direction and the individual elements of the transformational initiatives that are underway.
The Company is committed to having continuous shareholder outreach to further develop its relationships with current and prospective investors. To coordinate a meeting, please reach out to SpartanNash Investor Relations via email at IR@spartannash.com.
The Board believes that Company management should proactively seek productive dialogue with its shareholders. Detailed information about how shareholders can communicate with members of the Board can be found under "Shareholder Communications with Directors" within the "Corporate Governance" section of this proxy statement.
11 |
|
Proxy Summary
2023 ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
In 2023, we issued our 2022 Environmental Social and Governance ("ESG") Report, which provides an update on our progress with key ESG initiatives. The report showcased our long-term ESG goals, the results of our CEO’s 2015 target total direct compensation (salary, annual bonus opportunity,materiality assessment, insights on the Company’s expansion of sustainability initiatives, and long-term incentive opportunity)continued focus on a People First culture.
Our work in ESG is at-risk,an ongoing journey. With that in mind, we will provide periodic updates on our corporate website, annually in our proxy statements, and our other named executive officers have nearly 65% of their 2015 target total direct compensation at risk.
Business Context
In fiscal 2015, we delivered another year of earnings growthbiennially in a challenging environment. Key accomplishments included:comprehensive report.
Increased earnings per share;
Significant increase in cash flow from operations;
PROXY SUMMARY (cont’d)
Reduced long-term debt;The Company and
Increased Board believe responsibility and accountability for ESG must lie within every function of the dividend rate.
Fiscal 2015 Chief Executive Officer Compensationorganization. The Board’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is formally tasked with overseeing the Company’s ESG framework, which includes our ESG Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also oversees our efforts to promote diversity and inclusion at all levels of the organization, including for the Board.
For fiscal 2015,The Board’s Compensation Committee has oversight of human capital management, and the Board approvedBoard’s Audit Committee oversees the following changesimplementation of appropriate controls to ensure the accuracy of ESG data collection and disclosures, as well as information and cybersecurity, ethics reporting and regulatory compliance.
We have three subcommittees within our CEO’s compensation:
Mr. Eidson’s equity incentive compensationESG Committee – the Environmental Committee, Social Committee, and long-term cash incentive compensation opportunity (atGovernance Committee – to thoroughly manage the target level) were increasedprocesses to successfully implement initiatives and achieve our goals. The ESG Committee is overseen by 20% overfour executive chairs – the prior year to move his compensation closer to the median level for CEO’s at similar companies.
No change was made to Mr. Eidson’s annual incentive opportunity as a percentage of his salary.
Mr. Eidson received a 3% increase in base salary.
Executive Compensation Highlights
Annual Cash Incentive. The Company’s adjusted consolidated net earnings performance was approximately 98% of target, resulting in a payout of 92% of target annual cash incentive for awards based on corporate performance.
Long Term Cash Incentive. The Company’s Adjusted EPS, net sales, and merger synergies performance for fiscal 2015 was 99%, 95%, and 153% of target, respectively. As a result, our named executive officers (other than Ms. Mahoney, who joined the Company after the award was made) earned a long-term cash incentive award at 93%, 75%, and 200% of target, respectively, for those metrics.
Promotion of David Staples. In March 2015, Mr. Staples was promoted to Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer. In conjunction with this promotion, Mr. Staples received a base salary increase of 20%, and a 42% increase in his long-term cash and equity incentive compensation at the target level.
Promotion of Derek Jones. Mr. Jones was promoted to Executive Vice President, President of Wholesale and Distribution Operations in March 2015. Mr. Jones received a base salary increase of 19%, and his annual cash incentive opportunity at the target level was increased by 15% from 55% of salary to 70% of salary. Mr. Jones also received a 28% increase in his long-term cash and equity compensation opportunity at the target level. Mr. Jones received an additional grant of restricted stock having a grant date fair value of approximately $450,000 which will be subject to a five-year service condition and will vest in full (“cliff vest”) on March 1, 2020.
Promotion of Kathleen Mahoney and other compensation actions. Ms. Mahoney was promoted to Chief Legal Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer, Chief Supply Chain Officer, and Senior Vice President, Communications. The ESG Committee provides periodic updates to the Board.
12 |
|
Proxy Summary
2025 ESG Goals
We established long-term ESG goals for SpartanNash based on insights from a third-party materiality assessment conducted in November 2015. In conjunction with this promotion, Ms. Mahoney received a salary increase of 12%. Ms. Mahoney also earned a retention bonus on the second anniversary2022. The timeframe of the merger. Mr. Adornato and Ms. Mahoney each received an 8% increase in long-term cash and equity incentive compensation at the target level.
Who may attend the meeting
Onlygoals was established to align with the Company’s shareholders, their duly-appointed proxieslong-range plan, from January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2025. It was determined that goal progress would be measured against a 2021 baseline. These goals have been strategically placed into the Company’s Master Action Plan to ensure they are embedded in our corporate identity and invited guestsstrategy. The table below reflects progress made in 2023 on our 2025 ESG goals:
Additional Information
Our 2023 ESG updates are available within the "Corporate Governance" section of this proxy statement. Please note that our discussion of ESG matters, despite references to a "materiality assessment," may attendinclude information that is not necessarily "material" under the meeting. If youfederal securities laws for SEC reporting purposes. For many ESG matters, "materiality" is informed by various ESG standards and frameworks (including standards for the measurement of underlying data), and the interests of various stakeholders. Much of this information is subject to assumptions, estimates or third-party information that is still evolving and subject to change. In addition, while we believe all of our ESG goals align with our long-term growth strategy and financial and operational priorities, they are a shareholder of record, you must bring the admission ticket attached to your proxy card or your notice of availability of proxy materials to be admitted to the meeting. “Street name” shareholders must bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting stock ownership as of April 5, 2016. All attendees must present a valid driver’s license or other federal or state issued photo identification.
Whoaspirational and may vote
You may vote at the annual meeting if you were a shareholder of record of SpartanNash common stock at the close of business on April 5, 2016. Each shareholder is entitled to one vote per share of SpartanNash common stock on each matter presented for a shareholder vote at the meeting. As of April 5, 2016, there were 37,504,754 shares of SpartanNash common stock outstanding.
How to vote
Registered Holders: If you are a registered shareholder (i.e., you own your shares directly and not through a broker or bank), SpartanNash offers you the convenience of voting through the Internet or by telephone, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You may also vote by mail.
Internet Voting. You may vote via the Internet by visiting www.envisionreports.com/SPTN. You may navigate to the online voting site by clicking the “Cast Your Vote” button. Have the instructions attached to your proxy card ready when you access the site and follow the prompts to record your vote. This vote will be counted immediatelychange, and there is no need to send in your proxy card. Votes cast by Internet must be received by 1:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on June 2, 2016.
Telephone Voting. To vote by telephone, dial the toll-free number on the instructions attached to your proxy card and listen for further directions. You must have a touch-tone phone. Telephonic votesguarantee or promise that they will be counted immediately and there is no need to send in your proxy card. Votes cast by telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on June 2, 2016.met or that they will not hinder financial or operational performance.
13 |
|
Voting by Mail. You may request a printed copy of your proxy card. If you properly sign and return
Upon the proxy card to the designated address, the shares represented by that proxy card will be voted at the annual meeting and at any adjournmentrecommendation of the meeting. Votes cast by mail must be received no later thanNominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the start ofBoard has nominated the meeting.
If you specify a choice on the proxy card that you returnfollowing eight directors for voting, your shares will be voted as specified. If you do not specify a choice, your shares will be voted for election of each of the nominees named in this proxy statement, and for each of the proposals described in this proxy statement. If any other matter comes before the meeting, your shares will be voted in the discretion of the persons named as proxies on the proxy card.
Street Name Holders: You hold your shares in “street name” if your shares are registered in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee (which we will collectively reference as your “broker”). If you hold your shares in street name, then your broker must vote your street name shares in the manner you direct if you provide your broker with proper and timely voting instructions.PLEASE USE THE VOTING FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED BY YOUR BROKER OR ITS AGENT.Theseforms and instructions typically permit you to give voting instructions by telephone or Internet, using a number or Internet address provided by the broker.You will NOT be able to vote street name shares using the internet address or telephone numbers established for
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING (cont’d)
registered shareholders as described in the prior Question and Answer. If you are a street name holder and later want to change your vote, you must contact your broker.
Please note that you may NOT vote shares held in street name in person at the annual meeting unless you request and receive a valid proxy from your broker.
Failure to Vote
If you are a registered shareholder (i.e., you own your shares directly and not through a broker or bank) and you do not cast your vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the items of business at the Annual Meeting.
If you hold your shares in street name and do not provide timely voting instructions to your broker or bank, then your broker or bank may vote your shares only on “routine” matters, such as Biographical information concerning the ratification of the Company’s independent public accounting firm. NYSE rules applicable to its member firms provide that your broker may not vote uninstructed shares on a discretionary basis on non-routine matters, such as the election of directors or approval of the executive compensation proposal. In such cases, the broker can register your shares as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, but will not be able to vote on non-routine matters. This is called a “broker non-vote.”
Revoking a Proxy
You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the meeting by taking any of the following four actions:
by delivering written notice of revocation to the Company’s Secretary, 850 76th Street, S.W., P.O. Box 8700, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49518-8700;
by delivering a proxy card bearing a later date than the proxy that you wish to revoke;
by casting a subsequent vote via telephone or the Internet, as described above; or
by attending the meeting and voting in person.
Merely attending the meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy; you must cast a subsequent vote at the meeting using forms provided for that purpose. Your last valid vote that we receive before or at the annual meeting is the vote that will be counted.
Adjournment
The shareholders present at the meeting, in person or by proxy, may, by a majority vote, adjourn the meeting despite the absence of a quorum. Shares represented by proxy may be voted in the discretion of the proxy holder on a proposal to adjourn the meeting. If a quorum is not present at the meeting, we expect the Chairman of the Board to adjourn the meeting to solicit additional proxies, as is authorizeddirector nominees appears below under the Company’s Bylaws. In addition, the Chairman may adjourn the meeting in the eventheading “Board of disorder or under other circumstances consistent with the Company’s bylaws and rules of conduct for the annual meeting.Directors.”
Multiple Proxies/Instruction Cards
If you receive more than one proxy statement and instruction card,your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. Please provide voting instructions for all proxy and voting instruction cards you receive.
Meeting Results
Weelected, each nominee will announce preliminary voting results at the annual meeting and publish final results in a current report on Form 8-K within four business days after the annual meeting.
The Board of Directors proposes that the following ten individuals be elected as directors of SpartanNashhold office for a one-year term expiring at the 20172025 annual meeting of shareholders:
M. Shân Atkins
Dennis Eidson
Mickey P. Foret
Frank M. Gambino
Douglas A. Hacker
Yvonne R. Jackson
Elizabeth A. Nickels
Timothy J. O’Donovan
Hawthorne L. Proctor
William R. Voss
Biographical information concerning the nominees appears below under the heading “The Board of Directors.” The persons named as proxies on the proxy card intend to vote for the election of each of the nominees. The proposed nominees are willing to beshareholders. Each director will hold office until his or her successor is elected and to serve as directors. qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation, or removal.
M. Shân Atkins | Kerrie D. MacPherson | Pamela S. Puryear, Ph.D. |
Fred Bentley, Jr. | Julien R. Mininberg | Tony B. Sarsam |
Douglas A. Hacker | Jaymin B. Patel |
If any nominee becomes unable to serve or is otherwise unavailable for election, which we do not anticipate, the incumbent Board of Directors may select a substitute nominee. If a substitute nominee is selected, the shares represented by your properly executed proxy card will be voted for the election of the substitute nominee, unless you give other instructions. If a substitute is not selected, all properly executed proxies will be voted for the election of the remaining nominees. Proxies will not be voted for more than teneight nominees.
Your Board of Directors recommends that you voteFOR election of all nominees as directors.
| The Board unanimously recommends that you vote FOR each of the Board’s nominees to be elected as directors. |
14 |
|
As required under Section 14A of
Shareholders have the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, shareholders mayopportunity to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules.rules of the SEC. This advisory vote, which is commonly referred to as the “say-on-pay” vote, is being held pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act.
As described in more detail in the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement, the Company has designed its executive compensation programs to attract, motivate, reward and retain the senior management talent to manage the Company to achieve our corporate objectives and increase shareholder value through long-term profitable growth. OurWe believe our compensation programs are focused on pay-for-performance principles and are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders. For these reasons, and the reasons discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, we are asking our shareholders to vote “FOR” the adoption of the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of SpartanNash Company (the “Company”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting2024 annual meeting of Shareholdersshareholders under the heading entitled “Executive Compensation.‘Executive Compensation,’ is hereby approved.”
This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy and programs described in this proxy statement.
The vote is not binding on the Company, the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee. However, the Board of Directors and Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and will take the results of the vote into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.
Your
| The Board unanimously recommends that you vote FOR advisory approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. |
15 |
|
Background and Purpose of the SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
On March 6, 2024, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board approved the SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2024 Stock Plan”), subject to shareholder approval at the 2024 Annual Meeting. The 2024 Stock Plan will replace the Company’s current Stock Plan, the SpartanNash Company 2020 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Current Plan”). If the 2024 Stock Plan is approved by our shareholders, it will become effective as of the date of shareholder approval, or May 22, 2024 (the “Effective Date”). If this proposal is approved, the number of shares of SpartanNash Common Stock that will be reserved for issuance under the 2024 Stock Plan will consist of 2,144,000 shares, less one share for every one share subject to an award granted under the Current Plan after March 15, 2024 and prior to the Effective Date. The Compensation Committee expects, based on projections and our current stock price, that the additional shares will satisfy equity compensation needs for approximately two years.
If the 2024 Stock Plan is approved, no further awards will be made under the Current Plan (although all outstanding awards previously granted under the Current Plan will remain outstanding and subject to the terms of that plan). If the 2024 Stock Plan is not approved by our shareholders, no awards will be made under it, and we would then continue to use the Current Plan in its current form as the framework for our equity incentive compensation program until the authorized shares are depleted and, to the extent we have insufficient shares in the Current Plan, we may be required to increase the cash component of our compensation mix which would inhibit our ability to align our executives’ interests with the interests of our shareholders, to recruit and retain new executives, key employees and non-employee directors, and motivate our current executives and key employees over a long-term horizon. On March 6, 2024, the closing price of SpartanNash Common Stock as quoted by Nasdaq was $19.97.
The affirmative vote of the majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required for the approval of this Proposal 3.
Key Component of Compensation
Equity compensation is a key component of our total compensation package. Attracting, retaining and motivating specialized talent is critical to achieving our strategic and operating goals and is essential to increase shareholder value. We believe that grants of equity allow us to remain competitive in the marketplace, enabling us to link executive compensation to performance, and attract, retain and motivate high-caliber talent dedicated to our long-term growth and success. The approval of the 2024 Stock Plan is necessary to allow SpartanNash to continue to utilize equity awards as part of our compensation plans. If the 2024 Stock Plan is not approved, the Company will be unable to continue to utilize equity compensation as part of its overall compensation program because the shares available under the Current Plan will be exhausted in the near future based on current and forecasted usage.
As part of the ongoing review of executive compensation practices, the Compensation Committee made changes to the 2023 Long Term Incentive awards to further align executive performance with shareholder interests by transitioning from performance cash incentives to stock-settled performance share units. If the Company is unable to grant awards under the 2024 Stock Plan and there are insufficient shares under the Current Plan, we will not have the ability to issue equity awards consistent with our current compensation program. As a result, we may be forced to revert to cash or cash-based compensation to help achieve our compensation objectives. If the Company is forced to increase cash compensation it could reduce available cash needed to pursue and execute our business strategy.
The following discussion and summary of the material terms of the 2024 Stock Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2024 Stock Plan which is set forth in Appendix A to this proxy statement.
16 |
|
Proposal 3: Approval of the SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
Key Features of the 2024 Stock Plan
The following features of the 2024 Stock Plan are intended to protect the interests of our shareholders:
17 |
|
Proposal 3: Approval of the SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
Determination of Number of Shares for the 2024 Stock Plan
In setting the number of shares authorized under the 2024 Stock Plan for which shareholder approval is being sought, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors considered, among other factors, the historical amounts of equity awards granted by the Company and the potential future grants over the next several years. Below is information regarding the Company’s burn rates for all grants of equity under all shareholder-approved equity plans for the past three fiscal years and the Company’s total potential dilution.
Burn Rate
Burn rate, a measure of the level at which a company uses shares available for grant under its equity compensation plans, is an important factor for investors concerned about shareholder dilution. Burn rate is defined as, in a given fiscal year, the number of shares subject to equity awards granted (or, in the case of performance stock unit awards, earned) divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. In setting and recommending to our shareholders the number of shares to be authorized under the 2024 Stock Plan, the Board considered the Company’s burn rate for each of the past three fiscal years (only full value awards were awarded during this period, with performance share units excluded as the Company began granting such awards in 2023 and such awards remained outstanding). The calculation of our burn rate for each year is shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fiscal Year Ended December 30, 2023 |
| Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
| Fiscal Year Ended |
|
Restricted Share Awards Granted1 |
| 447,910 |
| 391,334 |
| 562,653 |
|
Weighted Average Shares of Common Stock Outstanding (Basic) |
| 34,210,673 |
| 35,279,319 |
| 35,638,935 |
|
Burn Rate |
| 1.31% |
| 1.11% |
| 1.58% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the burn rates in fiscal years 2023, 2022 and 2021, our three-year average burn rate was 1.33%, which we believe is below the mean for our industry.
18 |
|
Proposal 3: Approval of the SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
Dilution Assuming Approval of the 2024 Stock Plan
The potential dilution, or overhang, is a common measure to assess the dilutive impact of equity plans. Total potential dilution is equal to (i) the number of shares available to be granted as future equity awards plus the number of shares subject to outstanding equity awards, divided by (ii) such total number of shares plus the total number of shares outstanding. Total potential dilution, prior to and after shareholder approval of the 2024 Stock Plan share replenishment, is shown in the table below:
Total Potiential Dilution | |||
Unvested Restricted Stock Awards Outstanding | 925,979 | ||
Unvested Performance Share Unit Awards Outstanding(1) | 483,673 | ||
Total Shares Subject to Outstanding Awards under the Prior Plans | 1,409,652 | ||
Remaining Share Reserve under Current Plan | 10,629 | ||
Shares of Common Stock Outstanding (Basic) as of March 27, 2024 | 34,465,355 | ||
Total Current Dilution | 4.1% | ||
Incremental Shares Proposed for the 2024 Stock Plan | 2,144,000 | ||
Total Proposed Dilution | 10.3% | ||
Description of 2024 Stock Plan
Administration. The Compensation Committee will administer the 2024 Stock Plan and will have full power and authority to determine when and to whom awards will be granted, and the type, amount and other terms and conditions of each award, consistent with the provisions of the 2024 Stock Plan. Subject to the provisions of the 2024 Stock Plan, the Compensation Committee may amend the terms of, or accelerate the exercisability of, an outstanding award. The Compensation Committee will have authority to interpret the 2024 Stock Plan and establish rules and regulations for the administration of the 2024 Stock Plan.
The Compensation Committee may delegate its powers under the 2024 Stock Plan to the Chief Executive Officer and/or one or more executive officers, subject to the requirements of applicable law and exchange requirements. However, such delegated officers will not be permitted to grant awards to any members of the Board or executive officers who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
Eligibility. Any employee, officer, consultant or independent contractor providing services to SpartanNash Company or an affiliate, or any person to whom an offer of employment or engagement has been made, and who is selected by the Compensation Committee to participate, is eligible to receive an award under the 2024 Stock Plan. Any member of the Board is also eligible to receive an award under the 2024 Stock Plan. The number of persons eligible to participate as of March 27, 2024 (the record date for the meeting), had the 2024 Stock Plan been in effect, is estimated to be approximately 17,000 individuals; including nine non-employee directors and eight executive officers; however, historically the Compensation Committee has not granted awards to more than approximately 200 Associates and nine non-employee directors in any single fiscal year.
19 |
|
Proposal 3: Approval of the SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
Shares Available for Awards. The maximum number of shares of the Company’s Named Executive Officers
The Compensation Committee will adjust the number of shares and share limits described above in the case of a stock dividend, recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-off, repurchase or exchange of shares, or other similar corporate transaction if such an adjustment is necessary to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits available under the 2024 Stock Plan. Any adjustment determination made by the Compensation Committee shall be final, binding and conclusive.
Non-Employee Director Compensation Limit. For any non-employee director, the sum of the grant date fair value of equity-based awards and the amount of cash-based compensation earned by such director for service as a non-employee director during any calendar year may not exceed $750,000. The independent members of the Board may make exceptions to this limit for a non-executive chair of the Board, provided that the non-employee director receiving such additional compensation may not participate in the decision to award such compensation.
Type of Awards and Terms and Conditions. The 2024 Stock Plan provides that the Compensation Committee may grant awards to eligible participants in any of the following forms, subject to such terms, conditions and provisions as the Compensation Committee may determine to be necessary or desirable:
The Compensation Committee will have the right to make the timing of the grant and/or the issuance, ability to retain, vesting, exercise and/or settlement of awards subject to completion of a minimum period of service, achievement of one or more performance goals or both as deemed appropriate by the Compensation Committee; provided, that a maximum of five percent of the aggregate number of shares available for issuance under the 2024 Stock Plan may be issued with the terms providing for a right of exercise or a lapse on any vesting condition earlier than a date that is at least one year following the date of grant, provided that an award agreement by its terms may permit acceleration or waiver of the minimum restrictions upon a Change in Control or termination of a participant’s employment, including upon the participant’s death, disability, retirement or involuntary termination. In addition, the Compensation Committee retains the right to amend or modify an award agreement to provide for accelerated vesting or exercisability including, without limitation, upon a termination of employment.
20 |
|
Proposal 3: Approval of the SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
In the case of awards issued to non-employee directors at the time of the annual meeting, the minimum vesting period is measured from grant until the next annual meeting date that is at least 50 weeks after the immediately preceding year’s annual meeting date the grant date. In addition, shares that are issued in substitute for awards that are assumed, converted, or substituted pursuant to a merger or similar transaction and shares that are delivered in lieu of fully vested cash awards need not comply with the minimum vesting period.
Options and SARs. The holder of an option is entitled to purchase a number of shares of our common stock at a specified exercise price during a specified time period, all as determined by the Compensation Committee. The holder of a SAR is entitled to receive the excess of the fair market value (calculated as of the exercise date) of a specified number of shares of our common stock over the grant price of the SAR. We would receive no consideration for options or SARs granted under the 2024 Stock Plan, other than the services rendered by the holder in his or her capacity as an employee, officer, director, consultant or independent contractor of the Company.
Restricted Stock and RSUs. The holder of restricted stock will own shares of our common stock subject to restrictions imposed by the Compensation Committee for a specified time period determined by the Compensation Committee. The holder of an RSU will have the right, subject to restrictions imposed by the Compensation Committee, to receive shares of our common stock at some future date determined by the Compensation Committee. The grant, issuance, retention, vesting and/or settlement of restricted stock and RSUs will occur at such times and in such installments as are determined by the Compensation Committee, subject to the minimum vesting provisions described above. A restricted stock or RSU award that is conditioned in whole or in part upon the achievement of one or more financial or other company-related performance goals (including goals specific to the participant's individual performance, other than performance of service alone) is generally referred to as a performance share or performance share unit (PSU) award.
21 |
|
Proposal 3: Approval of the SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
Dividends and Dividend Equivalents. The holder of a dividend equivalent (or a dividend with respect to restricted stock) will be entitled to receive payments (in cash or shares of our common stock) equivalent to the amount of cash dividends paid by the Company to shareholders with respect to the number of shares determined by the Compensation Committee. Dividend equivalents will be subject to other terms and conditions determined by the Compensation Committee, but the Compensation Committee may not (i) grant dividend equivalents in connection with options or SARs or (ii) pay a dividend or dividend equivalent with respect to a share underlying any other award prior to the date on which all conditions or restrictions on such share have been satisfied or lapsed.
Other Stock-Based Awards. The Compensation Committee is also authorized to grant other types of awards that are denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to shares of our common stock, subject to terms and conditions determined by the Compensation Committee and the limitations in the 2024 Stock Plan. No such stock-based awards will contain a purchase right or an option-like exercise feature.
Termination and Amendment
The 2024 Stock Plan has a term of ten years expiring on May 22, 2034, unless terminated earlier by the Board. The Board may from time to time amend, suspend or terminate the 2024 Stock Plan. No amendment or modification of the 2024 Stock Plan may be made that would materially and adversely affect any outstanding award without the consent of the participant or the current holder of the award (except in the case of amendments to comply with law, regulation or stock exchange policy or amendments in connection with a corporate transaction as described below). Amendments to the 2024 Stock Plan must be approved by the shareholders, if required under the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Global Select Market or any other securities exchange applicable to the Company, or if the amendment would (i) increase the number of shares authorized under the 2024 Stock Plan (other than in connection with certain equitable adjustments), (ii) permit a repricing of options or SARs, (iii) permit the award of options or SARs with an exercise price less than 100% of the fair market value of a share on the date of grant, (iv) increase the maximum term of options or SARs, or (v) increase the annual per-person share limits under the 2024 Stock Plan.
Effect of Corporate Transaction
Awards under the 2024 Stock Plan are generally subject to special provisions upon the occurrence of any reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, plan of arrangement, take-over bid or tender offer, repurchase or exchange of shares, or any other similar corporate transaction or event involving the Company. The Compensation Committee or the Board may provide for any of the following to be effective upon the occurrence of the event (or effective immediately prior to the consummation of such event, as long as the event is consummated):
22 |
|
Proposal 3: Approval of the SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
In general terms, a "change in control” under the 2024 Stock Plan occurs (i) upon an acquisition by a person, entity or affiliated group, with certain exceptions, of 20% or more of the Company’s then outstanding common stock or voting securities; (ii) upon a majority of the incumbent Board members ceasing for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board; (iii) consummation of an organization, merger, or consolidation into another entity unless (x) the holders of the Company’s voting shares immediately prior to the corporate transaction have at least 50% of the combined voting shares in the merged entity or its parent, (y) no person owns 20% or more of outstanding voting shares, and (z) the majority of the Company’s Board remains incumbent; or (iv) the consummation of a plan or liquidation or dissolution of the Company or the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’ s assets, with certain exceptions.
The Company’s recent practice has been to provide for acceleration if the participant is terminated within a period of time after a change of control or if an acquiring entity does not assume outstanding awards.
Limited Transferability of Awards
Generally, no award or other right or interest of a participant under the 2024 Stock Plan (other than fully vested and unrestricted shares issued pursuant to an award) will be transferable by a participant other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and no right or award may be pledged, alienated, attached or otherwise encumbered, and any purported pledge, alienation, attachment or encumbrance shall be void and unenforceable against the Company or any affiliates. However, the Compensation Committee may allow transfer of an award to family members for no value, and such transfer shall comply with the General Instructions to Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Compensation Committee may establish procedures to allow a named beneficiary to exercise the rights of the participant and receive any property distributable with respect to any award upon the participant’s death.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
This discussion regarding federal tax consequences is intended as general information. Alternative minimum tax and foreign, state and local income taxes are not discussed, and may vary depending on individual circumstances and from locality to locality.
Grant of Options and SARs. The grant of a stock option or SAR is not expected to result in any taxable income to the recipient.
Exercise of Options and SARs. Upon exercising a non-qualified stock option, the optionee must recognize ordinary income equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of the Company’s common stock acquired on the date of exercise over the exercise price, and we (or the affiliate employer) generally will be entitled at that time to an income tax deduction for the same amount. The holder of an ISO generally will have no taxable income upon exercising the option (except that an alternative minimum tax liability may arise), and we will not be entitled to an income tax deduction. Upon exercising a SAR, the amount of any cash received and the fair market value on the exercise date of any shares of our common stock received are taxable to the recipient as ordinary income and generally are deductible by us (or the affiliate employer).
Disposition of Shares Acquired Upon Exercise of Options and SARs. The tax consequence upon a disposition of shares acquired through the exercise of an option or SAR will depend on how long the shares have been held and whether the shares were acquired by exercising an ISO or by exercising a non-qualified stock option or SAR. Generally, there will be no tax consequence to the Company in connection with the disposition of shares acquired under an option or SAR, except that the Company (or the affiliate employer) may be entitled to an income tax deduction in the case of the disposition of shares acquired under an ISO, if the disposition occurs before the applicable ISO holding periods set forth in the Internal Revenue Code have been satisfied.
23 |
|
Proposal 3: Approval of the SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
Restricted Stock. Recipients of grants of restricted stock generally will be required to recognize taxable ordinary income at the time it is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture in an amount equal to the fair market value of the restricted stock at such time. However, an award holder who makes an 83(b) election within 30 days of the date of grant of the restricted stock will incur taxable ordinary income on the date of grant equal to the fair market value of such shares of restricted stock (determined without regard to forfeiture restrictions) at such time. With respect to the sale of shares after the forfeiture restrictions have expired, the holding period to determine whether the award recipient has long-term or short-term capital gain or loss generally begins when the restrictions expire, and the tax basis for such shares will generally be based on the fair market value of the shares on that date. However, if the award holder made an 83(b) election as described above, the holding period commences on the date of such election, and the tax basis will be equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of the election (determined without regard to the forfeiture restrictions on the shares). If the award permits dividends to accrue while the restricted stock is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, such dividends will be paid if and when the underlying stock vests and will also be taxed as ordinary income. We (or the affiliate employer) generally will be entitled to an income tax deduction equal to amounts the award holder includes in ordinary income at the time of such income inclusion.
RSUs and Other Stock-Based Awards. Recipients of grants of RSUs (including performance share units) will not incur any federal income tax liability at the time the awards are granted. Award holders will recognize ordinary income equal to (a) the amount of cash received under the terms of the award and, as applicable, (b) the fair market value of the shares received (determined as of the date of receipt) under the terms of the award. If the award permits dividend equivalent amounts to accrue while the RSU is outstanding, such dividend equivalent amounts will be paid if and when the underlying RSU vests and will also be taxed as ordinary income at the time of receipt. Cash or shares to be received pursuant to any other stock-based award generally become payable when applicable forfeiture restrictions lapse and the compensation is received; provided, however, that, if the terms of the award so provide, payment may be delayed until a later date to the extent permitted under applicable tax laws. We (or the affiliate employer) generally will be entitled to an income tax deduction for any amounts included by the award holder as ordinary income. For awards that are payable in shares, a participant’s tax basis is equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time income is recognized. Upon the sale of the shares, appreciation (or depreciation) after the shares are paid is treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss) depending on how long the shares have been held.
Income Tax Deduction. Subject to the usual rules concerning reasonable compensation, including our obligation to withhold or otherwise collect certain income and payroll taxes, we (or the affiliate employer) generally will be entitled to a corresponding income tax deduction at the time a participant recognizes ordinary income from awards made under the 2024 Stock Plan. However, Section 162(m) of the Code prohibits publicly held corporations from deducting more than $1 million per year in compensation paid to certain current and former executive officers.
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The Compensation Committee intends to administer and interpret the 2024 Stock Plan and all award agreements in a manner consistent to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code to avoid any adverse tax results thereunder to a holder of an award.
New Plan Benefits
In general, benefits that will be awarded or paid under the 2024 Stock Incentive Plan, if stockholder approval of this Proposal Three is obtained, cannot currently be determined as such future awards are within the Compensation Committee’s discretion. Although future benefits cannot be determined, on March 5, 2024, the Compensation Committee approved, subject to shareholder approval of the 2024 Stock Incentive Plan at the Annual Meeting, the granting of performance stock units to certain of our executive officers. The number of units subject to the performance stock unit award was determined based on our stock price as of March 4, 2024, and the grants will be issued to the participants following the approval of the 2024 Stock Incentive Plan. In the event our shareholders do not approve the 2024 Stock Incentive Plan, the performance stock unit awards set forth below will not be granted.
24 |
|
Proposal 3: Approval of the SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
The following table shows information regarding the performance stock unit awards determined on March 4, 2024, and which will be granted under the new 2024 Stock Incentive Plan, subject to shareholder stockholder approval of the 2024 Stock Incentive Plan. These grants are expressly made subject to stockholder approval of the new 2024 Stock Incentive Plan at the Annual Meeting.
Name and Position | Number of Units | ||
Tony Sarsam, President and Chief Executive Officer | 147,253 | ||
Jason Monaco, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 32,672 | ||
Masiar Tayebi, Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy and Information Officer | 15,102 | ||
Bennett Morgan, Executive Vice President and Chief Merchandising Officer | 15,102 | ||
All current executive officers as a group | 210,129 | ||
All current directors who are not executive officers as a group | — | ||
All employees, including all current officers who are not executive officers, as a group | — | ||
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information about shares subject to our equity compensation plans in effect as of December 30, 2023, the end of our fiscal year 2023:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 30, 2023(3) |
| Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding warrants and rights (a) |
| Weighted- average exercise price of outstanding warrants and rights (b) |
| Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) |
| 580,620 |
| n/a(2) |
| 470,810 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
| — |
| n/a |
| — |
|
Total |
| 580,620 |
| n/a |
| 470,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The Board unanimously recommends that you vote FOR approval of the SpartanNash Company |
25 |
|
SpartanNash’s Audit Committee has approved the selection ofselected Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as the Company’s independent auditorscertified public accounting firm to audit the financial statements and internal controls of SpartanNash and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016,2024, and to perform such other appropriate accounting services as may be approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors propose and recommend that shareholders ratify the selection of Deloitte to serve as the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal 2016.
The Audit Committee evaluates the independence of the auditors at least annually. Deloitte has provided written affirmation that they are independent under all applicable standards, and the Audit Committee believes that Deloitte has effective internal monitoring of their independence. The Company and Deloitte have complied with SEC requirements on audit partner rotation. The lead audit partner was most recently replaced forrotated following the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013.31, 2022.
Independence is not the sole factor in the selection of the Company’s independent auditor. The Audit Committee also considers price, quality of service and knowledge of SpartanNash and the Company’sits industry when selecting its auditor.
More information concerning the relationship of the Company with its independent auditors appears below under the headings “Audit Committee,” “Independent Auditors,”Auditors” and “Audit Committee Report.”
IfThe Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of Deloitte as the Company’s independent auditor is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
At the Annual Meeting, our shareholders doare being asked to ratify the appointment of Deloitte as the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal 2024. Although shareholder ratification is not required by the Company’s organizational documents or applicable law, we value shareholders’ views on the Company’s independent certified public accounting firm and as a matter of good corporate practice we ask you to ratify the selection of Deloitte,Deloitte. In the event that the shareholders fail to ratify the selection, it will be considered a recommendation to the Audit Committee willto consider the selection of a different firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may in its discretion select a different independent auditor at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in auditors for the next year.best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
Representatives of Deloitte are expected to be present at the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.
Your Audit Committee, which consists entirely
| The Audit Committee and Board unanimously recommend that you vote FOR ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent certified public accounting firm for fiscal 2024. |
26 |
|
John Chevedden, reported to the Company as the owner of independent directors, and Board of Directors recommend that you voteFOR ratification250 shares of the selectionCompany’s common stock, has notified the Company of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditorshis intention to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting. The address of, and number of shares held by, the proponent will be furnished upon oral or written request made to the Company. We are not responsible for the year ending December 31, 2016.
Proposal 5 – Simple Majority Vote
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLESShareholders request that our board take each step necessary so that each voting requirement in our charter and bylaws (that is explicit or implicit due to default to state law) that calls for a greater than simple majority vote be replaced by a requirement for a majority of the votes cast for and against applicable proposals, or a simple majority in compliance with applicable laws. If necessary this means the closest standard to a majority of the votes cast for and against such proposals consistent with applicable laws. This includes making the necessary changes in plain English.
Shareholders are willing to pay a premium for shares of companies that have excellent corporate governance. Supermajority voting requirements have been found to be one of 6 entrenching mechanisms that are negatively related to company performance according to "What Matters in Corporate Governance" by Lucien Bebchuk, Alma Cohen and Allen Ferrell of the Harvard Law School. Supermajority requirements are used to block initiatives supported by most shareowners but opposed by a status quo management.
This proposal topic won from 74% to 88% support at Weyerhaeuser, Alcoa, Waste Management, Goldman Sachs, FirstEnergy, McGraw-Hill and Macy's. These votes would have been higher than 74% to 88% if more shareholders had access to independent proxy voting advice. This proposal topic also received overwhelming 98%-support each at the 2023 annual meetings of American Airlines (AAL) and The Carlyle Group (CG).
The overwhelming shareholder support for this proposal topic at hundreds of major companies raises the question of why SpartanNash had not initiated this proposal topic on its own.
Please vote yes:
Simple Majority Vote – Proposal 5
BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION OF THE PROPOSAL
The Board is committed to developingsound and implementing principleseffective corporate governance practices that promote long-term shareholder value, strong independent leadership, and management accountability. After careful consideration, and for the following reasons, the Board believes thatProposal 5 is not in the best interests of theCompany’s shareholders.Accordingly, the Board unanimously recommends voting “AGAINST”Proposal 5.
27 |
|
Proposal 5: Shareholder Proposal regarding a Simple Majority Vote, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting
The Company's governance documents already require a majority vote standard in all except for one reasonable and limited circumstance. The only supermajority requirement in the bylaws and restated articles of incorporation is found in Article X of the bylaws, requiring supermajority shareholder approval for amendments to the bylaws. Other than this provision, matters brought to a vote of our shareholders require a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote. This narrowly tailored exception is designed to protect shareholder interests, and to avoid unnecessary disruption and reduction in shareholder value.
The Board believes that this extraordinary action is an event of sufficient importance to require a higher voting standard and to seek broad affirmative support from shareholders, rather than a simple majority vote. The higher voting standard, which is narrowly tailored, helps the Board’s commitment to advance the following goals:
The Board is already highly accountable to shareholders. Our Board is firmly committed to integrity in corporate governance and has implemented a comprehensive array of corporate governance practices and policies that enable shareholders to helphold the Board fulfill its responsibilitiesaccountable and, where necessary, permit for quick action to support shareholder interests. The Company’s governance documents and policies implement the goal of accountability without the governance risk to shareholders introduced by this proposal. Elements of the Company’s comprehensive corporate governance practices and policies include:
Required Vote
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares of the Company’s Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter is required to approve this proposal.
Recommendation of the Board
| The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 5 |
28 |
|
The Accountability Board, reported to the Company as the owner of at least $25,000 of the Company’s common stock, has notified the Company of its intention to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting. The address of, and number of shares held by, the proponent will be furnished upon oral or written request made to the Company. We are not responsible for the accuracy or content of the proposal or supporting statement, which are presented as received from the proponent in accordance with SEC rules.
RESOLVED: Shareholders ask SpartanNash to disclose how much of its pork is produced using gestation crates (based on data it’s already collected) and publish measurable targets for transitioning away from them.
SUPPORTING STATEMENT:
Dear fellow shareholders,
Gestation crates lock pregnant pigs into cages so restrictive that, for months on end, they can’t even turn around. Although this raises both ethical and material concerns, SpartanNash lacks any commitment on the issue. Moreover, despite having apparently already measured gestation crates’ prevalence in its supply chain, it’s keeping those findings secret.
We think this should change.
For context, gestation crates are so controversial, eleven states—including Michigan, SpartanNash’s home state—ban or restrict them (see, for example, CageFreeLaws.com). And other retailers are addressing these solitary confinement cages by moving to group-housed pork:
Further, SpartanNash’s lack of commitment isn't just incongruous with other retailers, but also with its own animal welfare statements.
SpartanNash’s Animal Welfare Policy says, “We encourage our suppliers to incorporate the Five Freedoms of animal welfare in their supply chain.” But three of those are freedom from discomfort, freedom to express normal behaviors by providing sufficient space, and freedom from fear/distress—all of which are severely hindered by gestation crates.
Finally, consider SpartanNash’s reporting on the topic.
29 |
|
Proposal 6: Shareholder Proposal Regarding Animal Welfare, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting
Responding to SASB’s metric about the percent of gestation crates in the supply chain, SpartanNash’s 2021 ESG Report said the data was “being reviewed and assessed for disclosure in the future. ”Then, its 2022 ESG Report said, “We do not disclose this information publicly.”
That secrecy raises additional concerns.
Consider, for example, new data from FMI—a trade group Vice-Chaired by SpartanNash CEO Tony Sarsam. As a 2023 FMI study found, transparency is “extremely important” to the vast majority of shoppers, with 74% of respondents saying that means providing “values-based information such as animal welfare.”
Similarly, a 2023 Merck study found that for 66% of consumers, both animal welfare itself and “transparency in animal proteins” are “extremely or very important.”
Accordingly, we think SpartanNash should disclose the prevalence of gestation crates in the supply chain and targets for moving away from them. And since doing so would align SpartanNash with industry peers that have published such targets, the development of related regulations, and SpartanNash’s own animal welfare statements, we believe shareholder support is clearly warranted.
Thank you.
Contact: SPTN@TABholdings.org
BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION OF THE PROPOSAL
The Board has carefully considered Proposal 6 and, for the reasons described below, believes that the implementation of this proposal is unnecessary and not in the best interests of the Company or its shareholders. The Company already makes disclosures detailing our commitment to animal welfare, and this proposal fails to meaningfully enhance the Company’s existing animal welfare policies and practices.
Continued Commitment to Animal Welfare
SpartanNash is a retailer and a distributor of food products that does not own or operate any farms or animal processing facilities. While the Company works with suppliers to provide a framework for overseeingrange of products that cater to the managementindividual needs and demands of our customers and shoppers, such as pork products, overall sales of pork products by the Company currently represent only about 0.1% of the Company.entire domestic pork market.
Our mission is to deliver the ingredients for a better life, and we strive to ensure that families have convenient access to a wide variety of fresh, high-quality, and affordable nutrition options. As part of our commitment to corporate social responsibility, we are also committed to the issue of humane treatment of animals and recognize that best practices around animal welfare are part of an ongoing evolution based on various factors, including new information, technologies and agricultural advancements.
We care deeply about the humane treatment of animals, which is why we maintain an Animal Welfare Policy, available on our website at https://www.spartannash.com/corp-responsibility/environment/animal-welfare/. As part of our policy, in addition to expecting that suppliers and vendors comply with all applicable laws and regulations regarding the treatment of animals, we expect our suppliers and vendors to incorporate the Five Freedoms of animal welfare into their supply chain. Our Animal Welfare Policy also discusses our Company’s commitments related to animal welfare, including supporting an Animal Welfare Committee and engaging and working cooperatively with suppliers to embrace and promote animal welfare practices. Moreover, with respect to pork specifically, all of the Company’s U.S. pork suppliers have reported to us that they abide by the standards of the National Pork Board’s Pork Quality Assurance ("PQA") Plus Program. Finally, the Company is a member of the Animal Agricultural Alliance which provides members with resources for establishing science-based, global animal welfare standards and best practices.
30 |
|
Proposal 6: Shareholder Proposal Regarding Animal Welfare, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting
We recognize that the regulatory environment in the markets where we operate is continually changing. We remain committed to complying with all laws and regulations in the markets where we operate our business and will continue to monitor any changes that impose additional requirements on distributors and retailers.
Restricted Ability to Issue Measurable Targets
The Board understands that the proponent desires for the industry to move away from the utilization of gestation crates, and we are not disputing the merit of this position. However, this proposal would require SpartanNash to issue measurable targets for transitioning away from gestation crates and reflects a misunderstanding of our Company’s dependent role within the industry’s complex supply chain. Our Company has no control over the speed with which our supply chain could finance or implement the capital investments required to support this goal, and we do not believe it is responsible to make commitments that are entirely dependent upon third parties. We believe that more meaningful change may be achieved through collaboration amongst all stakeholders, including farmers, ranchers, suppliers, animal welfare organizations (such as the proponent) and regulatory bodies. As a downstream distributor and retailer, SpartanNash exists at the intersection of these various stakeholder interests and will continue our commitment to animal welfare by partnering with suppliers to meet the needs of our retail customers and shoppers in a measured and responsible manner.
In summary, we believe that the Company is best positioned to determine the animal welfare initiatives to which the Company should devote its attention and resources as well as the extent to which the Company should engage with suppliers on such initiatives. The Company already has disclosures in place detailing our commitment to animal welfare, and the proposal fails to enhance the Company’s animal welfare policies and practices in a meaningful way. Accordingly, the Board believes that this proposal is not in the best interests of the Company or its shareholders.
Required Vote
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares of the Company’s Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter is required to approve this proposal.
Recommendation of the Board
| The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 6. |
31 |
|
At SpartanNash, we are committed to sound and effective corporate governance practices that promote long-term shareholder value and foster strong independent leadership and management accountability. The Board has adopted a written Corporate Governance Policy.Policy that contains general principles regarding the responsibilities and function of our Board and Board Committees, including with respect to Board leadership structure, Board size and membership criteria, access to senior management and outside advisors, Board, Committee, and director evaluations, and director compensation. The Policy is designed to communicate our fundamental governance principles and to provide management, associates,Associates, and shareholders with insight to the Board’s ethical standards, expectations for conducting business, and decision-making processes.
More information regarding the Company’s corporate governance, including a copy of our Corporate Governance Policy, is available in the “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance” section of our website, www.spartannash.com. The information contained on or connected to the Company’s website is not incorporated by reference into and should not be considered part of this proxy statement.
Director IndependenceDIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
SpartanNash’sOur Corporate Governance Policy requires that at least two-thirds of the directors must be independent. Currently, tenThe Board has determined that all directors, other than our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Sarsam, are independent under applicable rules of Nasdaq. In addition, Matthew M. Mannelly, who served as a director for part of 2023 was deemed independent.
BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board periodically evaluate the leadership structure of the Board in light of a variety of factors that the Board considers important, including the Company’s current Board composition, the experience and skills of our elevenmanagement team, continuity of leadership, and other factors.
Concurrent with the appointment of Mr. Sarsam as Chief Executive Officer, the Board separated the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Hacker, who previously served as our Lead Independent Director, currently serves as the Board’s independent Chairman. The Board may consider having the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles filled by a single individual in the future and will determine whether to engage stakeholders in the decision-making process at that time. Currently, the Board believes that its leadership structure, in which the roles of Chairman of the Board and CEO are separated, best serves the Board’s ability to carry out its roles and responsibilities on behalf of the Company’s shareholders, including its oversight of management, and the Company’s overall corporate governance. The Board also believes that the current structure allows our CEO to focus on managing the Company, while leveraging our independent Chairman’s experience to drive accountability at the Board level.
Under the Corporate Governance Policy, if the chair of the Board is also the current or former Chief Executive Officer of SpartanNash, the Board will elect a Lead Independent Director from among the directors who are independent under Nasdaq Marketplace Rules.Listing Rule 5605(a)(2).
Director TenureBOARD EVALUATION AND DIRECTOR PEER REVIEW PROCESS
The Board recognizes that a robust evaluation process is an essential component of Directors considersstrong corporate governance practices and promotes Board effectiveness. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the lengthannual evaluation process, led by the Chair of servicethe Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
32 |
|
Corporate Governance
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the format of a director when determining whether he or she is “independent” under applicable rules.
Because the merger of Nash Finch and Spartan Stores fundamentally transformed each constituent company and created a new, larger, and more complex organization, the Board believes it is appropriateand Committee evaluation and director peer review process as necessary to measure director tenure by reference to service tohelp ensure that the combined company. The table below presentssolicited feedback remains relevant and appropriate. Currently, the approximate tenure of each non-management director and the average for the Board, measured with respect to the combined companies, and the “registrant.”
Director Tenure
Director | Years of Service to SpartanNash Company* | Years of Service to “Registrant”** | ||||||
Craig C. Sturken | 2.4 | 13.1 | ||||||
M. Shân Atkins | 2.4 | 12.8 | ||||||
Mickey Foret | 2.4 | 2.4 | ||||||
Frank Gambino | 2.4 | 12.8 | ||||||
Doug Hacker | 2.4 | 2.4 | ||||||
Yvonne Jackson | 2.4 | 5.5 | ||||||
Elizabeth Nickels | 2.4 | 15.8 | ||||||
Timothy O’Donovan | 2.4 | 12.8 | ||||||
Hawthorne L. Proctor | 2.4 | 2.4 | ||||||
William Voss | 2.4 | 2.4 | ||||||
Average | 2.4 | 8.2 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES (cont’d)
The Board engages in self-evaluation annually, using two processes in alternate years. In one year, the Board evaluates and assesses Committee performance and overall Board performance. The results are discussed by the full Board and each Committee, as applicable, and changes to the Board’s and its Committees’ practices are implemented as appropriate. In the alternate years,year, the Board conducts a Board and Committee evaluation that also includes a peer review process of individual directors. As part of this process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee selects an independent advisor who speaks with each director individually to obtain insights regarding the contributions of other directors, and assesses overallto discuss issues in greater depth and obtain more targeted feedback with respect to Board, performance.Committee and individual director effectiveness. The independent advisor provides a report to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board summarizing the findings. The Board believes that these processes help promote a culture of objective and robust discussion and deliberation.
The BoardTHE BOARD’S ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT
We recognize the importance of Directors’ Roleeffective risk management to the success of our business and shareholder value and we have long-standing and highly developed structures in Risk Oversight
place to manage risk. Management of risk is the direct responsibility of the Company’s senior leadership team. The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the Company’s risk management and risk mitigation. In its oversight of the Company’s risk-management process, the Board seeks to ensure that the Company is informed and deliberate in its risk-taking. Management of risk is the direct responsibility of the Company's senior leadership team. The Company's Compliance Officer ("CO") reports to the Chief Legal Officer ("CLO") and is responsible for overseeing the Company's compliance framework and programs, including monitoring risks that arise with relation to those programs. The CO is responsible for developing and maintaining compliance policies and procedures, monitoring and assessing compliance risks for the Company, and regularly reporting on compliance matters to the management team and to the CLO for further reporting and/or escalation to the Board, as appropriate. The Company’s primary mechanisms for risk management areconsist of the Company’s enterprise risk management program (“ERM”), its internal audit program, strategic review sessions held between the Board and management, and the Company’s external audit by an independent accountingauditing firm.
The Company relies on its ERM process to help identify, monitor, measure and manage risks. The ERM approach is designed to enable the Board of Directors to establish a mutual understanding with management of the effectiveness of the Company’s risk management practices and capabilities. The Company’s internal audit department provides management and the Board with information and analysis regarding operational, compliance and strategic risks, and seeks to improve business processes to minimize risks of fraud and abuse. Management and the internal audit department provide the Audit Committee with reports and updates on risk management matters at each Audit Committee meeting.
The Board of Directors continuouslyregularly analyzes the Company’s strategic plan and objectives with management. As part of this process, the Board and management identify and assess strategic risks attendant to initiatives such as acquisitions and divestitures, major investments, financings, and capital commitments.
The Board implements its risk oversight function both as a whole and through Committees, which meet regularly and report back to the full Board. In particular:
•
•
33 |
|
Corporate Governance
Cybersecurity Risk Oversight
The Board has appointed the Audit Committee to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to the oversight of cybersecurity, data security, privacy programs, and the Company’s response to security breaches. Two Audit Committee members completed the National Association of Corporate Directors/Carnegie Mellon CERT cyber-risk oversight program along with required examinations and earned the CERT designation. The Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO") provides quarterly updates to the Audit Committee, which include a current evaluation of the Company’s maturity within the National Institute of Standards and Technology ("NIST") framework, including assessments against key performance indicators, updates on internal phishing campaigns, tabletop exercises conducted at various levels of the organization, and management training. The Audit Committee also reviews reports and recommendations from third parties periodically engaged by the Company to assess the cybersecurity control environment. In addition, the Company’s internal audit function periodically audits elements of the security program and reports its observations to the CISO, Chief Information Officer, CLO and the Audit Committee.
ESG Risk Oversight
The Board has primary responsibility for senior leadership positions.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES (cont’d)
oversight of ESG matters, including initiatives and programs related to sustainability, corporate culture, and human capital management, with the standing Committees supporting the Board Leadership Structure
by addressing these specific ESG matters related to their respective areas of oversight. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the Company's ESG efforts, progress, and practices with respect to matters affecting the Board of Directors evaluate, from time to time, the leadership structureCompany’s culture and corporate responsibilities, including environmental protection and sustainability. The Audit Committee is charged with oversight of the Board of Directors in light of a variety of factors that the Board considers important,Company's controls and procedures related to ESG risks and disclosures, including the Company’s current Board composition,process for validating data disclosed in the experience and skills of our management team, efficiency, and other factors.
At this time, the Company has separated the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. However, effective upon the retirement of Mr. Sturken at the 2016 Annual Meeting, the Company expects that our CEO, Dennis Eidson, will be elected Chairman.Company's ESG reporting. The Board believes that doing so will help provide continuity of leadership and strategic vision at the Board level. In making this decision, the Board took into account the performance of Mr. Eidson as CEO, his positive relationships with the other members of the Board of Directors, and the perspective he would bring to the position of Chairman.
When the Chairman of the Board is the current or former Chief Executive Officer, or in other appropriate circumstances, the Board will elect a Lead Independent Director from among the independent directors,. The role of the Lead Independent Director is to aid and assist the Chairman and the rest of the Board in assuring effective corporate governance in managing the affairs of the Board and the Company.
The Board of Directors believes that this leadership structure supports the risk oversight function of the Board (discussed above) by allowing the Chief Executive Officer and senior management to focus on strategic opportunities and risks within the framework of the Company’s risk management programs, while the Board, under the leadership of the Chairman, provides oversight in connection with those efforts, and the Lead Independent Director helps promote overall effective governance.
Committee Charters
The Board has appointed three chartered committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Board has approved a written committee charter for each of these committees. The charters define basic principles regarding each committee’s organization, purpose, authority and responsibilities. The charters for the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are available in the “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance” section of our website, www.spartannash.com.oversees human capital management pay practices.
Director AttendanceDIRECTOR ATTENDANCE
The Board is proud of its record of recruiting and retaining directors who have a diversity of experience; have the highest personal and professional integrity; have demonstrated exceptional ability and judgment; and are effective in serving the long-term interests of shareholders. Board and Committee attendance is critical to the proper functioning of the Board of Directors and is a priority. Each director is expected to make every effort to personally attend every Board meeting and every meeting of each Committee on which he or she serves as a member.
SpartanNash’s Board of Directors held five meetings during fiscal 2015. In fiscal 2015,2023, each director attended at least 95%90% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and the committeesCommittees on which he or she served. The Board is scheduled to meet at least quarterly and may meet more frequently.
Independent directors meet in executive sessions, without the presence of management, at each regularly scheduled Board meeting.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES (cont’d)
Directors are also expected to attend the annual meeting of shareholders in personAnnual Meeting unless compelling personal circumstances prevent attendance. All of the Company’s directors then in office attended the 2015our 2023 annual meeting.meeting of shareholders.
Hedging and Pledging ProhibitedHEDGING AND PLEDGING PROHIBITED
The Board has adopted a policy that prohibits an executive officer or director of the Company from purchasing any financial instrument or entering into any transaction that is designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of the Company’s common stock or other equity securities (including, but not limited to, prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, or exchange funds).
34 |
|
Corporate Governance
In addition, the Company’s executive officers and directors are not permitted to pledge, hypothecate, or otherwise encumber shares of the Company’s common stock or other equity securities as collateral for indebtedness. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, holding such shares in a margin account. A copy of the Company’s Policy on Hedging and Pledging Company Stock is available in the “Investor Relations”Relations — Corporate Governance” section of our corporate website, www.spartannash.com.
Majority VotingMAJORITY WITHHELD VOTING POLICY
The Board believes that the Company and its shareholders are best served by having directors who enjoy the confidence ofUnder the Company’s shareholders. It will be presumed thatCorporate Governance Policy, any director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” than votes “for” such election in an uncontested election at an annual meeting of shareholders (a “Majority Withheld Vote”) does not have the full confidence of the shareholders. A director receiving a Majority Withheld Vote is required to offer his or her resignation from the Board to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee upon certification of the shareholder vote. The resignation will be effective if and when accepted by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which consists entirely of independent directors, will promptly consider the acceptance of the director’s offer of resignation (excluding the affected director from consideration of and voting on acceptance of the resignation).
Change in Employment StatusCHANGE IN EMPLOYMENT STATUS
A director who experiences a material change in his or her employment status is expected to promptly offer his or her resignation as a director to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Committee will promptly consider and vote upon acceptance or rejection of the director’s offer to resign (excluding the affected director from consideration of and voting on acceptance of the resignation).
Other Board MembershipsOTHER BOARD MEMBERSHIPS
Executive officers of the Company must notify the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee before serving as a member of the board of directors of any other business organization. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the Chief Executive Officer’s membership on external boards of directors at least annually. The Chief Executive Officer may not serve on the board of directors of more than one business organization not affiliated with the Company without the prior review and approval of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Committee may limit the directorships for any other executive officer if it believes that they will interfere with the executive officer’s responsibilities to the Company. Non-management directors may not serve on more than three other public company boards without the prior review and approval of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES (cont’d)
Code of Conduct
SpartanNash is committed to the highest standards of integrity, honesty and ethics in business. The BoardAudit Committee has approved a Code of Conduct (the “Code”) that articulates the Company’s standards regarding business ethics and expectations. The Code applies to all associates,Associates, officers, and members of the Board of Directors.Board. The Code establishes guidelines to help the Company conduct our business with honesty and integrity and in compliance with applicable law.laws. The Code requires all associatesAssociates of the Company to report promptly any violations of the Code. Associates may report violations through reporting systems on a confidential and anonymous basis. The Code is available in the “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance” section of our website, www.spartannash.com. We intend to satisfy applicable disclosure requirements regarding any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the Code of Conduct by making disclosures concerning such matters available on the “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance” section of our website.
35 |
|
Corporate Governance
Succession Planning
MANAGEMENT SUCCESSION PLANNING
Under our Corporate Governance Policy, the Board of Directors maintains and periodically reviews a succession plan for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and such other executive officers as it deems appropriate to manage the continuity of leadership in the execution of the Company’s business strategies. The succession plans are based upon recommendations of the Compensation Committee with input fromand formally approved by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.Board.
Board and Management CommunicationBOARD AND MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION
SpartanNash is committed to open and effective communication between the Board and management. Directors are encouraged to consult with any SpartanNash manager or associateAssociate and may visit Company facilities without the approval or presence of corporate management. The Board encourages executive officers to invite managers to Board meetings from time to time who can provide additional insight into matters under discussion. The Board is required to dedicate a substantial portion of at least one meeting per year to discussions with management regarding the Company’s strategic plan.
Director EducationDIRECTOR EDUCATION
SpartanNashThe Board believes in continuous improvement of Board effectiveness and functioning as well as individual skills and knowledge. All new directors are required to participate in our director orientation program to familiarize them with the Company’s business, strategic plans, significant financial, accounting and risk management issues, ethics and compliance programs, corporate governance practices, sustainability strategy, principal officers, and internal and independent auditors. The Company encourages all of its directors to attend continuing education programs so that they may stay abreast of developments in corporate governance and best practices and further develop their expertise. The Board of Directors expects that each director will attend periodically an appropriate continuing director education program.
Nominee Qualifications and the Nominations ProcessSHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH DIRECTORS
There are no specific or minimum qualifications or criteria for nomination for election or appointment to the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies and evaluates nominees for director on a case-by-case basis, regardless of who recommended the nominee, and has no written procedures for doing so. The Board has identified certain qualifications, attributes and skills that should be represented on the Board as a whole. These are discussed beginning on page 21.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may engage and pay fees to third party search firms to assist in identifying possible nominees for director and providing information to assist the Committee in the evaluation of possible nominees.
The Board of Directors expects that there would be no material difference in the manner in which the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee would evaluate a nominee for director that was recommended by a shareholder.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES (cont’d)
Board Diversity
The Board of Directors believes that SpartanNash and its shareholders are best served by having a Board of Directors that brings a diversity of education, experience, skills, and perspective to Board meetings. The Board of Directors may consider factors and characteristics that are pertinent to diversity, such as race and gender, when evaluating nominees to stand for election or re-election to the Board. Currently:
Two of our directors are African-American; and
Three of our directors are women.
Shareholder Communications with Directors
Shareholders who wish to send communications to SpartanNash’sthe Board, any Committee or any director or group of Directorsdirectors may do so by sending them in care of theour Corporate Secretary, Ileana McAlary, at the address set forth on the Notice of Meeting included in this proxy statement. Communications may be addressed either to specified individual directors or the entire Board.SpartanNash Company, 850 76th Street, S.W., P.O. Box 8700, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49518-8700. The Corporate Secretary has the discretion to screen communications that are unrelated to the business or governance of SpartanNash, commercial solicitations, offensive, obscene, or otherwise inappropriate. The Corporate Secretary will, however, compile all shareholder communications whichthat are not forwarded, and such communications will be available to any director. A copy of our Shareholder Communication Policy can be found in the “Investor Relations— – Corporate Governance” section of our website, www.spartannash.com.
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE
As a food solutions company, SpartanNash is focused on delivering the ingredients for a better life to our customers, Associates and the communities we serve. We continue to make progress on our sustainability journey. Below are the Environmental, Social and Governance updates from 2023.
Environmental
Ton Miles Per Gallon ("TMPG")
SpartanNash continued to manage our mile efficiencies by:
Although case volume was lower in 2023, we continued to optimize our supply chain transit and loading. All of these measures taken in 2023, along with the lower case volume, contributed to the 14.5% year-over-year improvement in our TMPG.
36 |
|
Packaging and Product Materials
In 2023, the Company established sustainable packaging insights for Our Family® portfolio of products. Our private-label suppliers were asked to identify their packaging materials and provide the percentage of recycled content. This process enabled the Company to confirm that over 50% of Our Family paper packaging contains recycled material. With a baseline established, the Company is exploring ways to improve the sustainability of Our Family packaging going forward.
Food Safety
SpartanNash implemented a new food traceability program to strengthen safety and transparency throughout our global supply chain. Hundreds of SpartanNash suppliers who harvest or handle products on the U.S. Food and Drug Administrations Food Traceability List are now required to exchange traceability data with SpartanNash and the thousands of retailers served by the Company. The ReposiTrak Traceability Network® also enables us to obtain information about suppliers’ packaging and product materials, diversity, sustainability, and other responsible sourcing materials.
Plastic Bag Recycling
The Company expanded its partnership with Trex® to offer plastic bag recycling opportunities for Retail store guests. Plastic recycling for 2023 totaled over 900,000 pounds of plastic, which is recycled by Trex into deck boards and equates to the weight of approximately 50 semi-trucks.
Scope 1 and 2 Emissions
We reported Scope 1 and 2 emissions within our 2022 ESG Report and plan to publish our 2023 Scope 1 and 2 emissions on the Company’s website in the second half of 2024.
Social
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging ("DEIB")
As part of our People First culture, we cultivate a diverse and inclusive environment in which Associates can do their best work and feel they belong. We attract, develop and retain talent from all backgrounds, experiences and abilities. Our leaders are trained on dignity and respect, anti-harassment and anti-discrimination, and we expect them to support our DEIB efforts.
Leveraging Associate survey data from 2023, SpartanNash was named by Newsweek and market data research firm, Plant-A Insights Group, as one of America's Greatest Workplaces for Diversity 2024. In 2023, we introduced our People Philosophy to our senior leadership team, which incorporates the core competencies we use as a guide for hiring and developing talent. One of the competencies we introduced is Values Differences, which means recognizing the value that different perspectives and cultures bring to the organization. Frontline Associates will receive communication and training on this and other competencies in 2024. In addition, our four SpartanNash Associate Resource Groups, referred to as ARGs, grew in membership and engagement in 2023. We launched an online community called SpartanNash Connections to help members network and collaborate.
Internship Diversity
During our 2023 Summer Internship Program, the Company welcomed 105 interns from nearly 40 colleges, including historically black colleges and universities ("HBCUs"). The interns worked on meaningful projects and gained valuable skills that supported the business. Along the way, they participated in volunteer efforts, fun events, professional development opportunities, and an end-of-year celebration. The top 15 Intern Capstones Projects were presented to the entire internship class and the Company’s Executive Leadership Team.
Associate Recognition
Associate recognition continues to play a meaningful role in our People First culture.
In 2023, we launched a new awards program for salaried Associates called the All In Awards and provided 117 winners with Company stock and the opportunity to attend our annual leadership meeting. In addition, we celebrated our third annual Circle of Excellence awards program for frontline hourly Associates and our third annual Summit Awards for senior leaders. In terms of peer-to-peer recognition, feedback provided through our Human Resources Information System increased by 74% year-over-year.
37 |
|
Corporate Governance
In January 2023, we announced updates to our service awards, designed to better recognize and celebrate Associates at every milestone of their career. We provide a corporate service award for milestone anniversaries in the form of a monetary gift delivered via direct deposit, coupled with local recognition by leaders and within teams.
Throughout the year, approximately 70 Associates were profiled across internal and external messaging channels.
We will continue to expand recognition opportunities for Associates across the organization.
Leadership Development and Training
In 2023, 427 frontline leaders completed action-packed leadership development trainings covering a variety of topics, including change management, communication skills, team developing, and other skills related to their roles throughout our supply chain and Retail stores.
Throughout the year, 181 Associates participated in early career, aspiring leaders, mid-management level, and director-level and above development programs. Along with developing essential leadership skills, graduates of these programs tend to have a higher retention rate than the Company’s average retention.
Also in 2023, an additional 725 of our corporate Associates participated in team development sessions, designed to improve communication, trust, high performance and improved collaboration between our Associates.
Total Rewards
The Company’s entry-level pay has increased by more than 30% for Retail Associates since September 2020. In the past couple of years, the Company also expanded its bonus and tuition reimbursement programs, along with introducing paid parental leave for all Associates after the birth or adoption of a child. Additional voluntary benefits were added in 2023, including pet insurance, identity theft protection and prepaid legal benefits.
To recognize our longest-tenured Associates, we enhanced our service awards program for Associates based on years of service, with awards ranging from $100 to $1,000.
Enrollment in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan increased 60% since the Company began offering an additional discount as of the end of 2022. Associates who have been employed for at least 90 days have the option to use after-tax payroll deductions to purchase shares of SpartanNash common stock at a 15% discount on market, versus the previous discount of 5%.
Retention
Investments in our People First culture are paying off. During 2023, the Company continued to attract and retain top talent, reducing our total turnover rate by more than 9%*. The Company also sequentially improved our 90-day retention rate by 400 basis points in the back half of 2023.
*Improvement rate year-over-year as of year-end 2023.
Positive Labor Relations
As a People First company, we believe in open, honest, and constructive dialogue with each Associate, while actively listening to respective concerns. Due to our desire to maintain a culture of open and direct communication, we do not believe Associates need a third party to represent them. We believe third parties challenge our flexibility to communicate and discuss topics or concerns directly with our Associates. To help Associates cultivate skills in building effective teams, we recently introduced positive associate relations training sessions, which covered the current legal landscape, effective leadership, and communication techniques.
Approximately 7% of our workforce is unionized and we currently have labor agreements in place with each union.
38 |
|
Corporate Governance
Data Privacy and Cybersecurity
Management’s Role: The Information Security function is led by the CISO, under the direction of the CIO. Our CISO, who was appointed in August 2021, has over 20 years of experience within information security and is both a Certified Information Security Manager and a Certified Information Systems Auditor. Key responsibilities of the Information Security function include developing cybersecurity strategies; managing cybersecurity governance; performing cybersecurity risk assessments; ensuring compliance with security standards and regulatory requirements; managing identity and access; monitoring cybersecurity threats; validating cybersecurity alerts; preparing for and responding to cybersecurity incidents; business continuity and disaster recovery plans; and creating security awareness through periodic trainings of both Company leadership and Associates. Our CIO, CISO and CLO, who also serves as the Chief Compliance Officer, have oversight responsibilities of our Cybersecurity program.
Board Oversight: Our Board has appointed the Audit Committee to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to the oversight of cybersecurity, data security, privacy programs, and our response to security breaches. Two Audit Committee members completed the National Association of Corporate Directors/Carnegie Mellon CERT cyber-risk oversight program along with required examinations and earned the CERT designation. The CISO provides quarterly updates to the Audit Committee, which include a current evaluation of the Company’s maturity within the National Institute of Standards and Technology or NIST framework, including assessments against key performance indicators, updates on internal phishing campaigns, tabletop exercises conducted at various levels of the organization, and management training. The Audit Committee also reviews reports and recommendations from third parties periodically engaged by the Company to assess the cybersecurity control environment. In addition, our internal audit function periodically audits elements of the security program and reports its observations to the CISO and the Audit Committee.
Risk Management and Strategy: As a component of our overall risk management process, which is aligned with a broader Enterprise Risk Management framework, the Company has implemented a multi-layered approach to minimize cybersecurity risk and safeguard our data. We conduct cybersecurity risk assessments on a regular basis and respond to identified risk exposures by employing a combination of risk mitigation strategies, including the adoption of cybersecurity controls and maintaining a cybersecurity insurance policy that provides coverage for security breaches. We engage third-party consultants periodically to evaluate elements of the cybersecurity policy, processes, procedures and controls. The CISO and other members of the Executive Leadership Team respond to applicable recommendations arising from the third-party consultants. In addition, we engage a Qualified Security Assessor as part of the compliance requirements for Payment Card Industry ("PCI"). We also engage with a third-party risk management provider to ensure our vendors comply with internal security and privacy requirements and that key vendors are continually monitored for security risks.
Our cybersecurity governance practices are based on the Company’s common control framework which incorporates elements from the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, the Center for Internet Security’s benchmark standards, and specific regulatory and industry requirements including Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and PCI.
The CISO provides at least quarterly updates on the cybersecurity program, including the results of the cybersecurity risk assessments and the related responses, to the Company’s Security Governance Council composed of members of the Executive Leadership Team and to the Board's Audit Committee. We continually monitor cybersecurity threats and have a dedicated cybersecurity team in place to identify if any of the threats may lead to a cybersecurity incident. In the event of such an incident, we will take decisive measures to thoroughly analyze, contain, and eliminate the threat. Following an incident, a comprehensive review is performed to determine whether the incident meets qualitative or quantitative materiality thresholds, and whether the incident warrants public disclosure.
Safety
We have become a safety leader in our space, which is one of our biggest accomplishments. More than 98% of Associates worked injury-free in 2023.
39 |
|
Corporate Governance
Since 2020, we have reached the top quartile for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA") safety performance. During this same period, one of our biggest accomplishments has been reducing our lost-time incidents by 76%, which includes a 20% improvement year-over-year in 2023. This improvement puts us on track to meet our 2025 safety ESG goal two years ahead of schedule. Additionally, as a byproduct of the Company’s genuine effort to protect its people, we have reduced workers' compensation losses by 36% since 2021.
We launched several safety initiatives that have contributed to these improved metrics, including:
Animal Welfare
In 2023, the Company, through its Animal Welfare Committee, continued to review its Animal Welfare Policy for compliance with applicable laws and best practices. The Company is a member of the Animal Agriculture Alliance which provides access to science-based, global animal welfare standards and best practices. In 2023, we began the process of expanding our Animal Welfare Committee to include select external industry expertise. Moreover, in partnership with suppliers, we have reviewed and expanded our third-party certification program for various species to include the standards of the National Pork Board’s Pork Quality Assurance ("PQA") Plus certification program for fresh pork products, in addition to our current seafood sourcing commitments.
Corporate Giving
Through food and funding, we donated 6.2 million meals in 2023*, which means we are on track to meet our goal of donating 20 million meals from 2023 through 2025.
In 2023, the Company donated nearly $650,000 in products and funding to support disaster relief efforts and developed an Associate Hardship Fund, which provides financial aid to Associates in times of critical need. The newly established fund supported 24 Associates throughout the year through monetary gifts and fundraisers.
Also in 2023, the SpartanNash Foundation raised and granted almost $1.1 million through four companywide fundraisers, which benefited:
*According to Feeding America, 12 pounds of food equates to 10 meals, or each meal is roughly 1.2 pounds of food.
Volunteering
Helping Hands Day is a program we host each year at our three service centers in Grand Rapids, Mich., Norfolk, Va., and Minneapolis, Minn. During this day of service, groups of Associates come together to complete volunteer projects, living our Core Behaviors - We Serve and We Have Fun. In 2023, 26 nonprofit organizations were supported through the program, and Associates volunteered 4,785 hours during the event.
40 |
|
Corporate Governance
Governance
Board Refreshment
The Company continues to demonstrate its ongoing commitment to Board refreshment. This effort has been demonstrated through the addition of three new independent directors in 2022 and two new independent directors in 2023. These recent additions bring relevant business and leadership experience, as well as financial acumen and diverse backgrounds and perspectives.
Out of the eight director nominees, six have been appointed in the last four years and seven are independent.
Ethical Standards
The SpartanNash Code of Conduct, which is available on the Company's website, guides the ethical behavior and decisions of our Associates and ensures the Company’s policies drive honorable and compliant decision making across the organization. All Associates are required to review and acknowledge the Code on an annual basis. The Code provides guidance for Associates on how they live values within Our Winning Recipe every day to create a safe workplace, an environment in which Associates act responsibly and with integrity, deal fairly and equitably with customers and vendor partners, as well as how they interact with the public and government entities. Among other responsible business practices, the Code requires that all Associates observe anti-trust and trade policies and regulations.
In addition to the Company’s Code of Conduct, all of our suppliers are expected to acknowledge and comply with SpartanNash’s Vendor Code of Conduct, which extends the ethical values and compliance requirements to our key partners and includes:
In coordination with a third party, we perform annual assessments of vendors for data security compliance to ensure that both the Company and our business partners maintain secure environments that defend and protect against cybersecurity threats.
SpartanNash sponsors an Anti-Money Laundering Program (“AML”), led by a designated AML compliance officer. The program establishes policies and procedures for leading practices and requires training for Associates engaged in money services transactions.
Shareholder Outreach
Throughout 2022 and 2023, the Company significantly advanced its efforts with respect to investor transparency and outreach. The increase in active investor engagement has enabled the Company to further share the progress on Our Winning Recipe, strategic direction, and the individual elements of the transformational initiatives that are underway.
The Company is committed to having continuous shareholder outreach to further develop its relationships with current and prospective investors. To coordinate a meeting, please reach out to SpartanNash's Investor Relations via email at IR@spartannash.com.
For Additional Information
Stakeholders are encouraged to read the 2022 ESG Report, which is available on the Company's website.
41 |
|
Our Board consists of a diverse group of highly experienced and accomplished leaders in their respective fields. All of our directors have senior leadership experience at various public and private enterprises. In these positions, they have gained significant and diverse management experience, including strategic and financial planning, public company financial reporting, compliance, risk management, and leadership development. They also have in-depth public company experience serving as executive officers, or on boards of directors and board committees, and have a robust understanding of corporate governance practices and trends.
The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe the skills, qualities, attributes, and experiences of our directors provide SpartanNash with business acumen and a diverse range of perspectives to effectively address SpartanNash’s evolving needs and represent the best interests of SpartanNash’s shareholders.
NOMINEE QUALIFICATIONS AND THE NOMINATIONS PROCESS
There are no standing qualifications for nomination for election or appointment to the Board. In the event that a vacancy exists, or we decide to increase the size of the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends criteria tailored to the needs of the Board at that time to guide the search and evaluation of candidates and identifies, interviews and evaluates, and makes recommendations to the Board regarding appropriate candidates. The Board has identified certain qualifications, attributes and skills that should be represented on the Board as a whole, which are discussed in the “Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience to be Represented on the Board as a Whole” section below.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may engage and pay fees to third party search firms to assist in identifying possible candidates for director and providing information to assist the Committee in the evaluation of possible candidates.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates candidates recommended by a shareholder using the same criteria as for other candidates recommended by its members, other members of the Board, or other persons. Shareholders who wish to recommend a director candidate should submit the candidate’s name and background information in writing to our Corporate Secretary, Ileana McAlary, at SpartanNash Company, 850 76th Street, S.W., P.O. Box 8700, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49518-8700.
QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE TO BE REPRESENTED ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORSAS A WHOLE
The Company’s core businesses include distributing grocery products to a diverse group of independent and chain retailers, its corporate owned retail stores, military commissaries and exchanges, and an increasing number of larger e-commerce, dollar store and similar national account customers. Our corporate owned retail stores support our core distribution business. Food distribution is a highly competitive and dynamic business. Accordingly, the Board believes that at least some of our directors should have experience or specific knowledge in distribution, logistics, consumer goods and food industries at the executive level.
42 |
|
General
The Board of Directors currently consists
In addition, the Board believes that its membership should include directors who have:
BOARD REFRESHMENT
Our Board has an ongoing commitment to Board refreshment and to having highly qualified, independent voices in the boardroom. The Board believes the fresh perspectives brought by new directors are important to a forward-thinking and strategic Board when appropriately balanced with the deeper understanding of our business provided by longer-serving directors. In 2023, following the departure of former independent director atMatthew Mannelly, the 2016 Annual Meeting. FollowingBoard appointed Ms. Kerrie D. MacPherson and Mr. Fred Bentley, Jr. to the meeting,Board, increasing the board will consistsize of the Board to ten directors. All directors elected atEach, Ms. MacPherson and Mr. Bentley bring to the Board strong and relevant business and leadership experience, strong financial expertise, extensive experience in the area of mergers and acquisitions, human capital management expertise, and organizational and operational backgrounds which have enhanced the overall effectiveness and composition of the Board. The Board continually evaluates and makes recommendations for appointments to committee and chair assignments.
DIRECTOR SKILLS MATRIX
The following matrix highlights the mix of key skills and experiences of the nominees that, among other factors, led the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to recommend these nominees for election to the Board. The matrix is intended to depict notable areas of focus for each director, and not having a mark does not mean that a particular director does not possess that skill or experience. Nominees have developed competencies in these skills through education, direct experience, and oversight responsibilities. Additional biographical information on each nominee is set out below under the "Director Nominees" section of this year’s Annual Meeting will serveproxy statement.
Name | Business Operations and Leadership | Food or Consumer Product Industry | Sales and Marketing | Supply Chain / Logistics | Strategic Transaction / M&A | Financial Expertise | IT / Cybersecurity | Risk Management | Public Company Experience | ESG / D&I | ||||||||||||||||||||
M. Shân Atkins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Fred Bentley, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Douglas A. Hacker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Kerrie D. MacPherson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Julien R. Mininberg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Jaymin B. Patel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pamela S. Puryear, Ph.D. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tony B. Sarsam |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
Board of Directors
BOARD DIVERSITY
The Board believes that the Company and its shareholders are best served by having a one-year term, expiring atBoard that has a diversity of perspectives, education, experience, skills, gender, race, and ethnicity, and the 2017 Annual Meeting.Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee endeavors to seek out such candidates when searching for new directors. The following matrix highlights the diversity of our director nominees.
Board Diversity Matrix for Director Nominees (as of April 1, 2024)
Total Number of Director Nominees: 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Female |
| Male |
|
Part I: Gender Identity |
|
|
|
|
|
Directors |
| 3 |
| 5 |
|
Part II: Demographic Background |
|
|
|
|
|
African American or Black |
| 1 |
| — |
|
Alaskan Native or Native American |
| — |
| — |
|
Asian |
| — |
| 1 |
|
Hispanic or Latinx |
| — |
| — |
|
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander |
| — |
| — |
|
White |
| 2 |
| 4 |
|
Two or More Races or Ethnicities |
| — |
| — |
|
LGBTQ+ |
| — |
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOARD TENURE
Because the merger of Nash Finch and Spartan Stores in 2013 fundamentally transformed each constituent company and created a new, larger, and more complex organization, the Board believes it is appropriate to measure director tenure by reference to service to the combined company, which is SpartanNash. The table below presents the approximate tenure as of April 1, 2024 of each director nominee and the average for all director nominees, measured with respect to the combined company, SpartanNash.
Director Nominees | Years of Service | ||
M. Shân Atkins | 10.4 | ||
Fred Bentley, Jr. | 0.4 | ||
Douglas A. Hacker | 10.4 | ||
Kerrie D. MacPherson | 0.6 | ||
Julien R. Mininberg | 2.2 | ||
Jaymin B. Patel | 2.2 | ||
Pamela S. Puryear, Ph.D. | 2.2 | ||
Tony B. Sarsam | 3.5 | ||
Average | 4.0 | ||
44 |
|
Board of Directors
DIRECTOR NOMINEES
The biographies of each of the nominees and continuing directors below contain information regarding the person’s service as a director, business experience, director positionspublic company directorships held currently or at any time during the last five years, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board to determine that the person should continue to serve as a director for the Company. Except as otherwise indicated, each of these persons has had the same principal position and employment for over five years.
Nominees for Directors
| M. Shân Atkins, INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR AUDIT COMMITTEE CHAIR M. Shân Atkins, NACD.DC and ICD.D. is a business executive with extensive experience in retail strategy and operations, consumer goods, food distribution, accounting and finance, and private investment. She has been a director of SpartanNash since In addition to her service on the Board of SpartanNash, Ms. Atkins has Her prior experience includes serving as a director of SpartanNash Stores, Inc. (NASDAQ), from 2003 until the merger with Nash Finch Company in 2013, where she served a term as chair of the Audit Committee; Aurora Cannabis (NASDAQ), a leading Canadian integrated cannabis producer, from 2019 to 2023, where she chaired the Audit Committee and served on the Human Resources and Compensation Committee; SunOpta, Inc. (NASDAQ), a manufacturer of Ms. Atkins |
45 |
|
Board of Directors
Ms. Atkins started her career as a public accountant with Price Ms. Atkins’ qualifications | ||
| Fred Bentley, Jr. INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR Fred Bentley, Jr. is a business executive with extensive experience in the manufacturing, supply chain, and food industry. He joined the SpartanNash Board in November 2023 and serves on the Company's Audit and Compensation Committees. Since 2016, Mr. Bentley has been President and CEO of DexKo Global Inc., a manufacturer of highly engineered trailer running gear, chassis assemblies and related components. He oversees the Dexter and AL-KO global operations, and he has led DexKo to a leading market position with a successful growth strategy. Prior to joining DexKo, Mr. Bentley was CEO of Maxion Wheels, a $2.4 billion global automotive equipment supplier and the world’s largest wheel company. He served as Chief Operating Officer and President of International Operations of Hayes Lemmerz, leading the company’s sale process (to Maxion) and the divestitures of non-core businesses while significantly globalizing the core business. Mr. Bentley also has significant operational experience from his time at Honeywell/Allied Signal and experience in complex operations, finance and strategy from his seven years at Frito-Lay. Mr. Bentley currently serves on several boards including the board of directors for Aludyne, Inc. since 2013 and Grey Inc. since 2021, where he serves as a member of the Compensation Committee. Additionally, Mr. Bentley previously served on the board of directors for Versa Lift, Inc. from 2016 to 2019; SeaStar Solutions, GT Technologies and DURA Automotive (now Dura-Shiloh). Mr. Bentley earned his undergraduate degree in industrial engineering from the University of Cincinnati and attended the Harvard Business School Advanced Management Program. Mr. Bentley’s qualifications as a director include proven operational and leadership experience as a former Chief Operating Officer and as current President and Chief Executive Officer of global companies, as well as his vast supply chain expertise in a variety of markets and geographies and highly developed distribution networks. Mr. Bentley also has a strong record of successfully leading multiple acquisitions and divestitures. | |
46 |
|
Board of Directors
| Douglas A. Hacker INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR BOARD CHAIR Douglas A. Hacker is a business executive with extensive experience in consumer goods, finance and planning roles. He has been a director of SpartanNash since In addition to his service |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (cont’d)
Earlier in his career, Mr. Hacker served in a variety of finance and planning roles at American Airlines from 1981 to 1993. He also held various executive roles at UAL Corporation | ||
Mr. Hacker’s qualifications as a director | ||
| Kerrie D. MacPherson INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR Kerrie D. MacPherson is a business executive with extensive experience as an auditor and international business consultant. She joined the SpartanNash Board of Directors in In addition to the SpartanNash Board, since 2019 Ms. MacPherson has served as an independent director for Community Bank System, Inc. (NYSE: CBU) where she is Chair of the Audit Committee; a member of the Risk and Compliance Committee; a member of the Trust and Financial Services Committee; as well as a Board Liaison to the Employee Culture and Diversity Council. She also serves on the Board of Directors of the privately held Synechron Holdings Inc., where she is Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, since 2022. In 2018, Ms. MacPherson retired from Ernst & Young as a Senior Advisory Partner. She maintains current registration as a Chartered Professional Accountant (Canada) and serves as an SEC-designated financial expert on all of her audit committees. |
47 |
|
Board of Directors
In addition to corporate board service, Ms. MacPherson serves on the Dean’s Advisory Board and the Global Advancement Board at University of Toronto’s ROTMAN school. She also served on the Board of New York’s City Harvest from 2006 to 2023, and she was Executive Sponsor for EY Entrepreneurial Winning Women, a leadership program to assist female entrepreneurs in growing their businesses. In 2020, Directors and Boards Magazine named Ms. MacPherson a “Director to Watch.” Ms. MacPherson earned her undergraduate degree in commerce and her Master of Business Administration from the University of Toronto. She is a Fellow of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Ontario, the organization’s highest distinction. Ms. MacPherson’s qualifications to serve as |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (cont’d)
| Julien R. Mininberg INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR Julien R. Mininberg is a | |
Mr. Mininberg served as Chief Mr. Mininberg served as a director of Mr. Mininberg’s qualifications as a director include his 32-year track record of building market-leading multinational brands and organizations, proven operational and financial expertise, and seasoned leadership skills. | ||
48 |
|
Board of Directors
| Jaymin B. Patel INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR Jaymin B. Patel joined the SpartanNash Board of Directors in February 2022. Mr. Patel is a proven leader with more than 30 years of high-performance global operating experience in technology led gaming, consumer goods, large-scale distribution/supply chain, and manufacturing related businesses. He serves as the Chair of the Company's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and as a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Patel served as the President and CFO of Clarim Acquisition Corporation, a special purpose acquisition corporation, from 2020 to 2022, and has served as Executive Chairman of Perennial Climate, Inc. (formerly known as Cloud Agronomics Inc.), a leading platform for soil carbon measurement using remote sensing technologies to underpin carbon credit offset markets, since 2019. From 2015 to 2018, Mr. Patel was Chief Executive Officer and director of Brightstar Corporation, a global wireless device services company backed by Softbank (during that time). For more than two decades, he served in various executive and financial leadership roles at GTECH (now IGT), including as President and Chief Executive Officer of GTECH Corporation, from Mr. Patel currently serves as an independent director on the board of directors of Brown & Brown, Inc. (NYSE), a leading insurance brokerage firm, and Bally’s Corporation (NYSE), a world leader entertainment company. He also serves on the Board of Rip Van, an innovative low sugar food snacking business, and on other private company boards. Mr. Patel is Mr. Patel’s qualifications as a director | |
| Pamela S. Puryear, Ph.D. INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR Pamela S. Puryear, Ph.D. is a From 2009 to 2021, Dr. Puryear held several executive leadership roles, including Executive Vice President, Global Chief Human Resources Officer at Walgreens Boots Alliance; Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer at Zimmer Biomet; Senior Vice President, Chief Talent Officer at Pfizer Inc., and Vice President, Organizational Development and Chief Talent Officer at Hospira Inc. |
49 |
|
Board of Directors
Prior to 2009, Dr. Puryear led an independent organizational development consulting practice for 12 years working globally and across industry sectors, including consumer products, financial services, healthcare, professional services and insurance. Dr. Puryear spent her Dr. Puryear currently serves as an independent director of Standard Motor Products Inc. (NYSE) since 2021, where she serves as the Chair of the Compensation and Management Development Committee and is a member of the Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Strategic Planning Committees. Dr. Puryear also served as an independent director of Rockley Photonics Holdings (NYSE) from 2021 to 2023, where she chaired the Compensation Committee and was a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; and NextGen Healthcare Inc. (NASDAQ) from 2021 to December 2023, where she was a member of the Audit Committee. Dr. Puryear holds a Ph.D. degree in organizational psychology; an MBA degree from the Harvard Business School; and a BA degree in psychology with a concentration in organizational behavior from Yale University. She is a recognized business and human capital thought leader, currently serving as a Dr. Puryear’s qualifications to serve as a director | ||
| Tony B. Sarsam PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER As President and Chief Executive Officer of With more than three decades of experience in the food industry, Mr. |
50 |
|
Board of Directors
Prior to leading Ready Pac, Mr. Sarsam was President of the Nestlé USA Direct Store Delivery Company, where he created and led the world’s largest frozen direct store delivery network, serving Nestlé frozen pizza and ice cream businesses. He has also |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (cont’d)
Mr. Sarsam is an independent director Mr. Sarsam’s qualifications | ||
Retiring Director
51 |
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (cont’d)
Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience to be Represented on the Board as a Whole
The Board has identified particular qualifications, attributes, skills and experience that are important to be represented on the Board as a whole, in light of the Company’s current needs and the business priorities. The Company’s core businesses include distributing grocery products to military commissaries and exchanges and independent and corporate-owned retail stores and operating corporate-owned retail supermarkets. Grocery retailing and food distribution is a highly competitive and dynamic business. Accordingly, the Board of Directors believes that at least some of our directors should have experience or specific knowledge in retail or distribution industries at the executive level. The Board believes that directors with experience or in-depth knowledge of the grocery or food industries are uniquely qualified to inform the Board’s deliberations regarding business strategy. The Board has also found it valuable to have a member with specific knowledge and experience with military distribution and logistics. Because merchandising and marketing is central to our business, the Board believes that merchandising and marketing experience should be represented on the Board. In addition, the Board believes that its membership should include directors who have:
a high degree of financial expertise;
experience with human resources matters;
strategic planning skills; and
relevant business experience as a chief executive officer or equivalent.
Board CommitteesBOARD COMMITTEES
SpartanNash’s Board has three standing committees:
•
•
•
Meetings Held in |
| |||
Full Board of Directors | 9 | |||
Audit Committee | 7 | |||
Compensation Committee | 5 | |||
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | 8 | |||
Audit Committee.
The Board of Directors has established the Audit Committee to assist the Board in fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities with respect to accounting, auditing, financial reporting, internal controls and legal compliance. The Audit Committee oversees management and the independent auditors in the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee serves as a focal point for communication among the Board, the independent auditors, the internal auditors and management with regard to accounting, reporting, and internal controls.
See “Independent Auditors — Audit Committee Approval Policies” for a discussionCurrently, Ms. Atkins serves as Chair of the Audit Committee’s procedures for approving services to be provided by the independent auditors to SpartanNashCommittee and its subsidiaries.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (cont’d)
Messrs. Bentley, Patel and Proctor, and Ms. MacPherson serve as members. The Audit Committee operates under a charter adoptedhas the powers, authority and responsibilities specified in its Charter or delegated to the Committee by the Board of Directors.Board. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter is available in the “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance” section of our website, www.spartannash.com.
The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee members M. Shânis independent, as that term is defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act, and that Ms. Atkins, Mickey P. ForetMs. MacPherson, and Elizabeth A. NickelsMr. Patel are Audit Committeeaudit committee financial experts, as that term is defined in Item 401(h)(2) of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K. Under SEC regulations, a person who is determined to be an Audit Committee financial expert will not be deemed an expert for any other purpose, including without limitation for purposes of Section 11 ofby the Securities Act of 1933, as a result of being designated or identified as an Audit Committee financial expert, and theSEC. The designation or identification of a person as an Audit Committeeaudit committee financial expert does not impose on such person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liability imposed on such person as a member of the Audit Committee and Board of Directors in the absence of such designation or identification orotherwise affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of the Audit Committee or Board of Directors.Board.
Each member of the Audit Committee is independent, as that term is defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules and Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Compensation Committee.
The Board of Directors has established the Compensation Committee to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to compensation of the Company’s executive officers and the Company’s compensation and benefit programs and policies.
Currently, Dr. Puryear serves as Chair of the Compensation Committee and Messrs. Bentley, Mininberg and Voss, and Ms. Atkins serve as members. The Compensation Committee operates under a charter adoptedhas the powers, authority and responsibilities specified in its Charter or delegated to the Committee by the Board of Directors.Board. A copy of the Compensation Committee Charter is available in the “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance” section of our website, www.spartannash.com.
EachThe Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee is independent, as that term is defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules and Rule 10C-1 under the Securities Exchange ActAct.
52 |
|
Board of 1934.Directors
Processes and Procedures. Procedures. The Compensation Committee reviews executive compensation on a continuous basis each year, with the most comprehensive reviews typically taking place following fiscal year-end. The Committee reviews executive performance, current compensation levels, and compensation benchmarking data and analysis (please see the Compensation“Compensation Discussion and AnalysisAnalysis” section of this Proxy Statementproxy statement for information about benchmarking analysis). The Committee reviews this information in the context of the Company’s performance and financial results. At the conclusion of this review, the Compensation Committee grants share-based awards if appropriate, establishes goals and objectives for the then-current fiscal year, and may adjust executive salaries. The Compensation Committee’s decision-making process is explained in more detail in the Compensation“Compensation Discussion and AnalysisAnalysis” section of this proxy statement.
Consultants and Advisors. Advisors. The Compensation Committee is authorized to engage consultants, advisors and legal counsel at the expense of the Company. The Compensation Committee Charter requires that any consultant engaged for the purpose of determining the compensation of executive officers must be engaged directly by the Committee and report to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has authority to approve contracts with and payment of fees and other compensation of consultants, advisors and legal counsel.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (cont’d)
Prior to engaging or receiving advice from any compensation consultant or advisor, the Committee reviews the independence of the proposed consultant or advisor, taking into account the following factors:
•
•
•
•
•
Any other factors identified by applicable securities exchange listing standards.
Participation by Management. Management. The Company’s compensation philosophy and the administration of its various compensation plans are determined by the independent directors of the Compensation Committee. Company policy and Nasdaq rules prohibit participation by the Chief Executive Officer in the process of determining his or her own compensation. The Company’s executive officers and Human Resources associatesAssociates serve as resources to the Compensation Committee and provide advice, information, analysis and documentation to the Compensation Committee upon request. The Compensation Committee may delegate to the Chief Executive Officer authority to recommend the amount or form of compensation paid to other executive officers and associatesAssociates subordinate to the Chief Executive Officer, subject to such limitations as the Compensation Committee may require. The
Interlocks and Insider Relationships. None of the members of the Compensation Committee will not delegate toduring fiscal 2023 was an officer or Associate of SpartanNash or formerly an officer of SpartanNash. None of SpartanNash’s executive officers its authority to approve awardsserved as a member of stock optionsa compensation committee (or board committee performing a similar function) for another entity or other stock compensation.served as a director of another entity with an executive officer that serves on the SpartanNash Board. In addition, none of the members of the Compensation Committee have engaged in transactions with related persons since the beginning of fiscal 2023.
Share-based Award Policy.The Board of Directors has adopted a Policy Regarding Stock Option Grants and other share-basedShare based Awards which provides, among other provisions, that:
provides:
•
•
•
Only the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee, which consists entirely of independent directors, will approve share-based awards. This authority may not be delegated to executive officers or associates.
A copy of the Policy Regarding Stock Option Grants and other Share-based Awards is available in the “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance” section of our website, www.spartannash.com.
53 |
|
Board of Directors
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
The Board of Directors has established the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities by providing independent director oversight of nominations for election to the Board of Directors and leadership in the Company’s corporate governance. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee leads regular Board and Committee evaluation and director peer review processes and makes recommendations to the Board regarding Board refreshment.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (cont’d)
Currently, Mr. Patel serves as Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Messrs. Mininberg, Proctor and Voss, and Ms. MacPherson and Dr. Puryear serve as members. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has the powers, authority and responsibilities specified in its charterCharter or delegated to the committeeCommittee by the Board of Directors.Board. A copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter is available in the “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance” section of our website, www.spartannash.com.
Under the Corporate Governance Policy, if the chair of theThe Board is also the current or former Chief Executive Officer of SpartanNash, the Board will elect a Lead Independent Director from among the directors who are independent under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2). The responsibilities and authority of the Lead Independent Director are described in this proxy statement under the caption “Board Leadership Structure.”
Eachhas determined that each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is “independent”independent, as that term is defined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules..
54 |
|
Independent Auditors’ Fees
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ FEES
The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP to SpartanNash and its subsidiaries for the fiscal years ended January 2, 20162023 and January 3, 20152022 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
| 2023 |
| 2022 |
|
Audit Fees(1) | $1,405,000 |
| $1,306,000 |
|
Audit-Related Fees(2) | 88,000 |
| — |
|
Tax Fees(3) | 57,750 |
| 151,103 |
|
All Other Fees | — |
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2015 | Fiscal 2014 | |||||||
Audit Fees(1) | $ | 834,682 | $ | 814,300 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees(2) | — | — | ||||||
Tax Fees(3) | $ | 13,400 | $ | 218,350 | ||||
All Other Fees | — | — |
|
|
|
Deloitte did not provide any services to SpartanNash or its subsidiaries related to financial information systems design and implementation during the past two fiscal years.
Audit Committee Approval PoliciesAUDIT COMMITTEE APPROVAL POLICIES
The Audit Committee Charter sets forth the policy and procedures for the approval by the Audit Committee of all services provided by Deloitte. The charterCharter requires that the Audit Committee pre-approve all services provided by the independent auditors, including audit-related services and non-audit services. The charterCharter allows the Audit Committee to delegate to one or more members of the Audit Committee the authority to approve the independent auditors’ services. The decisions of any Audit Committee member to whom authority is delegated to pre-approve services are reported to the full Audit Committee. The charterCharter also provides that the Audit Committee has authority and responsibility to approve and authorize payment of the independent auditors’ fees. Finally, the charterCharter sets forth certain services that the independent auditors are prohibited from providing to SpartanNash or its subsidiaries. All of the services described above were approved by the Audit Committee. None of the audit-related fees or tax fees were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to thede minimusminimis exception set forth in Section 10A(i)(1)(B)Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, although the Audit Committee Charter allows such approval.SEC.
55 |
|
The Board of Directors has appointed the Audit Committee to assist the Board in fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities with respect to accounting, auditing, financial reporting, internal controls, and legal compliance. The Committee oversees management and the independent public accounting firm in the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of the Company’s financial statements. The Committee serves as a focal point for communication among the Board, the independent public accounting firm, the internal auditors and management with regard to accounting, reporting, and internal controls.
The Committee acts under a charterCharter which has been adopted by the Board of Directors and is available on the Company’s website at www.spartannash.com.www.spartannash.com. The Audit Committee reviews the adequacy of the charterCharter at least annually. The Board of Directors annually reviews the standards for independence for audit committee members under the Nasdaq Listing Rules and has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent. The Board of Directors has also determined that threetwo members of the Audit Committee are audit committee financial experts under Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
Management of the Company is responsible for the preparation, presentation, and integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s accounting and financial reporting, the Company’s disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent public accountants areaccounting firm is responsible for auditing the Company’s financial statements, expressing an opinion as to their conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, and providing an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
The Audit Committee has reviewed, and discussed with management and Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”), the Company’s independent accountants,public accounting firm, the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016,December 30, 2023, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and the independent accountants’Deloitte’s attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent accountantsDeloitte the matters required to be discussed under applicable auditing standards.requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountants required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’sDeloitte’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent accountants theirDeloitte its independence. This included consideration of the compatibility of non-audit services with the accountants’Deloitte’s independence.
Based on the reviews and discussions described above, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in SpartanNash’s annual report on Form 10-K for the periodyear ended January 2, 2016.December 30, 2023.
Respectfully submitted,
Mickey P. Foret, Chair
M. Shân Atkins, Chair
Dr. Frank M. GambinoFred Bentley, Jr.
Elizabeth A. NickelsKerrie D. MacPherson
Jaymin B. Patel
Hawthorne L. Proctor
The information contained in the “Audit Committee Report” is not considered to be “soliciting material,” “filed” or incorporated by reference in any past or future filing by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of 1933 unless and only to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
56 |
|
The following table sets forth the number of shares of SpartanNash common stock reported to be beneficially owned by (i) each person or group which is known to the Company to be a beneficial owner of 5% or more of SpartanNash’s outstanding shares of common stock, as of January 2, 2016, and(ii) each of our directors and nominees for director and each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table below (each, an “NEO”) and (iii) all directors, nominees for director and executive officers of SpartanNash as a group are deemed to have beneficially owned as of January 2, 2016.group. Information reported with respect to SpartanNash directors, director nominees and officers is based on ownership as of March 27, 2024, the record date for the Annual Meeting; information with respect to other beneficial owners other than SpartanNash nominees, directors, and officers is based entirely on the most recent Schedule 13-G or amendmentinformation filed by the listed partybeneficial owner with the SEC as of April 5, 2016,March 27, 2024, and the Company assumes no responsibility for such reports. Ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock is indicated by asterisk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner | Sole | Sole | Shared | Shared | Total | Percent |
|
5% Owners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock, Inc.(2) | 6,274,295 | 6,414,624 | — | — | 6,414,624 | 18.6% |
|
The Vanguard Group(3) | — | 3,020,117 | 51,722 | 82,709 | 3,102,826 | 9.0% |
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(4) | 2,767,035 | 2,809,909 | — | — | 2,809,909 | 8.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Shân Atkins | 53,759 | 53,759 | — | — | 53,759 | * |
|
Fred Bentley, Jr. | 1,842 | — | — | — | 1,842 | * |
|
Douglas A. Hacker | 62,627 | 62,627 | — | — | 62,627 | * |
|
Kerrie D. MacPherson | 3,739 | — | — | — | 3,739 | * |
|
Julien R. Mininberg | 10,600 | 10,600 | — | — | 10,600 | * |
|
Jason Monaco | 46,241 | 23,892 | — | — | 46,241 | * |
|
Bennett Morgan | 10,622 | 3,582 | — | — | 10,622 | * |
|
Jaymin B. Patel | 10,600 | 10,600 | — | — | 10,600 | * |
|
Hawthorne L. Proctor | 25,488 | 25,488 | — | — | 25,488 | * |
|
Pamela S. Puryear, Ph.D. | 10,600 | 10,600 | — | — | 10,600 | * |
|
Tony B. Sarsam | 150,101 | 95,071 | — | — | 150,101 | * |
|
David Sisk | 4,920 | 4,920 | — | — | 4,920 | * |
|
Masiar Tayebi | 17,946 | 10,592 | — | — | 17,946 | * |
|
William R. Voss | 15,248 | 15,248 | — | — | 15,248 | * |
|
All directors and current executive officers as a group (17 persons) | 485,694 | 366,837 | — | — | 485,694 | 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner | Sole Voting Power | Sole Dispositive Power | Shared Voting or Dispositive Power | Total Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class(1)(2) | |||||||||||||||
5% Owners | ||||||||||||||||||||
BlackRock Inc.(3) | 3,422,114 | 3,515,804 | — | 3,515,804 | 9.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(4) | 3,086,664 | 3,211,120 | — | 3,211,120 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Nominees, Directors, and Officers | * | |||||||||||||||||||
Theodore Adornato | 89,739 | — | — | 89,739 | * | |||||||||||||||
M. Shân Atkins | 41,299 | — | — | 41,299 | * | |||||||||||||||
Dennis Eidson | 317,439 | — | 2,400 | 319,839 | * | |||||||||||||||
Mickey P. Foret | 17,692 | — | — | 17,692 | * | |||||||||||||||
Dr. Frank M. Gambino | 34,671 | — | — | 34,671 | * | |||||||||||||||
Douglas A. Hacker | 22,665 | — | — | 22,665 | * | |||||||||||||||
Yvonne R. Jackson | 19,496 | — | — | 19,496 | * | |||||||||||||||
Derek R. Jones | 81,240 | — | — | 81,240 | * | |||||||||||||||
Kathleen M. Mahoney | 48,452 | — | — | 48,452 | * | |||||||||||||||
Elizabeth A. Nickels | 40,116 | — | — | 40,116 | * | |||||||||||||||
Timothy J. O’Donovan | 45,817 | — | 5,000 | 50,817 | * | |||||||||||||||
Hawthorne L. Proctor | 13,649 | — | — | 13,649 | * | |||||||||||||||
David M. Staples | 125,975 | — | — | 125,975 | * | |||||||||||||||
Craig C. Sturken | 60,419 | — | — | 60,419 | * | |||||||||||||||
William R. Voss | 37,348 | — | — | 37,348 | * | |||||||||||||||
All directors, nominees and executive officers as a group (19 persons) | 1,220,205 | — | 7,400 | 1,227,605 | 3.3 | % |
57 |
|
OWNERSHIP OF SPARTANNASH STOCK (cont’d)
|
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
SpartanNash’s executive officers are appointed annually by, and serve at the pleasure of, the Board or the Chief Executive Officer.
Biographical information for our Chief Executive Officer Mr. EidsonSarsam is included above in the “Board of Directors” section of this proxy statement. The following sets forth biographical information as of the date of this proxy statement concerning SpartanNash’s other executive officers who are not directors:officers:
Theodore C. Adornato (age 62)Ileana McAlary (age 49) has served as Executive Vice President, Retail OperationsChief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary since March 2023, and previously served as Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary since November 2021. Ms. McAlary oversees the Company's Legal, Compliance, Government Affairs, and Aviation departments, and serves as the Company's Chief Compliance Officer. She was previously the Vice President Associate General Counsel at Wolverine World Wide, Inc. from September 2016 to November 2021, where she also served as Compliance Officer and oversaw the company's regulatory compliance, corporate governance, indirect procurement, cybersecurity and global security functions. Prior to Wolverine World Wide, she held roles as Senior Counsel at Meijer, Inc. from 2013 to 2016, where she supported the Midwest grocer's retail, distribution and pharmacy operations; as Corporate Counsel III at Amway Corporation from February2006 to 2013 where she supported the company's Latin America and European legal operations; and as an attorney at the Miller Johnson law firm from 2003 to January 2013. From January 20132006. In October 2022, Ms. McAlary was appointed to November 2013, Mr. Adornatothe Davenport University Board of Trustees. She was recognized as one of Inforum's 2023 Inner Circle Honorees and Derek R. Jones exchanged duties, with Mr. Adornato servingis a 2024 West Michigan Brilliance Award Woman of the Year Award finalist.
Amy McClellan (age 44) has served as Executive Vice President, Wholesale Operations,Chief Customer Officer since December 2023. She previously served as partthe Company's Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer overseeing retail and distribution marketing, including insights and analytics, digital marketing and eCommerce operations, creative services, and OwnBrands strategies since 2022. Ms. McClellan joined SpartanNash in 2019 when the Company acquired Martin’s Super Markets. During her 20 years with Martin’s, Amy worked in a variety of an effortstore operations roles and advanced to promoteleadership positions in marketing, merchandising and operations. She played a greater exchangecritical role in the SpartanNash acquisition of knowledgeMartin’s, leading to her appointment as Division Vice President, Retail for SpartanNash. In March 2021, Amy was promoted to Vice President, Fresh Merchandising, overseeing the fresh product categories across 140+ company-operated stores and perspective between2,100 independent customer locations. Ms. McClellan serves on the Company’s two business operations,SpartanNash Foundation Board of Trustees and provide new leadership opportunities for membersformerly served on the Ohio-based Buehler’s Fresh Foods Board of Directors from October 2021 to December 2023. She is a two-time Top Women in Grocery honoree (2018, 2020) and was recognized in 2019 as a NextGen 40 under 40 award winner by Progressive Grocer.
Jason Monaco (age 47) has served as Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer since March 2021. Previously, Mr. Monaco served as the Chief Financial Officer of Cornerstone Chemical Company, a global producer of intermediate chemicals, and served as Chief Financial Officer of Borden Dairy Company, a dairy processor and distributor, from December 2018 until August 2020, where he led the company through a restructuring, reorganization and successful sale. Mr. Monaco also served as Vice President, Finance of Celanese Corporation, a technology and specialty materials company from 2016 through 2018. He was Vice President, Finance & Treasurer of Arrow Electronics from 2014 to 2016. He began his career with Kimberly-Clark in 1998 and advanced through the organization holding finance positions of increasing responsibility, including Vice President, FP&A and Regional CFO of its executive team. Before joining the Company, Mr. AdornatoLatin American and South Asian businesses.
58 |
|
SpartanNash’s Executive Officers
Bennett Morgan (age 44) has served as RegionalExecutive Vice President Chief Merchandising Officer since September 2023, and previously served as Senior Vice President Chief Merchandising Officer since January 2022. Prior to joining SpartanNash, he served as Fresh Category Leader for Amazon, from May 2020 to January 2022, where he oversaw produce and protein products, and previously managed center store products as well. Prior to Amazon, Mr. Morgan served as Vice President, Merchandising Operations for Walmart China and Japan, from 2018 through 2020, where he managed all non-buying portions of Tops Markets, L.L.C., Eastern Region, a subsidiary of Royal Ahold,the merchandising organization, and he served as Vice President, Cost Analytics at Walmart Asia from 1998March 2017 to 2003. Previously,May 2018. Mr. Adornato held various management positions with Tops MarketsMorgan also spent several years at H-E-B where he led initiatives in store operations, supply chain, manufacturing and Acme Markets, Inc.merchandising and he spent time at the Boston Consulting Group and Citibank.
Edward L. BrunotDavid Petko (age 52)51) has served as Executive Vice President and President of MDV since the Merger. Prior to the Merger, Mr. Brunot served with Nash Finch as Executive Vice President and President and Chief OperatingSupply Chain Officer of MDV since March 2012. Mr. Brunot served as Nash Finch’s Senior Vice President2022, and President and Chief Operating Officer of MDV from February 2009 to March 2012. Mr. Brunot joined Nash Finch in July 2006 as Senior Vice President, Military. Mr. Brunot previously served as Senior Vice President Operations for AmeriCold Logistics, LLC from December 2002 to May 2006, where he was responsible for 29 distribution facilities in the Western Region. Before that, Mr. Brunot was Vice President of Operations for CS Integrated from 1999 to 2002. Mr. Brunot served as a Captain in the United States Army and holds a BS degree from the United States Military Academy, West Point and an MS degree from the University of Scranton.
David deS. Couch(age 65) has served as Vice President Chief InformationSupply Chain Officer since the Merger. From 1996 until the Merger, he served as the Company’s Vice President Information Technology. From 1991 to 1996,April 2021. Mr. Couch was our Director of Information Technology. Prior to joining Spartan Stores in 1987, Mr. Couch was a Product Manager for the Colorado Telecommunication Division of Hewlett Packard Corporation, Technical Services Manager for the Loveland Instrument Division of Hewlett Packard Corporation, and Manager of Computer Services at General Foods Corporation in Battle Creek Michigan, and on the Processing Facilities Design Team for General Foods in White Plains, New York. Mr. Couch has taught college classes in communications and data center management. He holds a BS degree in Business Administration and a MS degree in Computer Science from University of Arizona.
Derek R. Jones(age 47) was promoted to the position of Executive Vice President, President of Wholesale and Distribution Operations in March 2015. Prior to his promotion, Mr. Jones served as Executive Vice President Food Distribution since November 2013 and from June 2009 until his exchange of duties with Mr. Adornato (as noted above) in January 2013. Mr. Jones served as Spartan Stores’ Executive Vice President Supply Chain from September 2006 until June 2009. From March 2004 to August 2006, Mr. Jones was Vice President of Distribution for Unisource Worldwide, Inc., a marketer and distributor of printing and imaging systems and equipment. From July 2000 to March 2004, Mr. Jones was Regional Vice President of Supply Chain Operations for Office Depot, Inc., a global supplier of office products and services.
SPARTANNASH’S EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (cont’d)
Jerry L. Jones(age 64) has served as Senior Vice President Human Resources since October 2012 and previously served as Vice President Human Resources since joining the Company in 2009. Mr. JonesPetko previously served as Senior Vice President Human Resources of Jitney Jungle StoresSupply Chain for C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc., a wholesale distributor of America, a supermarket chain in the Southeastern U.S. that was acquired by Winn Dixie.
Kathleen M. Mahoney (age 61) was appointed Executivefood and grocery store items, from April 2009 to April 2021. During his 11-year tenure with C&W Wholesale Grocers, he also served as Regional Vice President Chief Legal Officer in November 2015. She continuesof Operations from 2014 to serve as Secretary. Prior2019; Senior Director ES3/D2S from 2013 to this most recent appointment, she served as Executive Vice President2014; Director of Operations from 2012 to 2013; and General Counsel since the Merger. Ms. Mahoney oversees the Company’s legal, aviation, corporate communications, community development, and government relations functions. PriorManager of two facilities from 2009 to the Merger, Ms. Mahoney served as Executive Vice President General Counsel and Secretary for Nash Finch, where she oversaw legal, aviation, risk management, asset protection, safety, environmental, and insurance procurement and claims management. Ms. Mahoney served in several executive and managerial positions with Nash Finch since joining the company in 2004. Prior to working at Nash Finch, she was the Managing Partner of the St. Paul office of Larson King, LLP. Previously, she spent 13 years with the law firm of Oppenheimer, Wolff & Donnelly, LLP, where she served in a number of capacities including Chair of the Labor and Employment Practice Group and Managing Partner of the St. Paul office. Ms. Mahoney served as Special Assistant Attorney General in the Minnesota Attorney General’s office for six years. She clerked for the Honorable Douglas K. Amdahl, Minnesota Supreme Court Justice and the Honorable Neal P. McCurn, United States District Court Judge for the Northern District of New York.2012.
Larry Pierce (age 61) Larry PierceThomas Swanson (age 63) has served as Executive Vice President Merchandising and MarketingGeneral Manager, Corporate Retail since July 2014, andMarch 2021. He previously served in that position on an interim basis from August 2013 to July 2014. From 2008 to 2014, Mr. Pierce was theas Senior Vice President Center Store Merchandising for SpartanNash. Mr. Pierce joined the Company in 2008 after serving in a variety of positions with Coca-Cola Enterprises, includingand General Manager, Corporate Retail from 2018 to 2020, Vice President of SalesSpartanNash’s Retail-West operations from 2013 to 2018, and Vice President, Retail Merchandising from 2012 to 2013. Mr. Swanson also held executive retail supermarket positions for the Supermarket, Massover 30 years with Bashas’ Markets and Convenience channels.Nash Finch.
David M. Staples (age 53)Masiar Tayebi (age 45) has served as Executive Vice President, Chief OperatingStrategy and Information Officer since March 2015. Mr. Staples also performed the duties of Chief Financial Officer on an interim basis until April 11, 2016, when Christopher Meyers joined the Company. Prior to his promotion, Mr. StaplesOctober 2022, and previously served as Executive Vice President since November 2000 and Chief FinancialStrategy Officer since January 2000. Mr. Staples alsoApril 2021. He previously served as Vice President FinanceGlobal Head of Corporate Strategy and Business Development at Whirlpool Corporation, a home appliance manufacturer, from January 2000May 2014 to November 2000.April 2021, responsible for acquisitions including Yummly, a leading digital food platform offering online grocery delivery. After acquiring Yummly in 2017, Mr. Staples oversees the Company’s Food Distribution, Retail, and Military segments. In addition, he oversees information technology, real estate, finance, treasury, and risk management. From December 1998 to January 2000, Mr. StaplesTayebi served as Divisional Vice President Strategic PlanningChief Operating Officer at Yummly, executing Whirlpool’s innovation growth strategy. Prior to leadership roles at Whirlpool, Mr. Tayebi was an Executive Director at UBS focusing on strategy, M&A, technology and Reporting of Kmart Corporation and from June 1997 to December 1998 he served as Divisional Vice President Accounting Operations.transformational change. He is a certified public accountant.also worked with various Fortune 500 clients on strategic initiatives during his time in management consulting.
59 |
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The Board of Directors has appointed the Compensation Committee to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to compensation of the Company’s executive officers and the Company’s compensation and benefit programs and policies.officers. The Compensation Committee determines and implements the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, structure, policies and programs, and administers and interprets the Company’s compensation and benefit plans.programs.
Our named executive officers for fiscal 2015 were:
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Our compensation programs are designed to attract and retain leadership talent consistent with our performance goals. The following discussion provides information regarding the achievements that the executive compensation program isprograms are designed to reward, the elements of the executive compensation program,programs, the reasons why we employ each element and how we determine amounts paid. Key achievements of the Company during 2023 included:
(1) Comprised of $18.6 million in share repurchases and $29.7 million in dividends. (2) A reconciliation of net earnings to Our named executive officers (“NEOs” or “named executive officers”) for 2023 were: Name Title Tony B. Sarsam President and Jason Monaco Executive Vice President and Chief David Sisk Executive Vice President Executive SummaryHighlightsBusiness ContextIn fiscal 2015, we continuedshare repurchasesbuild on$52.2 million, expanding net margin by 18 basis points compared to the solid foundation we have established over the past two years, delivering anotherprior year of earningsa challenging environment. Although we face economic and competitive headwinds, we believe we have positioned the Company for continued earnings growthprofitability with $257.4 million in 2016 and beyond. Key accomplishments include:•Earnings Growth.Earnings per share increased 7%adjusted EBITDA(2), expanding adjusted EBITDA margin by 13(2) basis points compared to $1.66 per diluted share for fiscal 2015 (including the impact of the 53rd week in fiscal 2014).•Increased Cash Flow. The Company generated $219.5 million in cash flow from operations, a 58% increase from the prior year.•Reduced Debt. The Company reduced its long-term debt by $75 million.•Increased Dividends. The Board of Directors increased the dividend rate by 12.5% for fiscal 2015, and approved an additional 11% increase for fiscal 2016.Executive Compensation Decisions in Fiscal 2015 — In GeneralThe Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s policies and programs in effect during fiscal 2015 provided competitive compensation that rewarded executive performance. Consequently, it generally did not make significant changes to the Company’s compensation programs or policies in fiscal 2015.31SpartanNash Company Proxy StatementEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)Chief Executive Officer CompensationFor fiscal 2015, the Board approved the following changes to our CEO’s compensation:Mr. Eidson’s equity incentive compensation and long-term cash incentive compensation opportunity (at the target level) were increased by 20% over the prior yearmove his compensation closer to the median level for CEO’s at similar companies.No change was made to Mr. Eidson’s annual incentive opportunity asadjusted EBITDA, a percentagenon-GAAP financial measure, and a calculation of his salary.Mr. Eidson received a 3% increaseadjusted EBITDA margin is provided in base salary.Appendix A.Mr. Eidson’s(3) Retail market share is total compensation (as shown on the Summary Compensation Table) increased 19% over the prior year, driven primarilyRetail segment sales divided by the fact that certain long-term cash incentive awards were earned in 2015, while no such awards were scheduled to be earned in 2014. This increase was partially offset by a 22% decrease in Mr. Eidson’s annual cash incentive compensation due to relatively lower consolidated net earnings performance.total addressable Retail market. The total addressable Retail market is determined based on first-party research around the footprints of each Retail store, validated with NielsenIQ market data and the U.S. Bureau of Labor food expenditures.Other Named Executive Officer Compensation•Annual Cash Incentive. The Company’s adjusted consolidated net earnings performance was approximately 98% of target, resulting in a payout of 92% of target annual cash incentive for awards based on corporate performance.•Long Term Cash Incentive. The Company’s Adjusted EPS, net sales,merger synergies performance for fiscal 2015 was 99%, 95%, and 153% of target, respectively. As a result, our named executive officers (other than Ms. Mahoney, who joined the Company after the award was made) earned a long-term cash incentive award at 93%, 75%, and 200% of target, respectively, for those metrics.Chief Executive Officer ("CEO")•Promotion of David Staples. In March 2015, David M. Staples was promoted to Operating Officer. In conjunction with this promotion, Mr. Staples received a base salary increase of 20%,Financial Officer ("EVP and a 42% increase in his long-term cash and equity incentive compensation at the target level.CFO")•Promotion of Derek Jones . Mr. Jones was promoted to President of Wholesale and Distribution Operations in March 2015. Mr. Jones received a base salary increase of 19%, and his annual cash incentive opportunity at the target level was increased by 15% from 55% of salary to 70% of salary. Mr. Jones also received a 28% increase in his long-term cash and equity compensation opportunity at the target level. Mr. Jones received an additional grant of restricted stock having a grant date fair value of approximately $450,000 which will be subject to a five-year service condition and will vest in full (“cliff vest”) on March 1, 2020.•Promotion of Kathleen Mahoney and other compensation actions. Ms. Mahoney was promoted to Chief LegalCustomer Officer in November 2015. In conjunction with this promotion, Ms. Mahoney received a salary increase of 12%. Ms. Mahoney also earned a retention bonus on the second anniversary of the merger. Mr. Adornato and Ms. Mahoney each received an 8% increase in long-term cash and equity incentive compensation at the target level.32SpartanNash Company Proxy StatementEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
Plan Design Changes
No changes were made to the overall design of the annual incentive plan or long-term cash incentive plan for fiscal 2015, except that that adjusted EBITDA replaced merger synergies as a performance metric in the long-term cash incentive plan.
In 2015, the Company adopted two shareholder-approved plans: the SpartanNash Company Stock Incentive Plan of 2015 and the SpartanNash Company Amended and Restated Executive Cash Incentive Plan of 2015. Each plan replaced an expiring plan.
Stock and cash incentive award opportunities granted to our named executive officers in 2016 have been made under the plans approved in 2015.
The Executive Cash Incentive Plan is substantially the same as its predecessor plan
The Stock Incentive Plan of 2015 is similar to its predecessor plan, but the 2015 plan eliminates automatic vesting of awards upon a change in control and includes one year minimum vesting period for awards.
Compensation Decisions for Fiscal 2016
For fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee approved a change to the annual incentive award. The award for 2016 will be based in part on adjusted consolidated net earnings (80%) and on net sales (20%). Previously, the award was based entirely on adjusted consolidated net earnings.
The Compensation Committee also adjusted the metrics for the long-term cash incentive award. The award for the period covering fiscal 2016 through fiscal 2018 will be based on earnings per share (40%), adjusted consolidated EBITDA (40%), and the remaining 20% will be based on return on invested capital (“ROIC”). The ROIC component replaces net sales.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
Pay Practices
The Committee also reviews the Company’s compensation programs to use best practices and avoid poor pay practices. Below is a summary of certain practices we have implemented to serve our compensation philosophies, and certain practices we have avoided because we believe they do not serve our shareholders’ long-term interests.
|
| ||
| Executive Vice President and | ||
| Executive Vice President and Chief Merchandising Officer(2) | ||
| |||
| |||
|
In addition to the elements of compensation discussed above, our executives participate in certain defined benefit and deferred compensation plans. These plans are discussed below under the captions “Pension Benefits,” “Qualified Defined Contribution Retirement Plan,” and “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation.”
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
Clawback Policy
The Company maintains a clawback policy providing that under certain circumstances, the Company may recover incentive compensation paid to any current or former associate holding a position of Vice President or a more senior position. The compensation is recoverable if: (a) there is a restatement of all or a portion of the Company’s financial statements due to material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements, (b) the incentive compensation was based on materially inaccurate financial statements or performance metrics, or (c) the associate engaged in ethical misconduct, serious wrongdoing, or violation of applicable legal or regulatory requirements. The Company may recover any incentive compensation paid within the three years prior to the applicable event or conduct.
Mix of Compensation Elements
When determining the mix of awards, the Compensation Committee considers factors such as the short-term and long-term compensation expense to the Company, the economic value delivered to the executives, the overall level of share ownership by the executives, share availability under Company plans, annual share usage and dilution of shareholders, and practices at the Peer Group Companies.
Pay for Performance
Our executive compensation elements and programs reflect our “pay for performance” philosophy. The Compensation Committee and the Board have implemented and intend to maintain compensation plans that link a substantial portion of executive compensation to the achievement of goals that the Board considers important.
As a result of this general policy, a substantial portion of the compensation paid to our executives is incentive-based and therefore “at-risk.” The value of restricted stock awards to our named executive officers depends on the value of the share price. Our executive officers do not realize value from annual or long-term cash incentive awards under the Company’s Executive Cash Incentive Plan of 2010 (the “Executive Plan”) unless the Company meets specified minimum financial goals. The tables above illustrate the importance of at-risk compensation in our compensation programs.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
The tables below present analysis of the pay for performance relationship for the most recently available data (2012 through 2014). The purpose of the analysis is to evaluate whether the Company’s CEO compensation programs are aligned with the Company’s total shareholder return (“TSR”), as measured against the Peer Group Companies. The analysis reflects that CEO realizable compensation was reasonably aligned with total shareholder return for the period. For the purposes of this analysis, “realizable compensation” includes base salary, annual incentives, intrinsic value of options, restricted stock, and performance plan payouts. The Company believes that this analysis supports the Compensation Committee’s view that the performance-based long-term cash incentive plan has contributed to the alignment of the CEO’s pay and performance.
Analysis of Compensation Elements for Fiscal 2015
Overview
The following is a discussion of key compensation programs and decisions for fiscal 2015.
1. Base Salaries
The Compensation Committee approved a 3% increase in Mr. Eidson’s base salary for fiscal 2015. The other named executive officers received base salary increases ranging from 3% to 20%, as discussed above.
2. Annual Cash Incentive Awards.
Each named executive officer was granted an opportunity to earn an annual incentive award under the Executive Plan. For Messrs. Eidson and Staples, and Ms. Mahoney, the value of the annual incentive award is dependent on the Company’s achievement of specified levels of adjusted consolidated net earnings and is paid in cash. For Mr. Adornato and Mr. Jones, a portion of their annual incentive award is based on the performance of their respective business units. Specifically, 25% of Mr. Adornato’s award is based on retail performance, and 25% of Mr. Jones’ annual incentive award is based on a combination of individual performance, Food Distribution performance, and MDV performance; the remaining 75% of each award is based on corporate performance. For all named executive officers, if the threshold level of adjusted consolidated net earnings is not achieved, then no award is paid for the fiscal year, regardless of business unit performance.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE AWARD PAYOUT DESIGN
Adjusted Consolidated Net Earnings (in thousands) | Percentage of Targeted Consolidated Net Earnings Achieved for Fiscal 2015 | Percent of Target Annual Incentive Award Paid* | ||||||||||
Threshold | $ | 59,427 | 80.0 | % | 10.0 | % | ||||||
Target | 74,284 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Maximum | 86,392 | 116.3 | % | 200.0 | % | |||||||
Actual** | 72,846 | 98.1 | % | 91.5 | % |
3. Long-Term Incentive Awards
The long-term incentive award opportunity provided to executive officers consists of mix of restricted stock and multi-year performance-based cash awards. The Company continued this program (illustrated in the table below) for fiscal 2015. Each long term opportunity award consisted of:
50% restricted stock; and
50% cash, based on the achievement of metrics described below.
Long-Term Cash Incentive Awards. In February 2015, each named executive officer was granted an opportunity to earn a long-term cash incentive award under the Executive Plan, to be earned and vested over a three-year period. Each awards is based on three metrics:
The portion of the February 2015 award opportunity for each named executive officer is as follows:
|
| |||
| ||||
| ||||
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
The amount of each component of the long-term incentive award earned for the three year performance period will be determined according to the following matrices (the percentage of Target long-term cash incentive award paid is interpolated for actual achievement between the threshold and maximum performance levels identified in each table):
FEBRUARY 2015 LONG-TERM CASH AWARD
ADJUSTED EPS COMPONENT
Percentage of Earnings Per Share Achieved | Percent of Target Long-Term Cash Incentive Award Paid | |||||||
<80 | % | 0 | % | |||||
Threshold | 80.0 | % | 10.0 | % | ||||
Target | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Maximum | ³116.3 | % | 200.0 | % |
FEBRUARY 2015 LONG-TERM CASH AWARD
ADJUSTED EBITDA COMPONENT
Percentage of Adjusted EBITDA Achieved | Percent of Target Long-Term Cash Incentive Award Paid | |||||||
<90 | % | 0 | % | |||||
Threshold | 90.0 | % | 50.0 | % | ||||
Target | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Maximum | ³105.0 | % | 200.0 | % |
FEBRUARY 2015 LONG-TERM CASH AWARD
NET SALES COMPONENT
Percentage of Net Sales Achieved | Percent of Target Long-Term Cash Incentive Award Paid | |||||||
<80 | % | 0 | % | |||||
Threshold | 90.0 | % | 50.0 | % | ||||
Target | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Maximum | ³106.0 | % | 200.0 | % |
The potential values of the long-term cash incentive award for each named executive officer are set forth below.
Name | Adjusted EPS (40%) | Adjusted EBITDA 40%) | Net Sales (20%) | Target Long-Term Cash Incentive Award Value ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Max. ($) | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Max. ($) | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Max. ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eidson | 48,000 | 480,000 | 960,000 | 240,000 | 480,000 | 960,000 | 120,000 | 240,000 | 480,000 | 1,200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Staples | 15,600 | 156,000 | 312,000 | 78,000 | 156,000 | 312,000 | 39,000 | 78,000 | 156,000 | 390,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jones | 8,980 | 89,800 | 179,600 | 44,900 | 89,800 | 179,600 | 22,450 | 44,900 | 89,800 | 224,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adornato | 7,560 | 75,600 | 151,200 | 37,800 | 75,600 | 151,200 | 18,900 | 37,800 | 75,600 | 189,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mahoney | 7,560 | 75,600 | 151,200 | 37,800 | 75,600 | 151,200 | 18,900 | 37,800 | 75,600 | 189,000 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
The following table shows the status of all outstanding long-term incentive cash awards as of January 2, 2016 under the long-term cash incentive program.
Award Date | Performance Measure | Performance Period | Actual Performance1 as % of Target | Payout Earned | End of Service Period | Payout Due | ||||||||||
February 25, 2015
| Adj. EPS | FYE 12/30/17 | TBD | TBD | 12/30/17 | |||||||||||
Net Sales | FYE 12/30/17 | TBD | TBD | 12/30/17 | After fiscal 2017 | |||||||||||
EBITDA | FYE 12/30/17 | TBD | TBD | 12/30/17 | ||||||||||||
February 27, 2014 | Adj. EPS | FYE 12/31/16 | TBD | TBD | 12/31/16 | After fiscal 2016
| ||||||||||
Net Sales | FYE 12/31/16 | TBD | TBD | 12/31/16 | ||||||||||||
Merger Synergies | FYE 12/31/16 | TBD | TBD | 12/31/16 | ||||||||||||
May 14, 2013, as modified | Adj. EPS | FYE 1/2/16 | 98.5 | % | 93.3 | % | May 2016 | May 20162
| ||||||||
Net Sales | FYE 1/2/16 | 95.1 | % | 75.5 | % | May 2016 | ||||||||||
Merger Synergies | FYE 1/2/16 | 153.3 | % | 200.0 | % | May 2016 | ||||||||||
May 14, 2013, as modified
| Adj. EPS | FYE 12/28/13 | 108.6 | % | 152.8 | % | May 2016 | May 20162
| ||||||||
ROIC | FYE 12/28/13 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | May 2016 |
|
60 |
|
|
Executive Compensation
Objectives of SpartanNash’s Compensation Programs
The primary objectives of the Company’s executive compensation programs are to:
•
•
|
•
•
•
61 |
|
Executive Compensation
Pay Practices
The Compensation Committee also reviews the Company’s executive compensation programs to incorporate commonly viewed best practices and avoid poor pay practices. Below is a summary of certain practices we have implemented to support our compensation philosophies, and certain practices we reject because we believe they do not serve our shareholders’ long-term interests.
The practices |
| At-risk compensation. A majority of the compensation paid to our named executive officers is “at-risk” and requires specific and disclosed financial performance, continued employment, or both; |
| Pay for performance. Payouts under our annual and long-term cash incentive awards for named executive officers are based on attainment of pre-established goals — both short-term and long-term metrics and targets; | |
| Double-trigger severance arrangements. Our severance agreements provide for double-trigger payments upon a change in control; | |
| Double-trigger equity vesting. Our equity incentive award agreements provide for double-trigger vesting of equity awards upon a change in control (effective with 2023, all executive long-term incentives are entirely equity-based and subject to double-trigger); | |
| Executive stock ownership and retention requirements. Each executive is required to hold at least 50% of the net shares (after taxes) acquired through the Company’s stock incentive plans and other forms of stock-based compensation until the executive has achieved the required level of ownership; and | |
| Clawback policy. Incentive compensation paid to executives is subject to recovery in the event of certain financial restatements, materially inaccurate financial statements or inaccurate metrics (not resulting in a material restatement), or executive misconduct. |
The practices we |
| Provide guaranteed salary increases; |
| Provide guaranteed bonuses; | |
| Allow hedging or pledging of Company stock by officers, directors, or Associates; | |
| Provide excessive perquisites; | |
| Provide excise tax gross-ups in change in control agreements; or | |
| Allow repricing of options without shareholder approval. |
62 |
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)Executive Compensation
Shareholder Say-On-Pay Votes
The Company provides its shareholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on executive compensation (" say-on-pay") annually. At the Company’s Annual Meeting held in May 2023, over 91% of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal were voted in favor of the proposal. The Compensation Committee believes this result affirms shareholders’ support of the Company’s approach to executive compensation, and did not change its approach in 2023 in response to the May 2023 say-on-pay vote. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of the Company’s say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers.
How the Compensation Committee Determines Compensation Levels
The processes the Compensation Committee follows when determining pay levels are discussed in more detail below.
Overview
The Compensation Committee’s overall decision-making process is summarized as follows:
•
the Committee reviews publicly disclosed grants of share-based awards to named executive officers at the Peer Group Companies and other relevant companies;
the Company’s executive officers, and Human Resources, and Finance associatesAssociates serve as resources to the Compensation Committee and provide advice, information, analysis and documentation to the Compensation Committee upon request;
•
•
•
Competitive Market BenchmarkingAnalysis
In general, the Compensation Committee seeks to provide target compensation opportunities that are competitive with the market levels for each major category of compensation and in total for executives in similar positions at companies of comparable size, financial performance, industry and complexity. As part of this overall analysis, the Committee reviews survey data provided by its compensation consultants,consultant and engages in benchmarking ofa competitive market analysis with respect to selected companies (referred to as “Peer Group Companies”).
The Compensation Committee reviews the constituents of the Peer Group Companies from time to time to help ensure thatevaluate whether the group is fairlyviewed as comparable to the Company. Changing business models, mergers, growth, and other factors may necessitate adjustments. TheDuring 2023 and after considering the input of its independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee approved a revised group of Peer Group Companies. This new Peer Group Companies for fiscal 2015 werewas based on the group used to evaluate 2022 compensation decisions but with updates to better reflect companies viewed as follows:
SUPERVALU Inc.
CH Robinson Worldwide Inc.*
SYNNEX Corp.
Henry Schein, Inc.*
The Pantry, Inc.
WESCO International Inc.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
a competitive match in the same competitive market and/or industry as SpartanNash. As a result of this review, Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Ingles Markets, Inc. and Performance Food Group Company were removed and Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc., Steelcase, Inc., UFP Industries, Inc. and Wolverine World Wide, Inc. were added to the Peer Group Companies. The below Peer Group Companies were used to evaluate 2023 executive compensation decisions.
63 |
|
Executive Compensation
Casey’s General Stores, Inc.
Ryder System,
The Andersons, Inc. | Steelcase, Inc. | |
B&G Foods, Inc. | TreeHouse Foods, Inc. | |
BJ’s Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. | UFP Industries, Inc. | |
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. | United Natural Foods, Inc. | |
MRC Global Inc. | Univar Solutions Inc. | |
Owens & Minor, Inc. | US Foods Holding Corp. | |
Patterson Companies, Inc. | Veritiv Corporation | |
Schneider National, Inc. | Weis Markets, Inc. | |
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | WESCO International, Inc. | |
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. |
Anixter International Inc.
The Andersons, Inc.
United Natural Foods, Inc.
Roundy’s, Inc.*
For 2016,At the time the Peer Group Companies will excludewere approved, the companies identified with an asterisk (*)Company’s revenues and one-year TSR ranked above and will include Owens & Minor, Inc., Vertiv Corporation, and Essendent Inc.the median of the Peer Group Companies while its market capitalization ranked below the median.
In addition to determining the median level forof an element of a compensation category atamong the Peer Group Companies, the Committee analyzes competitive compensation practices in the general industry for those positions that may be occupied by officers and executives recruited from outside of the wholesale and retail grocery business and performs regression analysis to adjust to SpartanNash’s revenue size in these cases.
Market levels serve only as a reference point;point in evaluating executive compensation. In determining executive compensation, the Committee also considers:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Evaluating Individual Performance
Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews and evaluates individual executive performance as part of its decision makingdecision-making process. The Chairperson of the Compensation Committee coordinates the Board’s review of the individual performance of the Chief Executive Officer.Officer by the Board. The Chairman of the Board Lead Independent Director and the Chair of the Compensation Committee communicate the Board’s review to the Chief Executive Officer.
For the named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Executive Officer reviews with the Compensation Committee and the full Board of Directors an evaluation of each executive officer’s performance.
As discussed above, individual performance is only one factor among several that the Compensation Committee considers in making these adjustments,its decision-making process, and there is no prescribed formula or mechanism for translating individual performance into specific amounts of compensation. The Compensation Committee’s decision-making process necessarily involves the Committee’s informed judgment with respect to individual executive performance in the context of many considerations and criteria, none of which are individually controlling, including experience, potential of the executive, retention concerns, recentcurrent compensation of the executive, internal pay equity, Company performance, and general industry and economic conditions.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
Internal Pay Equity
The ratio between Chief Executive Officer compensation and other named executive officer compensation is used by some as an indicator of internal pay equity. For SpartanNash as of fiscal 2015, the ratio of the CEO’s target total direct compensation (salary, annual bonus opportunity, and long-term incentive opportunity) to the average target total direct compensation of the other named executive officers was 3.4 to 1. The Compensation Committee believes that this ratio is generally in line with the normal market range between 3.0 and 3.5 to 1.
Use of Independent Compensation ConsultantsConsultant
Since 2010, the Compensation Committee has engaged Willis Towers Watson (“WTW”), formerly Towers Watson,FW Cook is a compensation consulting firm that has provided such services to provide objective research and analysis regarding compensation best practices and current information regarding compensation levels at companies of similar type, size, and financial performance.the Compensation Committee since 2019. The Compensation Committee instructed WTWconsidered each of the factors required by Nasdaq in determining that FW Cook is an independent advisor and the Compensation Committee concluded that the work performed by FW Cook for the Compensation Committee did not raise any conflicts of interest.
64 |
|
Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee instructs its independent consultant to provide advice and guidance on executive compensation proposals, including changes to compensation levels, the design of incentive plans and other forms of compensation, changes to the Peer Group Companies and to provide information about market practices and trends. Typically, WTWthe independent consultant attends all regularly scheduled quarterly meetings of the Compensation Committee, meetings, reviews existing executive compensation programs for consistency with our executive compensation philosophy and current market practices, and produces the comparative information derived from peer groupour Peer Group Companies and published survey data that the Compensation Committee reviews when setting compensation.data. With respect to fiscal 2015, WTW’s2023, the activities of FW Cook included:
•
•
reviewing the composition of the peer group we use for executive compensation benchmarking purposes;
reviewing current issues and trends in executive compensation;
assisting with executive compensation disclosures for the annual proxy filing;
reviewing the pay-for-performance alignment of our executive compensation programs; and
Performing a market review of non-associate director compensation
The Compensation Committee has adopted the practice of engaging an independent compensation consultant to provide a full review and analysis of•
Mix of Compensation Committee requested and received a full review and analysis fromElements
When determining the compensation consultant in fiscal 2015. For years in which the consultant does not provide a full review,mix of awards, the Compensation Committee considers analysisfactors such as the short-term and long-term compensation expense to the Company, the economic value delivered to the executives, the overall level of namedshare ownership by the executives, share availability under the Company’s stock incentive plan, annual share usage and dilution, and practices at the Peer Group Companies. The award mix (at target level) for 2023 for our CEO, Mr. Sarsam, and the average award mix (at target level) of our other continuing NEOs is presented below.
In addition to the elements of compensation discussed above, our executives participate in certain defined contribution and deferred compensation plans. These plans are discussed below under the captions “Qualified Defined Contribution Retirement Plan” and “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation.”
Pay for Performance
Our executive officer compensation comparedelements and programs are designed to reflect our “pay-for-performance” philosophy. The Compensation Committee and the Board have implemented and intend to maintain compensation plans that link a substantial portion of executive compensation to the achievement of key performance measures and financial results that align with our long-term vision and growth objectives.
65 |
|
Executive Compensation
Analysis of Compensation Elements for 2023
Overview
Our executive compensation program has three main elements. The following table provides an overview of each element and how each is designed in support of our executive compensation philosophy.
Pay Element | Description | Objective |
Base salary | Fixed cash compensation based on role, pay equity and performance. | Provide competitive base annual compensation to attract and retain top talent. |
Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) | Variable, performance-based cash incentive based on a percentage of base salary. | Motivate our executives to achieve short-term (annual) business objectives within the context of our long-term strategic plan. |
Long-term incentive awards (LTIP) | Mix of variable, performance-based and time-based equity awards that are earned and vest over a multi-year period. | Align interest of executives with interests of stockholders, drive long-term performance, attract and retain key executives. |
The following is a discussion of key executive compensation programs and decisions for 2023.
Base salary provides our executives with a fixed base annual income and helps us attract and retain high-performing executives. The Compensation Committee sets executive salaries each year in light of individual performance reviews, internal pay equity considerations, the scope and complexity of the executive’s role and an assessment of compensation practices at the Peer Group Companies and reviewsmarket survey data provided by our independent compensation history, market trendsconsultant. The table below summarizes base salary decisions for our NEOs in 2023:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
| 2023 |
|
| 2022 |
| Percentage |
|
Mr. Sarsam |
| $1,000,000 | (1) |
| $900,000 |
| 11% |
|
Mr. Monaco |
| 600,000 | (1) |
| 515,000 |
| 17% |
|
Mr. Sisk |
| 410,000 |
|
| 400,000 |
| 2% |
|
Mr. Tayebi |
| 460,000 | (2) |
| 412,000 |
| 12% |
|
Mr. Morgan |
| 460,000 | (3) |
| 420,000 |
| 10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fiscal 2023 annual cash incentive compensation design remained unchanged from the prior year. Each named executive officer was granted an opportunity to earn an annual incentive award under the Company’s 2023 Annual Incentive Plan ("AIP"). Each of the NEO’s payout was determined entirely on performance against pre-determined consolidated Company performance goals to foster better communication and collaboration across all business units and align incentives to drive overall corporate performance.
The payout of the 2023 annual incentive award is dependent on the Company’s achievement of specified levels of Adjusted EBITDA, a metric chosen for its alignment with the Company’s long-term strategic plan and to incentivize profitable growth. Under the 2023 AIP, Adjusted EBITDA is defined as follows:
Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA” or “Adj. EBITDA”) is a non-GAAP operating financial measure that the Company defines as net earnings plus interest, discontinued operations, depreciation and amortization, and other non-cash items including share-based payments (equity awards measured in accordance with ASC 718, Stock Compensation, which include both stock-based compensation updated informationto employees and stock warrants issued to non-employees) and the LIFO provision.
66 |
|
Executive Compensation
For purposes of the AIP, the Compensation Committee may approve adjustments to Adjusted EBITDA for (a) asset write downs, (b) litigation or claim judgments or settlements, (c) changes in tax laws, accounting principles, or other laws or provisions affecting reported results, (d) any reorganization and restructuring programs, (e) extraordinary non-recurring items as described in ASC 225-20 Presentation-Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items and/or in management’s discussion and analysis providedof financial condition and results of operations appearing in the previousCompany’s annual report to shareholders for the applicable fiscal year(s), (f) acquisitions, divestitures or accounting changes, (g) foreign exchange gains and losses, and (h) other special charges or extraordinary items. Pursuant to the approved terms of the 2023 AIP, the Committee increased Adjusted EBITDA for legal and consulting fees related to the Company's exploration of potential acquisition targets during the year. Except for the adjustment related to fees, the AIP payout would have been 81.0%.
The formula for determining NEO payouts under the 2023 AIP is as follows:
The 2023 AIP payout percentage earned was determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjusted |
| Percentage of |
| Percentage of |
|
Below Threshold |
| <$235,000 |
| <88.7% |
| 0.0% |
|
Threshold |
| $235,000 |
| 88.7% |
| 25.0% |
|
Target |
| 265,000 |
| 100.0% |
| 100.0% |
|
Maximum |
| 291,500 |
| 110.0% |
| 200.0% |
|
Actual(2) |
| 258,184 |
| 97.4% |
| 83.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
Executive Compensation
For the NEOs, the target AIP, as a percentage of base salary, did not change as compared to the target opportunity established in 2022, other than Mr. Sisk and Mr. Morgan, as described below. The following table shows the target opportunity, payout percentage based on the results reported as compared to the table above and the amount earned under the 2023 AIP for each named executive officer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
| Target AIP |
| 2023 Payout |
| 2023 |
|
Mr. Sarsam |
| 125% |
| 83% |
| $1,019,543 |
|
Mr. Monaco |
| 75% |
| 83% |
| 364,342 |
|
Mr. Sisk1 |
| 60% |
| 83% |
| 194,300 |
|
Mr. Tayebi |
| 60% |
| 83% |
| 224,943 |
|
Mr. Morgan2 |
| 60% |
| 83% |
| 195,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning with fiscal year 2023, each executive officer is provided a long-term incentive award opportunity, delivered 100% in equity, that consists of a mix of PSUs and time-based restricted stock awards. Our long-term incentive mix delivers a significant component of each executive officer's total compensation that aligns with the interests of stockholders; and seeks to provide stability and a continuing stake in the company's success. The amounts of LTI awards are determined annually by the Compensation Committee after reviewing the competitive market analysis conducted by the compensation consultant. Alternate years provideconsultant and recommendations are made by the CEO for adjustments to his direct reports. The Compensation Committee and Board set the compensation level of the CEO annually after the competitive market analysis is performed by the Committee’s consultant and the annual performance review of the CEO is conducted.
Description of Long-Term Incentive Plan Design Changes. As part of the ongoing review of executive compensation practices, the Compensation Committee made changes to the 2023 long-term incentive awards to further align executive performance with shareholder interests. These changes included a return to a three-year performance period, shifting a greater share of the LTIP mix to performance-based awards, and moving from performance cash incentives to PSUs.
Prior to 2021, the Company's LTIP program utilized a three-year performance period for the long-term performance cash incentive awards. For 2021 and 2022, the Committee elected to utilize a two-year performance period in recognition of the challenges associated with multi-year goal setting due to the uncertainty created by the pandemic. For the 2023 performance awards, the Committee reinstituted a three-year performance period, as impacts associated with the pandemic had lessened.
68 |
|
Executive Compensation
The table below outlines the long-term incentive awards grant value over the last three years to our CEO, Tony Sarsam, informed by the competitive market analysis conducted by our independent consultant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Year | Restricted Stock Awards | Performance Cash Incentives | PSUs | Total Long-Term Incentives |
|
2023 | $1,377,309 | $— | $2,796,295 | $4,173,604 | (1) |
2022 | 1,816,634 | 1,800,000 | — | 3,616,634 |
|
2021 | 1,687,591 | 1,600,000 | — | 3,287,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disclosure Implications for the Summary Compensation Table. As a result of these program design changes, SEC disclosure obligations require inclusion of the earned payout value of long-term cash incentive awards in the year in which they are earned and the grant date fair value of share-based awards (e.g., PSUs and restricted stock) in the year of grant regardless of whether the share-based awards will ultimately be earned. Additionally, as disclosed in our 2023 proxy statement for fiscal year 2022, as a result of the change in performance periods, two years of long-term performance cash grants were earned in fiscal year 2022, and there will be no performance cash incentives earned in fiscal year 2024.
For 2023, both the grant date fair value of PSUs granted in March 2023 ($2,796,295) and the earned payout value of the 2022 performance cash awards granted in March 2022 ($1,800,000 at target, paying out at 200%) are reported in the same 2023 compensation row.
An illustration of the timing of Mr. Sarsam’s long-term incentive grants is shown below for additional clarity. Note that this will no longer be a disclosure issue in 2024 and future years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Compensation Year for Summary Compensation Table | |||||||
Tony Sarsam |
| Payout Earned | 2021(1) |
| 2022 |
| 2023 |
| 2024 |
|
2020 Performance Cash earned |
| 120% |
|
| $1,455,287 | (2) |
|
|
|
|
2021 Performance Cash earned |
| 200% |
|
| 3,200,000 | (3) |
|
|
|
|
2022 Performance Cash earned |
| 200% |
|
|
|
| 3,600,000 | (4) |
|
|
2021 Restricted stock granted |
|
| 1,687,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 Restricted stock granted |
|
|
|
| 1,816,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
2023 Restricted stock granted |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,377,309 |
|
|
|
2024 Restricted stock granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ TBD |
|
2023 PSUs granted |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,796,295 |
|
|
|
2024 PSUs granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ TBD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Share Unit Awards. When reviewing the 2023 LTIP, the Committee considered whether the performance metrics were aligned with the current state of the business, especially considering that the wholesale distribution and retail sectors have experienced significant disruption over the past few years. Evaluating the metrics, the Company determined to include a three-year cumulative Adjusted EPS metric and an average annual return on invested capital metric. These metrics were chosen because they align with the Company’s long-term strategic plan and incentivize both profitability and efficient utilization of invested capital.
69 |
|
Executive Compensation
Under the 2023 LTIP, each PSU award depends on company performance in these two metrics, and vest over the three-year performance period ending January 3, 2026. The shares earned, if any, will cliff vest as of the end of the performance period, based on continued employment through such date (with exception for death, disability, or retirement).
Under the 2023 LTIP, these metrics are defined as follows:
Performance Measurement | Percentage | ||
Cumulative Adjusted EPS | 70% | ||
Average Annual ROIC | 30% | ||
The number of units a participant can earn, as a percentage of the target number of units granted, is based on the threshold, target and maximum levels of performance established by the Committee. There is the potential for an upside opportunity if the target performance is exceeded, with a maximum payout equal to engage compensation consultants200% of the target opportunity. The performance goals were designed at the time to be challenging but achievable with the coordinated, cross-functional focus and effort of the executives. The amount of each component earned for the three-year performance period will be determined according to the following schedule (the percentage earned is interpolated for actual achievement between the threshold and maximum performance levels identified in analysiseach table):
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Measurement |
| ||
|
| Percentage of Adjusted EPS |
| Percent of Target |
|
Below Threshold |
| <90.0% |
| 0% |
|
Threshold |
| 90.0% |
| 25% |
|
Target |
| 100.0% |
| 100% |
|
Maximum |
| ≥110% |
| 200% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below shows the March 2023 PSU grants at target amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
| Units (#) |
| Target Grant Value ($) |
|
Mr. Sarsam |
| 102,654 |
| $2,796,295 |
|
Mr. Monaco |
| 25,225 |
| 687,129 |
|
Mr. Sisk |
| 6,727 |
| 183,243 |
|
Mr. Tayebi |
| 11,211 |
| 305,388 |
|
Mr. Morgan |
| 11,196(1) |
| 302,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
Executive Compensation
Restricted Stock Awards. In March 2023, grants of restricted stock were awarded to the named executive officers, which vest in equal annual installments over three years beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the NEO’s continued service (or upon termination due to death or disability). The table below represents the March 2023 grant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
| Shares of Restricted |
| Restricted Stock Grant Value ($) |
|
Mr. Sarsam |
| 50,562 |
| $1,377,309 |
|
Mr. Monaco |
| 16,818 |
| 458,122 |
|
Mr. Sisk |
| 4,485 |
| 122,171 |
|
Mr. Tayebi |
| 7,476 |
| 203,646 |
|
Mr. Morgan |
| 7,272(1) |
| 197,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRIOR LONG-TERM CASH AWARDS
Upon completion of the two-year performance period, the 2021 and 2022 performance cash awards include an additional 12 month vesting period before a payout will be made (i.e., three-year total vesting period) subject to the NEO's continued service or upon their eligible retirement, death or termination due to disability. Performance goals were designed at the time to be challenging but achievable with the coordinated, cross-functional focus and effort of the executives. Based on the success of our transformational initiatives and execution of other areaselements of executive compensation, suchthe strategy, the Company produced strong financial results and the performance goals were exceeded.
The following table shows the status of all outstanding performance incentive cash awards as stock ownership, change-in-control,of December 30, 2023:.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Award Date | Performance | Percentage of | Performance | Target | Actual Performance | Actual Performance | Payout | Payout |
|
March 1, 2022 | ROIC | 30% | FYE 12/30/23 | 5.35% | 6.21% | 116.2% | 200% | After fiscal 2024 |
|
| Adj. EBITDA | 70% | FYE 12/30/23 | $449,700 | $497,528 | 110.6% | 200%(3) |
|
|
March 2, 2021 | ROIC | 30% | FYE 12/31/22 | 5.09% | 6.53% | 128.2% | 200% | After fiscal 2023 |
|
| Adj. EBITDA | 70% | FYE 12/31/22 | $416,340 | $465,493 | 111.8% | 200%(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)Executive Compensation
Stock Ownership Guidelines
SpartanNash’sThe Board of Directors has established stock ownership guidelines for corporate officers. These guidelines are designed to help ensure that officers share downside risk and upside potential with other shareholders. Our executive officers are expected to achieve and maintain a level of stock ownership having a value that is approximately equal to or greater than a percentage of the executive’s annual base salary. Executive officers have restrictions on the amount they can sell if ownership requirements are not met. The percentages are as follows:
| ||||
Position | Percentage of | |||
Chief Executive Officer | 500% | |||
| 300% | |||
| 200% | |||
| 100% | |||
|
Until the specified level of ownership is achieved, executives are requiredin any calendar year an executive is permitted to hold at leastsell no more than 50% of allthe shares acquiredthat vest (net of taxes) throughunder the Company’s stock incentive plans and other forms of stock based compensation.in that calendar year. As of January 2, 2016,December 30, 2023, all of the Company’s named executive officers had achieved the target ownership level or were making satisfactory progress toward the target levels and in compliance with the Company’s stock ownership policy.policy and none have sold stock in 2023.
Clawback Policy
The Company maintains a clawback policy providing that under certain circumstances, the Company may recover incentive compensation paid to any current or former Associate holding a position of Vice President or a more senior position. The compensation is recoverable if: (a) there is a restatement of all or a portion of the Company’s financial statements due to material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements, (b) the incentive compensation was based on materially inaccurate financial statements or performance metrics, or (c) the Associate engaged in ethical misconduct, serious wrongdoing, or violation of applicable legal or regulatory requirements that causes substantial harm to the company. The Company may recover any incentive compensation paid within the three years prior to the applicable event or conduct. During 2023, the Company modified its clawback policy to comply with SEC and Nasdaq listing rules.
Insider Trading Policy
The Company has adopted an insider trading policy governing the purchase and sale of our securities by our directors, officers and Associates to promote compliance with federal securities laws and to preserve the integrity and reputation of the Company and that of all persons associated with the Company. A copy of our insider trading policy is filed as Exhibit 19 to our annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 30, 2023.
Personal Benefits and Perquisites
Perquisites play a minor role in the Company’s executive compensation program.programs. The Company has retained a firm to provide tax and financial planning services for its named executive officers. SpartanNash does not provide itsofficers, and executives are provided with perquisitesan annual physical examination. Mr. Sisk was provided with a travel allowance for commuting to and from the corporate office, in lieu of the Company’s customary relocation benefit offered to executives. Occasionally, an executive’s spouse or other guests may accompany the executive on corporate aircraft when the aircraft is already scheduled for business purposes, including Company events where spouses or other guests are invited, and the aircraft can accommodate additional passengers. In those cases, there is no additional aggregate incremental cost to the Company and, as a result, no amount is reflected in the “2023 Summary Compensation Table” for such as club memberships, automobiles, or personal travel unrelated to our business.travel.
72 |
|
Executive Compensation
Risk Considerations
The Compensation Committee does not believe our executive compensation programprograms encourages excessive or inappropriate risk taking for the following reasons:
•
•
•
we have strict internal controls;
the Company may recover incentive-based compensation under the Company’s clawback policy; and
•
Severance and Change in Control Payments
SpartanNash believes that severance payments upon certain terminations of employment benefit the Company and the shareholders by allowing executives to remain focused during uncertain times while also obtaining restrictive covenants for the benefit of the Company. SpartanNash also believes
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
that benefits payable upon a “double-trigger” of both terminationa Qualifying Termination of employment and a change in control benefit the Company and the shareholders by motivating and encouraging each executive to be receptive to potential strategic transactions that are in the best interest of shareholders, even if the executive faces potential job loss, and by motivating the executives in the period leading up to a potential change in control. To accomplish these goals, SpartanNash has entered into an employment agreement and anwith executive severance agreement withofficers, including each named executive officer. In addition, all equity awards are issued with a “double trigger” vesting provision.
The severance benefits set forth in our employment agreements include that, upon the occurrence of a Qualifying Termination before or after a Change in Control Protection Period, the relevant executive officer which are discussedwill be entitled to receive (i) a lump sum payment equal to a multiple of his or her base salary and target AIP for the year of termination (two times in more detail elsewherethe case of Mr. Sarsam and one and one half times in this proxy statement.the case of the other NEOs), (ii) a pro-rata annual portion of the executive officer’s AIP for the year of termination based upon achievement of applicable performance goals, (iii) reimbursement of any COBRA premiums (less the amount paid by the executive officer during employment) for the same coverage period equal to the executive officer’s severance multiple and (iv) any accrued compensation or benefits.
In the event of a Qualifying Termination during a Change in Control Protection Period, (i) the lump sum base salary and target bonus payment will be equal to an increased multiple (two and one half times in the case of Mr. Sarsam and two times in the case of the other NEOs), (ii) the COBRA reimbursement period will increase by the same coverage period as such executive officer’s severance multiple and (iii) the executive officer will be entitled to receive continued life insurance coverage for the shorter of twenty-four months post-termination or until the executive officer receives a substantially equal benefit from a new employer, plus the other payments and benefits identified in sections (ii) and (iv) in the immediately preceding paragraph.
Under the terms of our equity basedequity-based compensation plans and our executive employment and severance agreements, the Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers are entitled to payments and benefits upon the occurrence of specified events including termination of employment and upon a change in control of the Company. The specific terms of these arrangements and an estimate of the compensation that would have been payable had they been triggered as of fiscal year-end are described in detail in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.” The terms and conditions of these arrangements are the result of arms-length negotiations between the Compensation CommitteeCompany and the Company’s executive officers.officers and reflect input from the Committee’s independent compensation consultant and a review of market data.
The termination of employment provisions of the executive employment and severance agreementsagreement are intended, in part, to address retention concerns by providing these individuals with a certain amount of compensation that would offset the potential disincentive to support an effort that would result in a change in control of the Company that could threaten the executive’s own jobs. From timejob.
73 |
|
Executive Compensation
Separation of Mr. Sisk
On December 30, 2023, the Company and Mr. David Sisk, the Company's Executive Vice President and Chief Customer Officer, entered into a separation agreement to time,terminate employment without cause. Pursuant to the separation agreement, Mr. Sisk served through December 30 and received the following severance benefits which were consistent with the benefits payable under his employment agreement for a termination without cause: (i) a $984,000 lump sum payment; (ii) a 2023 AIP payout determined based on actual performance ($194,300); and (iii) reimbursement for retiree medical coverage in lieu of COBRA health benefits ($20,286). Mr. Sisk's severance also included tax and financial planning services ($28,000) and payment for up to $10,000 in household moving expenses. In 2024, he will receive $375,000 in compensation for consulting and transition services related to the military customer channel. Mr. Sisk's agreement also contains customary provisions associated with an executive’s separation, including an 18 month restrictive covenant, waiver and release of claims against the Company, confidentiality and cooperation obligations.
74 |
|
Executive Compensation
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the information provided under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee reviewsrecommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and reassesses the termination and changeAnalysis be included in control arrangements with the named executive officers to determine whether the arrangements effectively serve their intended purposes and are consistent with prevailing practicesSpartanNash’s annual report on Form 10-K for the marketsyear ended December 30, 2023 and this proxy statement.
Respectfully submitted,
Pamela S. Puryear, Ph.D., Chair
M. Shân Atkins
Julien R. Mininberg
Fred Bentley, Jr.
William R. Voss
The information contained in whichthe “Compensation Committee Report” is not considered to be “soliciting material,” “filed” or incorporated by reference in any past or future filing by the Company competes for executive talent. The Committee typically engages a compensation consultantunder the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of 1933 unless and only to assist the determination of prevailing market practices.
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code includes potential limitations on the deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to certain officers. While we do not design our compensation programs solely for tax purposes, we do design our programs to be tax efficient forextent that the Company where possible. Under appropriate circumstances, SpartanNash may approve compensation that is not deductible under Section 162(m) ifspecifically incorporates it determines that it would be in the best interests of SpartanNash and its shareholders for such compensation to be paid.by reference.
Shareholder Say-On-Pay Votes
The Company provides its shareholders with the opportunity to cast a say-on-pay vote annually, which is an advisory vote on executive compensation. At the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders held in June 2015, a substantial majority (over 93%) of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal at that meeting were voted in favor of the proposal. The Compensation Committee believes this affirms shareholders’ support of the Company’s approach to executive compensation, and did not change its approach in fiscal 2015. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of the Company’s say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers.
75 |
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)Executive Compensation
2023 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table shows certain information concerning the compensation earned by each person who served in the capacity of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, and each of the Company’s three most highly compensated executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer who were serving as executive officers as of the end of fiscal 20152023 (the officers identified in the table below are referenced in this Proxy Statement as the “named executive officers”). For the purpose of the following table,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal | Year |
| Salary(1) |
| Bonus |
| Stock |
| Non-Equity |
| All Other |
| Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tony Sarsam | 2023 |
| $980,769 |
| $— |
| $4,173,604 |
| $4,619,543 |
| $203,574 |
| $9,977,490 |
|
President and CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 |
| 900,000 |
| — |
| 1,816,634 |
| 6,905,287 |
| 122,061 |
| 9,743,982 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 |
| 859,615 |
| — |
| 1,687,591 |
| 1,788,924 |
| 334,342 |
| 4,670,472 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jason Monaco | 2023 |
| 583,654 |
| — |
| 1,145,251 |
| 1,189,342 |
| 75,325 |
| 2,993,572 |
|
EVP and CFO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 |
| 511,250 |
| — |
| 416,372 |
| 1,415,625 |
| 65,430 |
| 2,408,677 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 |
| 384,615 |
| 55,000 |
| 778,095 |
| 489,991 |
| 312,364 |
| 2,020,065 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Sisk | 2023 |
| 408,077 |
| — |
| 305,414 |
| 194,300 |
| 1,199,902 |
| 2,107,693 |
|
EVP and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Customer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Masiar Tayebi | 2023 |
| 450,769 |
| — |
| 509,034 |
| 624,943 |
| 57,989 |
| 1,642,735 |
|
EVP and Chief Strategy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Information Officer | 2022 |
| 409,000 |
| — |
| 201,924 |
| 833,384 |
| 46,622 |
| 1,490,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bennett Morgan | 2023 |
| 441,923 |
| — |
| 499,899 |
| 558,350 |
| 60,903 |
| 1,561,075 |
|
EVP and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Merchandising | 2022 |
| 390,923 |
| 200,000 |
| 186,758 |
| 399,231 |
| 405,330 |
| 1,582,242 |
|
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position | Fiscal Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards(1) ($) | Option Awards ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2) ($) | Change in Pension Value and Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(3) ($) | All other Compensation(4) ($) | Total(5) ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dennis Eidson | 2015 | 896,154 | — | 1,184,449 | — | 1,658,881 | 4,768 | 149,061 | 3,893,313 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
President and | 2014 | 891,202 | — | 1,000,427 | — | 1,216,601 | 26,267 | 141,320 | 3,275,817 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CEO | 2013T | 603,510 | — | 1,448,405 | — | 1,169,143 | 2,300 | 95,188 | 3,318,546 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 765,962 | — | 808,876 | — | 777,335 | 3,929 | 99,341 | 2,455,443 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David Staples | 2015 | 584,615 | — | 384,975 | — | 668,037 | 5,126 | 65,505 | 1,708,258 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
EVP and COO | 2014 | 509,138 | — | 275,090 | — | 442,400 | 4,338 | 61,162 | 1,292,128 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Interim CFO) | 2013T | 330,661 | — | 244,433 | — | 380,185 | 2,905 | 44,312 | 1,002,496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 429,871 | — | 230,558 | — | 247,667 | 4,961 | 42,108 | 955,165 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derek Jones | 2015 | 419,231 | — | 665,821 | — | 413,185 | 920 | 43,814 | 1,542,971 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
EVP and President | 2014 | 366,655 | — | 175,066 | — | 220,275 | 779 | 37,931 | 800,706 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wholesale and Dist. | 2013T | 243,779 | 163,353 | — | 237,871 | 521 | 27,379 | 672,903 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ops | 2013 | 317,030 | — | 154,133 | — | 156,961 | 891 | 29,225 | 658,240 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodore Adornato | 2015 | 369,308 | — | 186,593 | — | 322,899 | 2,058 | 39,236 | 920,094 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
EVP Retail Operations | 2014 | 366,731 | — | 175,066 | — | 249,678 | 1,742 | 41,612 | 834,829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013T | 249,481 | — | 287,231 | — | 242,278 | 1,166 | 29,370 | 809,526 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 324,553 | — | 154,133 | — | 159,290 | 1,991 | 31,331 | 671,298 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kathleen M. Mahoney(6) | 2015 | 376,923 | 552,500 | 186,593 | — | 210,937 | — | 14,494 | 1,341,447 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
EVP Chief Legal Officer |
76 |
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 2022 LTI Grant |
|
| ||
Name | Annual | ROIC | Adj. EBITDA | Total 2022 | Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Sarsam | $1,019,543 | $1,080,000 | $2,520,000 | $3,600,000 | $4,619,543 |
|
Mr. Monaco | 364,342 | 247,500 | 577,500 | 825,000 | 1,189,342 |
|
Mr. Sisk | 194,300 | — | — | — | 194,300 |
|
Mr. Tayebi | 224,943 | 120,000 | 280,000 | 400,000 | 624,943 |
|
Mr. Morgan | 195,465 | 108,865 | 254,019 | 362,885 | 558,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name | Qualified | Nonqualified | Financial | Vacation | Travel(b) | Travel | Other Perquisites | Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mr. Sarsam | $3,346 | $180,024 | $19,100 | $— | $— | $— | $1,104 | $203,574 |
|
Mr. Monaco | 8,647 | 45,391 | 20,293 | — | — | — | 994 | 75,325 |
|
Mr. Sisk | 11,799 | — | 20,395 | 1,081,709 | 65,034 | 20,286 | 679 | 1,199,902 |
|
Mr. Tayebi | 11,462 | 25,185 | 20,580 | — | — | — | 762 | 57,989 |
|
Mr. Morgan | 11,774 | 21,872 | 20,114 | — | — | — | 7,143 | 60,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
77
|
|
Name | Annual Cash ($) | Adj. EPS Portion ($) | Net Sales Portion ($) | Merger Synergies ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||
Mr. Eidson | 945,850 | 200,954 | 81,308 | 430,769 | 1,658,881 | |||||||||||||||
Mr. Staples | 456,768 | 59,542 | 24,091 | 127,636 | 668,037 | |||||||||||||||
Mr. Jones | 271,929 | 39,810 | 16,108 | 85,338 | 413,185 | |||||||||||||||
Mr. Adornato | 181,643 | 39,810 | 16,108 | 85,338 | 322,899 | |||||||||||||||
Ms. Mahoney | 210,937 | — | — | — | 210,937 |
|
|
Name | Qualified Savings Plan Match and Profit Sharing Contribution ($) | Nonqualified Savings Plan Match and Profit Sharing Contribution ($) | Dividends on Unvested Restricted Stock ($) | Insurance Premiums ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||
Mr. Eidson | 7,960 | 74,332 | 66,259 | 510 | 149,061 | |||||||||||||||
Mr. Staples | 8,008 | 37,123 | 19,864 | 510 | 65,505 | |||||||||||||||
Mr. Jones | 6,898 | 14,978 | 21,428 | 510 | 43,814 | |||||||||||||||
Mr. Adornato | 7,958 | 19,087 | 11,681 | 510 | 39,236 | |||||||||||||||
Ms. Mahoney | 7,056 | — | 6,928 | 510 | 14,494 |
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)Executive Compensation
2023 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
The following table provides information concerning each grant of an award made to the named executive officers in fiscal 2015.2023.
Grant Date | Estimated Possible or Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ($)(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dennis Eidson | 2/25/15 | 99,000 | 990,000 | 1,980,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/15 | 408,000 | 1,200,000 | 2,400,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/15 | 44,612 | 1,184,449 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
David Staples | 2/25/15 | 48,000 | 480,000 | 960,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/15 | 132,600 | 390,000 | 780,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/15 | 14,500 | 384,975 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Derek Jones | 2/25/15 | 30,100 | 301,000 | 602,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/15 | 76,330 | 224,500 | 449,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/15 | 25,078 | 665,821 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodore Adornato | 2/25/15 | 20,405 | 204,050 | 408,100 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/15 | 64,260 | 189,000 | 378,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/15 | 7,028 | 186,593 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Kathleen Mahoney | 2/25/15 | 22,825 | 228,250 | 456,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/15 | 64,260 | 189,000 | 378,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2/25/15 | 7,028 | 186,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| Estimated Possible or Future | Estimated Possible or Future | All Other | Grant Date |
| ||||
Name | Award Type(1) | Grant Date | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Shares of | of Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tony | AIP | 3/1/23 | $307,091 | $1,228,365 | $2,456,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sarsam | RSA | 3/1/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 50,562 | $1,377,309 |
|
PSU | 3/1/23 |
|
|
| 25,664 | 102,654 | 205,308 |
| 2,796,295 |
| |
Jason | AIP | 3/1/23 | 109,742 | 438,966 | 877,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monaco | RSA | 3/1/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 16,818 | 458,122 |
|
| PSU | 3/1/23 |
|
|
| 6,306 | 25,225 | 50,450 |
| 687,129 |
|
David | AIP | 3/1/23 | 58,524 | 234,096 | 468,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sisk | RSA | 3/1/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 4,485 | 122,171 |
|
PSU | 3/1/23 |
|
|
| 1,682 | 6,727 | 13,454 |
| 183,243 |
| |
Masiar | AIP | 3/1/23 | 67,754 | 271,015 | 542,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tayebi | RSA | 3/1/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 7,476 | 203,646 |
|
| PSU | 3/1/23 |
|
|
| 2,803 | 11,211 | 22,422 |
| 305,388 |
|
Bennett | AIP | 3/1/23 | 58,875 | 235,500 | 471,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan | RSA | 3/1/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 7,176 | 195,474 |
|
| RSA | 9/15/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 96 | 2,040 |
|
PSU | 3/1/23 |
|
|
| 2,691 | 10,763 | 21,526 |
| 293,184 |
| |
PSU | 9/15/23 |
|
|
| 108 | 433 | 866 |
| 9,201 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) “AIP” denotes an annual cash incentive award (2) The amounts reported in these columns represent the possible threshold, target, and maximum awards that could have been earned by each named executive officer for the annual cash incentive award (AIP) under the 2015 Executive Cash Incentive Plan. |
|
Discussion of Summary Compensation and Plan-Based Awards Tables
The Company paid the compensation set forth in the Summary Compensation Table and the grants of Plan Based Awards table pursuant to the philosophy, procedures, and practices set forth above in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement. A summary of certain material
78 |
|
Executive Compensation
Salary;
Discussion of Summary Compensation and Plan-Based Awards Tables
Each namedcurrent executive officer is paid a salary pursuant tohas an employment agreement with the Company. For information regarding determination of base salaries, see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement.
The Company has entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with each of its executive officers. None of the agreements has a specified term of years. Under the terms of each Agreement, the Company will employ the executive as an officer of the Companyproviding for employment for an indefinite period of time until termination of employment. Each executive officer receives a base salary that will be reviewed
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
annually and is eligible to participate in any of the Company’s bonus programs designated by the Compensation Committee. Each executive officer’s employmentEmployment terminates automatically in the event of death, and the Company may terminate the executive’s employment for cause or for disability if he or she is no longer able to perform the essential functions of the position, or for cause. Please see the Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control section of this proxy statement for detailed information regarding payments to executive officers upon termination of employment for any reason.position.
2. Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards. As discussed in detail beginning on page 36, for fiscal 2015,
For 2023, each named executive officer was granted the opportunity to earn cash incentive compensation on an annual basis, and a long-term incentive award covering three fiscal years. The awards were granted under the Company’s shareholder-approved Executive Cash Incentive Plan of 2015.basis.
The Executive Plan is a non-equity incentive compensation plan that is designed to motivate executive officers and other participants who are in a positionpositioned to make substantial contributions toward the achievement of goals established under the plan. The plan’s objectives include:
•
•
•
The Executive Plan permits incentive compensation paid under the plan to be deductible under the Internal Revenue Code. Under the terms of the Executive Plan, the Compensation Committee may use only objective measures of financial performance specified in the Plan itself (or approved by the Company’s shareholders at a later date), and it must specify the relationship between the level of the cash incentive award and the performance measure. Payment of cash incentive awards under the Executive Plan is entirely contingent on the achievement of specified objective measures of performance.3. Equity Awards
Restricted Stock. All shares of restricted stock and PSUs were awarded to the named executive officersNEOs pursuant to the 2020 Stock Incentive Plan of 2005.Plan. Awards under SpartanNash’s equity compensation plans are designed to:
•
•
•
Prior to making any equity awards, the Compensation Committee considers share usage under all of the Company’s equity compensation plans, dilution of shareholders, and each executive’s current ownership of the Company’s stock.
Equity incentive awards have several key advantages over cash compensation, including promoting executive retention through the use of vesting periods and aligning executive and shareholder interests by giving executives an ownership stake in the Company.
The shares of restricted stock granted to the named executive officers in February 20152023 vest in fourthree equal yearly increments, based on March 1, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019.continued employment through the vest date. If the employment of an executive
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
officer is terminated for any reason other than death, disability, or retirement, then all unvested shares of restricted stock are forfeited unless the Compensation Committee exercises its discretion to waive any remaining restrictions. If an executive officer dies or becomes disabled, then all outstanding shares of restricted stock will vest automatically. In the event of retirement, the outstanding shares will continue to vest, provided that the executive continues to comply with the noncompetition covenants applicable to the award. If a change in control (as defined in the Incentive Plan) occurs, then all unvested shares of restricted stock will automatically vest. For information regarding accelerated vesting of restricted stock upon termination or a change-in-control of the Company, please see the section entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.”
Dividends. Executives receive any dividends paidPerformance share unit awards are contingent on vestedcompany performance relating to cumulative Adjusted EPS and unvested restricted shares ataverage annual return on invested capital metrics over a three-year performance period. There is the rate dividends are paid on common stock.
Holding Period.potential for an upside opportunity if the target performance is exceeded, with a maximum payout equal to 200% of the target award. The shares earned, if any, will cliff vest as of restricted stock awarded tothe end of the performance period, based on continued employment through such date. If the employment of an executive officer is terminated for any reason other than death, disability, or retirement before the end of the performance period, then any unearned portion of the PSU award will be forfeited. In the event of retirement, the named executive officers are subject to forfeiture if not held until the restrictions applicable to the shares have elapsed. While the shares of restricted stock once vested are not subject to an express holding period, each named executive officer must comply with the stock ownership guidelines discussed on page 43. Until the specified level of ownership is achieved, executives are required to hold at least 50% of all restricted stock granted to them.
Stock Bonus Plan. SpartanNash’s named executive officers and certain other key associates may elect to receive all orwill earn a portion of any annual cash incentive award they may receive in the form of SpartanNash common stock pursuant to the Company’s 2001 Stock Bonus Plan. Under the Plan, participants may elect to receive up to 100% of their annual cash incentive award in the form of SpartanNash stock. Associates who make such an election receive SpartanNash common stock having a value equal to thepro-rata portion of the annual cash incentive award designated bybased on the associate, plus an additional grantnumber of shares havingweeks of employment during the performance period. For information regarding accelerated vesting of PSUs upon termination or a value of up to 30%change-in-control of the portion of the participant’s annual cash incentive award that he or she elected to receive in stock. All shares issued under the Stock Bonus Plan are subject to a holding period of at least twelve months. The Compensation Committee has determined that for incentive award opportunities granted in 2016, participants will receive additional shares having a value of 20% of the elected cash bonus amount, and the minimum holding period will be 24 months.
Pension Benefits and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation. For information on pension benefits and non-qualified deferred compensation,Company, please see the tables and accompanying narrative below.section entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.”
All Other Compensation. The amounts reported4. Dividends
For awards made under “All Other Compensation” includethe 2020 Stock Incentive Plan, cash dividends will not be paid on unvested restricted stockequity awards, (which are paidbut participants earn dividend equivalents that vest at the same ratetime as dividends paid on the Company’s common stock), matching payments for contributionsunderlying shares and to the Company’s qualified and non-qualified retirement plans.extent that units are earned.
“All Other Compensation” also includes the dollar value of premiums paid by the Company for group term life insurance for the named executive officers. The Company pays group term life insurance premiums for all of its associates.
79 |
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)Executive Compensation
2023 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
The following table provides information concerning unexercised options and restricted stock awards that have not vested for each named executive officer outstanding as of December 30, 2023.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| Restricted Stock |
| Performance Share Unit Awards |
| ||||
Name |
| Number of |
| Market Value of |
| Number of Unearned Shares, Units or other Rights That Have Not Vested(3) |
| Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or other Rights That Have Not Vested(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tony B. Sarsam |
| 127,691 |
| $2,930,508 |
| 102,654 |
| $2,355,909 |
|
Jason Monaco |
| 43,624 |
| 1,001,171 |
| 25,225 |
| 578,914 |
|
David Sisk(4) |
| 10,642 |
| 244,234 |
| 6,727 |
| 154,385 |
|
Masiar Tayebi |
| 15,725 |
| 360,889 |
| 11,211 |
| 257,292 |
|
Bennett Morgan |
| 11,656 |
| 267,505 |
| 11,196 |
| 256,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting Schedule for Shares of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting Date |
| Tony B. |
| Jason |
| David |
| Masiar |
| Bennett |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/1/24 |
| 72,661 |
| 15,025 |
| — |
| 7,055 |
| 4,616 |
|
3/22/24 |
| — |
| 6,250 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
5/25/24 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1,316 |
| — |
|
3/1/25 |
| 38,176 |
| 10,493 |
| — |
| 4,862 |
| 4,616 |
|
3/22/25 |
| — |
| 6,250 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
3/1/26 |
| 16,854 |
| 5,606 |
| — |
| 2,492 |
| 2,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name | Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable(1) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable(3) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(3) (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(2) | |||||||||||||||||||
Dennis Eidson | 37,400 | — | 13.87 | 5/15/19 | 112,137 | 2,426,645 | ||||||||||||||||||
11,200 | — | 23.04 | 10/15/18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
34,300 | — | 22.69 | 5/16/18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1,020 | — | 22.50 | 10/17/17 | |||||||||||||||||||||
10,600 | — | 28.28 | 5/18/17 | |||||||||||||||||||||
David Staples | 13,800 | — | 13.87 | 5/15/19 | 33,673 | 728,684 | ||||||||||||||||||
21,000 | — | 22.69 | 5/16/18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,500 | — | 28.28 | 5/18/17 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Derek Jones | — | — | — | — | 37,602 | 813,707 | ||||||||||||||||||
Theodore Adornato | 13,300 | — | 22.69 | 5/16/18 | 19,552 | 423,105 | ||||||||||||||||||
4,900 | — | 28.28 | 5/18/17 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Kathleen Mahoney | — | — | — | — | 12,830 | 277,641 |
80 |
|
|
|
|
VESTING SCHEDULE FOR SHARES OF RESTRICTED STOCK
(#)
Vesting Date | Dennis Eidson | David Staples | Derek Jones | Theodore Adornato | Kathleen Mahoney | |||||||||||||||
2/1/16 | 11,052 | 3,039 | 1,934 | 1,934 | 1,934 | |||||||||||||||
3/1/16 | 11,153 | 3,625 | 2,087 | 1,757 | 1,757 | |||||||||||||||
5/1/16 | 11,367 | 3,240 | 2,166 | 2,166 | — | |||||||||||||||
5/1/16 | 11,501 | 3,408 | 2,278 | 2,278 | — | |||||||||||||||
2/1/17 | 11,052 | 3,039 | 1,934 | 1,934 | 1,934 | |||||||||||||||
3/1/17 | 11,153 | 3,625 | 2,087 | 1,757 | 1,757 | |||||||||||||||
5/1/17 | 11,501 | 3,408 | 2,278 | 2,278 | — | |||||||||||||||
2/1/18 | 11,052 | 3,039 | 1,934 | 1,934 | 1,934 | |||||||||||||||
3/1/18 | 11,153 | 3,625 | 2,087 | 1,757 | 1,757 | |||||||||||||||
3/1/19 | 11,153 | 3,625 | 2,087 | 1,757 | 1,757 | |||||||||||||||
3/1/20 | — | — | 16,730 | — | — |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)Executive Compensation
2023 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
The following table provides information concerning each exercise of stock options and each vesting of restricted stock during the last completed fiscal year for each of the named executive officers on an aggregated basis.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) | ||||||||||||
Dennis Eidson | 12,000 | 183,240 | 53,311 | 1,587,122 | ||||||||||||
David Staples | 9,000 | 137,430 | 15,490 | 462,024 | ||||||||||||
Derek Jones | 27,000 | 219,785 | 10,252 | 306,181 | ||||||||||||
Theodore Adornato | 16,800 | 235,600 | 10,252 | 306,181 | ||||||||||||
Kathleen Mahoney | — | — | 1,934 | 49,820 |
|
|
Messrs. Eidson, Staples, Jones, and Adornato participate in the Spartan Stores Cash Balance Pension Plan, a qualified pension plan. The Cash Balance Pension Plan was frozen in 2011 and additional service credits are no longer added to each Associate’s account. The participants in the Cash Balance Pension Plan will continue to accrue interest credits at the end of each month until the cash balance is paid out. The interest rate used for this purpose is the average of the 10-year Treasury interest rate over the 12 months ending in November of the prior calendar year, or 2.05%, whichever is greater.
Upon termination of employment, a participant will be entitled to his or her vested accrued benefit.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
The table below summarizes the pension benefits for the named executive officers that participateofficers.
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Stock Awards |
| ||
Name |
| Number of Shares |
| Value Realized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tony B. Sarsam |
| 55,807 |
| $1,520,183 |
|
Jason Monaco |
| 15,669 |
| 408,324 |
|
David Sisk |
| 4,380 |
| 119,311 |
|
Masiar Tayebi |
| 5,879 |
| 155,222 |
|
Bennett Morgan |
| 2,192 |
| 59,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUALIFIED DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT PLAN
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified Defined Contribution Retirement Plan
The Company maintains the Savings Plus Plan, a qualified 401(k) defined contribution retirement plan that is generally open to all of the Company’s non-union associates.Associates. Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in the Savings Plus Plan, subject to wage and contribution limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code.
The Savings Plus Plan allows for 50%100% matching contributions by the Company up to 6%on the first 3% of salary. Matchingsalary and 50% matching contributions are subject to a vesting schedule for associates with less than five yearson the next 2% of service. The Savings Plus Plan also includes a discretionary profit-sharing contribution for eligible participants. The profit-sharing contribution is targeted at 1.5% of eligible compensation annually, subject to fiscal year end results. The contribution for fiscal 2014 was 1.6%, which was contributed to participants’ accounts in March 2015.salary.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
SpartanNash maintains two nonqualifieda non-qualified deferred compensation plans: the SERP, which provides nonqualified deferred compensation benefits to SpartanNash’s officers, andplan, the Supplemental Executive Savings Plan (“SESP”), which is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for SpartanNash’s officers and director-level associates.certain other Associates.
The purpose of the SERP is to provide officers with the benefits that they are otherwise denied under the Cash Balance Pension Plan due to the annual dollar limit on compensation and other limitations of the Internal Revenue Code, which are referred to collectively as the “statutory limits.” Accordingly, each officer’s benefit under the SERP is equal to the officer’s benefit that would have accrued under the Pension Plan but for the operation of the statutory limits, minus the accrued benefit actually payable to the officer under the Pension Plan calculated in accordance with the statutory limits. The suspension of basic credits under the Cash Balance Pension Plan (as described above) has a corresponding impact on the SERP (i.e., SERP participants will no longer accrue basic credits under the SERP, but may accrue interest credits).
Benefits under the SERP are paid from SpartanNash’s general assets. There is no separate trust that has been established to fund benefits.
The purpose of the SESP is to provide officers with the benefits that they are otherwise denied under the Company’s qualified savings plan, the Savings Plus Plan, due to statutorythe annual dollar limit on compensation and other limitations of the Internal Revenue Code, which are referred to collectively as the “statutory limits.” Participants in the SESP may defer up to 50% of base salary and up to 100% of any bonuses under the plan. This opportunity is in addition to a participant’s savings opportunity under the Savings Plus Plan (subject to the statutory limits). Participants in the SESP are entitled to a Company-matching contribution that mirrors the 50% matching contributionformula provided by the Company up to 6% of salary under the Savings Plus Plan, except the statutory limits do not apply. SESP participants are entitled to a profit sharing contribution that mirrors the Company’s discretionary profit-sharing contribution in the Savings Plus Plan, as described above under caption “Qualified defined contribution retirement plan,” but only to the extent that statutory limits prevent such participants from receiving the match under the Savings Plus Plan.
The SESP provides participants with various investment alternatives, consisting primarily of mutual funds. The investments are only hypothetical investments, also referred to as phantom investments. The investment results for a participant are determined as if the contributions had actually been invested in the selected investment fund during the relevant time period.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
The following table provides certain information regarding participation of the named executive officers in our non-qualified deferred compensation plans.
81 |
|
Executive Compensation
2023 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
| Executive | Registrant | Aggregate | Aggregate | Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tony B. Sarsam |
| $196,154 | $166,252 | $17,528 | $— | $486,940 |
|
Jason Monaco |
| 52,529 | 41,919 | 15,534 | — | 160,879 |
|
David Sisk |
| 21,069 | — | 7,806 | — | 66,205 |
|
Masiar Tayebi |
| 22,539 | 23,258 | 6,464 | — | 71,641 |
|
Bennett Morgan |
| 22,096 | 20,199 | 2,885 | — | 45,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name | Executive Contributions In Last FY(1) ($) | Registrant ($) | Aggregate ($) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate ($) | |||||||||||||||
Dennis Eidson | 83,126 | 74,332 | 8,180 | — | 1,061,012 | |||||||||||||||
David Staples | 73,850 | 37,123 | (6,756 | ) | — | 768,209 | ||||||||||||||
Derek Jones | 34,108 | 14,978 | 2,167 | — | 198,647 | |||||||||||||||
Theodore Adornato | 20,638 | 19,087 | 1,257 | — | 372,537 | |||||||||||||||
Kathleen Mahoney | — | — | — | — | — |
|
|
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE-IN-CONTROL
All Named Executive Officers
The following discussion applies to the Company’s named executive officers. SpartanNash has entered into an employment agreement and severance agreement with each of its named executive officers. The employment agreements and severance agreements are summarized below.
Executive Employment AgreementsAgreement
Each of SpartanNash’s executive officers has an employment agreement with SpartanNash providing that if the officer’s employment is terminated by SpartanNash other than due to death, disability or cause (as defined in the employment agreement), or if the employment is terminated by the officer for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), the officer will receive the payments and benefits described and quantified in the table on page 56.below.
Each named executive officer’s employment agreement requires that the officerOfficers who are eligible for severance pay must meet certain conditions to be eligible for severance pay,receive the payments, including execution of a release of certain employment-related claims and compliance with the post-employment confidentiality and non-competition provisions of the employment agreement.
Executives will not receive severance payments or benefits under the Executive Employment Agreements if they receive any payments or benefits under the Executive Severance Agreements, which are described below.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
Executive Severance Agreements
Each of SpartanNash’s named executive officers has an executive severance agreement with SpartanNash. Under these agreements, if If the officer’s employment with SpartanNash terminates for reasons other than a nonqualifying termination (as described below) during the two-year period following a change in control (as described below) of SpartanNash, then the officer will receive the payments and benefits described and quantified in the table on page 58. For the Company’s namedbelow. The agreements with current executive officers other than Ms. Mahoney, the executive is required to accept up to a 10% reduction of severance benefits to avoid imposition of any excise tax imputed under the Internal Revenue Code. Ms. Mahoney’s agreement containsinclude a “best net” provision, providing that severance benefits will be reduced to avoid any excise taxes, or paid in full subject to Ms. Mahoneythe executive paying the applicable excise taxes, whichever results in the higher payment to the executive on an after-tax basis. In no event will the Company pay or reimburse any excise taxes relating to Ms. Mahoney’s agreement.
SpartanNash willWe do not provide benefits under the executive severance agreements in the event of a “nonqualifying termination.” A nonqualifying termination is defined in the agreements as any of the following: termination by SpartanNash for cause, termination by the officer (with notice to the Company)an excise tax gross-up for any reason other than for good reason (as definedchange in the executive severance agreement), retirement of the officer, and death or disability of the officer.control situation.
The term “change in control” is defined in the executive severance agreements generally as (1) the acquisition by any person or group of 20% or more of the outstanding common stock or voting power of SpartanNash, (2) the majority of the Board being comprised of persons other than the current members of the Board or their successors whose nominations were approved by at least two-thirds of the Board, or (3) the effective time of certain mergers, reorganizations, consolidations, plans of dissolution or sales of substantially all of SpartanNash’s assets.
The Company believes that the Executive Employment Agreements and Executive Severance Agreements help retain our executives and keep them focused on implementing our strategic plan during a time of increased competition, consolidation, and uncertainty in our industry. The agreements benefit the Company by enabling executives to remain focused on the business of the Company in uncertain times without the distraction of potential job loss.
The executive severance agreements are even more important in the context of a change in control as we believe they will motivate and encourage each executive to be receptive to potential strategic transactions that are in the best interest of shareholders, even if the executive faces potential job loss, which would otherwise result in losing the opportunity to vest in equity awards, which comprise a significant portion of each executive’s compensation. We believe this benefits the Company and the potential acquirer because it enables the Company to retain and motivate the executive during the time preceding a potential change in control.
82 |
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)Executive Compensation
The following table summarizes the potential payments and benefits payable to each named executive officer upon termination for the reasons set forth below, assumingbelow. None of the NEOs were eligible to receive retirement or early retirement benefits as of December 30, 2023, therefore we do not present any information about payments that would be made upon retirement. For executives other than Mr. Sisk, the disclosure assumes that the triggering event took place on January 2, 2016December 30, 2023 (and that no change in control took place before the triggering event):.
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION NOT IN CONNECTIONMr. Sisk's employment terminated on December 30, 2023. Pursuant to his separation agreement, Mr. Sisk served through December 30 and received a severance package consistent with the benefits payable under his employment agreement, including: (i) a $984,000 lump sum payment, (ii) a 2023 Annual Incentive Plan payout representing $194,300, and (iii) reimbursement for retiree health benefit coverage in lieu of COBRA health benefits of $20,286. Mr. Sisk's severance also included 18 months of tax and financial planning assistance (estimated value of $28,000) and payment for household moving expenses not to exceed $10,000. In 2024, he will receive a consulting bonus of $375,000 for consulting and transition assistance services.
WITH A CHANGE IN CONTROLPotential Payments Upon Termination Not in Connection With a Change in Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tony B. |
| Jason |
| Masiar |
| Bennett |
|
Termination Other than for Death, Disability or Cause(1)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum Payment(3) | $4,500,000 |
| $1,575,000 |
| $1,104,000 |
| $1,104,000 |
|
Pro-Rata Annual Cash Incentive Award(4) | 1,019,543 |
| 364,342 |
| 224,943 |
| 195,465 |
|
Health Coverage Reimbursement (COBRA)(5) | 55,300 |
| 41,099 |
| 38,849 |
| 39,309 |
|
Other Compensation(6) | 115,385 |
| 69,231 |
| 46,204 |
| 53,077 |
|
TOTAL | $5,690,228 |
| $2,049,672 |
| $1,413,996 |
| $1,391,851 |
|
Death or Disability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Vesting(7) | $2,930,508 |
| $1,001,171 |
| $360,889 |
| $267,505 |
|
Performance Share Units Vesting(9) | 780,301 |
| 191,742 |
| 85,218 |
| 85,104 |
|
Annual Cash Incentive Award(8) | 1,019,543 |
| 364,342 |
| 224,943 |
| 195,465 |
|
Long-Term Cash Incentive Award(10) | 6,800,000 |
| 1,473,317 |
| 742,307 |
| 362,885 |
|
TOTAL | $11,530,352 |
| $3,030,572 |
| $1,413,357 |
| $910,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis Eidson | David Staples | Derek Jones | Theodore Adornato | Kathleen Mahoney | ||||||||||||||||
Termination Other than for Retirement, Death, Disability or Cause(1)(2) |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Lump-Sum Salary Payment(3) | $ | 900,000 | $ | 600,000 | $ | 430,000 | $ | 371,000 | $ | 415,000 | ||||||||||
Health Coverage Reimbursement (COBRA)(4) | $ | 13,351 | $ | 19,048 | $ | 19,048 | $ | 6,239 | $ | 6,164 | ||||||||||
Outplacement Assistance | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10,000 | ||||||||||
TOTAL | $ | 923,351 | $ | 629,048 | $ | 459,048 | $ | 387,239 | $ | 431,164 | ||||||||||
Retirement(5)(6)(7) |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Vesting(8) | $ | 2,426,645 | $ | 728,684 | $ | 813,707 | $ | 423,105 | $ | 277,641 | ||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Award(9) | $ | 945,850 | $ | 456,768 | $ | 271,929 | $ | 181,643 | $ | 210,937 | ||||||||||
Long-Term Cash Incentive Award(10)(11) | $ | 1,984,470 | $ | 579,048 | $ | 372,870 | $ | 365,460 | $ | 172,031 | ||||||||||
TOTAL | $ | 5,356,965 | $ | 1,764,500 | $ | 1,458,506 | $ | 970,208 | $ | 660,609 | ||||||||||
Death or Disability | ||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Vesting(8) | $ | 2,426,645 | $ | 728,684 | $ | 813,707 | $ | 423,105 | $ | 277,641 | ||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Award(9) | $ | 945,850 | $ | 456,768 | $ | 271,929 | $ | 181,643 | $ | 210,937 | ||||||||||
Long-Term Cash Incentive Award(10)(11) | $ | 2,131,448 | $ | 626,816 | $ | 400,367 | $ | 388,609 | $ | 195,180 | ||||||||||
TOTAL | $ | 5,503,943 | $ | 1,812,268 | $ | 1,486,003 | $ | 993,357 | $ | 683,758 |
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)Executive Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
The following table summarizes the potential payments and benefits payable to each of SpartanNash’s named executive officers upon termination after a change ofin control of the Company, assuming that the change in control and termination took place on January 2, 2016.December 30, 2023.
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION IN CONNECTIONPotential Payments Upon Termination in Connection With a Change in Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tony B. |
| Jason |
| Masiar |
| Bennett |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum Payment(1) |
| $5,625,000 |
| $2,100,000 |
| $1,472,000 |
| $1,472,000 |
|
Pro-Rata Annual Cash Incentive Award(2) |
| 1,019,543 |
| 364,342 |
| 224,943 |
| 195,465 |
|
Long-Term Cash Incentive Award(3) |
| 6,800,000 |
| 1,473,317 |
| 742,307 |
| 362,885 |
|
Acceleration of Restricted Stock(4) |
| 2,930,508 |
| 1,001,171 |
| 360,889 |
| 267,505 |
|
Acceleration of Performance Share Units(5) |
| 780,301 |
| 191,742 |
| 85,218 |
| 85,104 |
|
Other Compensation(6) |
| 115,385 |
| 69,231 |
| 46,204 |
| 53,077 |
|
Continued Benefits(7) |
| 166,239 |
| 124,464 |
| 115,087 |
| 120,264 |
|
TOTAL |
| $17,436,976 |
| $5,324,267 |
| $3,046,648 |
| $2,556,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WITH A
84 |
|
Executive Compensation
CHANGE IN CONTROL TREATMENT
Under our AIP, upon a change in control before the end of the fiscal year, Associates will earn an incentive payout equal to the greater of the target award or the projected award, to be paid no later than the 15th day of the third month following the change in control. Assuming a change in control occurred as of December 30, 2023, our NEOs would be entitled to the following payments with respect to the 2023 AIP: Mr. Sarsam, $1,019,543; Mr. Monaco, $364,342; Mr. Sisk, $194,300; Mr. Tayebi, $224,943; and Mr. Morgan, $195,465.
Under our equity plans, if an award agreement is not assumed by the surviving entity or otherwise equitably converted or substituted in connection with the change in control in a manner approved by the Committee or Board, the equity awards will be treated as follows: (i) unvested shares of restricted stock will immediately become fully vested and delivered to the Associate, and (ii) unvested PSUs will vest on a pro-rata basis for the length of employment during the performance period prior to the change in control. If such change of control occurs during the first year of the performance period, then the pro-rata number of PSUs shall be deemed earned which corresponds to the target level of performance. If such change of control occurs prior to the final date of the performance period but after the first year of the performance period, then the pro-rata number of PSUs shall be deemed earned based on the greater of target performance or actual performance through the latest completed fiscal year of the performance period prior to the year in which such change of control occurred.
Assuming a change in control occurred as of December 30, 2023 in which the equity awards were not assumed by the surviving entity, our NEOs would vest in their outstanding equity awards with an estimated value as follows: Mr. Sarsam, $3,710,809; Mr. Monaco, $1,192,913; Mr. Sisk, $295,368; Mr. Tayebi, $446,107; and Mr. Morgan, $352,609.
Under the terms of the prior long-term cash incentive programs, upon a change in control of SpartanNash following the end of the applicable performance period, any earned long-term cash incentive program award will be based on actual performance through the end of the performance period and payable in full upon the earliest to occur of the termination of employment for any reason, or a date selected by SpartanNash that is no later than the 15th day of the third month following the change in control. Assuming a change in control occurred as of December 30, 2023, our NEOs would be entitled to the following payments with respect to the 2021 and 2022 long-term cash incentive program awards: Mr. Sarsam, $6,800,000; Mr. Monaco, $1,473,317; Mr. Sisk, $475,000; Mr. Tayebi, $742,307; and Mr. Morgan, $362,885.
Dennis Eidson | David Staples | Derek Jones | Theodore Adornato | Kathleen Mahoney | ||||||||||||||||
Lump Sum Payment(1) | $ | 3,780,000 | $ | 2,160,000 | $ | 1,462,000 | $ | 1,150,100 | $ | 1,286,500 | ||||||||||
Long-Term Cash Incentive Award(2) | $ | 2,310,149 | $ | 675,958 | $ | 431,640 | $ | 419,882 | $ | 226,452 | ||||||||||
Acceleration of Options(3) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Acceleration of Restricted Stock(3) | $ | 2,426,645 | $ | 728,684 | $ | 813,707 | $ | 423,105 | $ | 277,641 | ||||||||||
Cash Balance Pension Plan Benefit and SERP Benefit(4) | $ | 6,765 | $ | 8,543 | $ | 1,534 | $ | 3,430 | N/A | |||||||||||
Continued Benefits(5) | $ | 59,332 | $ | 84,652 | $ | 84,652 | $ | 28,539 | $ | 28,197 | ||||||||||
Outplacement Services(6) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | ||||||||||
Adjustment to Avoid Tax Gross-Up(7) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Excise Tax Gross-Up(7)(8) | — | — | — | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||
TOTAL | $ | 8,607,891 | $ | 3,682,837 | $ | 2,818,533 | $ | 2,050,056 | $ | 1,843,790 |
CEO PAY RATIO
Our Chief Executive Officer to median employee pay ratio is calculated in accordance with SEC rules. We identified our median employee, excluding the Chief Executive Officer, as of January 2, 2021, by using total cash compensation as our consistently applied cash compensation measure.
As allowed under Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we used the same median employee to determine our pay ratio disclosure for 2023 as in fiscal year 2021 as there were no significant changes to our median employee's status, our employee population or our employee compensation arrangements in fiscal year 2023 that we believe would reasonably be expected to result in a significant change to the pay ratio. The fiscal year 2023 annual total compensation of our median employee was calculated using the same methodology we use for our named executive officers as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.
Our Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation, as reported in the 2023 Summary Compensation Table, was $9,977,490. The annual total compensation of our median employee was $34,812. Therefore, our 2023 Chief Executive Officer to median employee pay ratio is 287:1. As discussed in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this proxy statement, as a result of compensation program design changes, the Summary Compensation Table amounts reported for Mr. Sarsam are higher in 2023. This is because both the grant date fair value of PSUs granted in March 2023 and the earned payout value of the 2022 performance cash awards granted in March 2022 are reported in the same 2023 compensation row. Additionally, as disclosed in our 2023 proxy statement for fiscal year 2022, as a result of the change in performance periods, two years of LTIP performance cash grants were earned in fiscal year 2022. These disclosure obligations give the appearance of substantially higher 2022 and 2023 grants.
85 |
|
|
Executive Compensation
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
The following disclosure sets forth the "compensation actually paid" to our NEOs in relation to certain performance measures of the Company in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The compensation actually paid (or "CAP") to our CEO (referred to below as the Principal Executive Officer or "PEO") and to our other NEOs ("Non-PEO NEOs") and certain company financial metrics are presented for the last four years, calculated in accordance with SEC requirements. CAP does not necessarily reflect compensation actually earned by or paid to our NEOs in each covered year or how the Compensation Committee evaluates compensation decisions. The company's pay-for-performance philosophy and how the company links compensation to company performance is discussed in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Summary Compensation Table Total |
| Compensation Actually Paid |
|
| Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On (4): |
|
| |||
Year | PEO1 | PEO2 |
| PEO1 | PEO2 | Average | Average | Total | Peer Group | Net | Company Selected Measure |
(1) | (2) | (2) |
| (3) | (3) | (2) | (3) |
| (5) |
| (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2023 | $9,977,490 | n/a |
| $8,788,599 | n/a | $2,076,269 | $1,790,152 | $189 | $164 | $52,237 | $257,401 |
2022 | 9,743,982 | n/a |
| 10,477,683 | n/a | 1,782,208 | 1,681,256 | 240 | 198 | 34,518 | 242,879 |
2021 | 4,670,472 | n/a |
| 5,444,034 | n/a | 1,611,915 | 1,668,379 | 199 | 216 | 73,751 | 213,706 |
2020 | 1,244,893 | 4,384,274 |
| 1,251,196 | 4,341,191 | 1,737,123 | 1,642,906 | 129 | 111 | 75,914 | 234,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Tony Sarsam (PEO1) joined the Company in September 2020. Dennis Eidson (PEO2) served as Interim CEO until September 2020.
The non-PEO NEOs represent the following individuals for each of the years shown, as follows:
2023 – Jason Monaco, David Sisk, Masiar Tayebi and Bennett Morgan.
2022 – Jason Monaco, Arif Dar, Yvonne Trupiano, Bennett Morgan, Thomas Swanson and Masiar Tayebi.
2021 – Jason Monaco, Mark Shamber, Kathleen Mahoney, Yvonne Trupiano, Arif Dar and Thomas Swanson.
2020 – Mark Shamber, Walt Lentz, Kathleen Mahoney, Yvonne Trupiano and Lori Raya.
(2) Amounts reported in this column represent (i) the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for Mr. Sarsam and Mr. Eidson and (ii) the average of the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for the Company’s NEOs other than Mr. Sarsam and Mr. Eidson.
(3) To calculate compensation actually paid, adjustments were made to the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. A reconciliation of the adjustments for each of the principal executive officers and for the average of the non-PEO NEOs is set forth following the footnotes to this table.
(4) Pursuant to Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2019. Historical stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
(5) The peer group TSR consists of the S&P SmallCap 600 Food Distributors Index, which is the same peer group used in Part II, Item 5 of our 2023 annual report.
(6) The Company selected Adjusted EBITDA as the Company Selected Measure as it believes Adjusted EBITDA most closely aligns compensation actually paid and Company financial performance. Under the annual cash incentive awards, Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net earnings plus interest, discontinued operations, depreciation and amortization, and other non-cash items including share-based payments (equity awards measured in accordance with ASC 718, Stock Compensation, which include both stock-based compensation to employees and stock warrants issued to non-employees) and the LIFO provision, as well as adjustments for items that do not reflect the ongoing operating activities of the Company. Pursuant to the approved terms of the 2023 AIP, the Committee may adjust for extraordinary items not
86 |
|
|
Executive Compensation
reflective of the Company’s ongoing operating activities. Accordingly, the Committee increased Adjusted EBITDA for legal and consulting fees related to the Company's exploration of potential acquisition targets during the year, which did not otherwise meet the criteria for adjustment to non-GAAP measures.
Reconciliation of Compensation Actually Paid Adjustments
The following tables present adjustments from the Summary Compensation Table totals to CAP for our PEOs and Non-PEO NEOs.
PEOs Summary Compensation Total to Compensation Actually Paid Reconciliation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
| Summary | Minus | Plus | Plus/(Minus) | Plus | Plus/(Minus) | Minus | Plus | Equals |
|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2023 |
| $9,977,490 | ($4,173,604) | $3,516,307 | ($562,270) | $— | ($167,421) | $— | $198,097 | $8,788,599 |
2022 |
| 9,743,982 | (1,816,634) | 1,934,332 | 308,986 | — | 224,013 | — | 83,004 | 10,477,683 |
2021 |
| 4,670,472 | (1,687,591) | 2,233,933 | 139,729 | — | 5,801 | — | 81,690 | 5,444,034 |
2020 |
| 5,629,167 | (1,061,499) | 388,452 | 57,906 | 624,533 | (50,467) | — | 4,295 | 5,592,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Non-PEO NEOs Summary Compensation Total to Compensation Actually Paid Reconciliation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
| Summary | Minus | Plus | Plus/(Minus) | Plus | Plus/(Minus) | Minus | Plus | Equals |
|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) | (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2023 |
| $2,076,269 | ($614,900) | $454,399 | ($71,878) | $— | ($26,945) | ($46,547) | $19,755 | $1,790,152 |
2022 |
| 1,782,208 | (222,500) | 169,737 | 32,011 | — | 31,207 | (114,233) | 2,826 | 1,681,256 |
2021 |
| 1,611,915 | (319,682) | 356,548 | 77,238 | — | 10,382 | (79,224) | 11,202 | 1,668,379 |
2020 |
| 1,737,123 | (276,290) | 176,078 | 42,581 | — | (10,028) | (32,399) | 5,841 | 1,642,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
Executive Compensation
Relationship Between Pay and Performance
Our executive compensation programs are designed to align pay with performance. Accordingly, the payouts under our annual and long-term incentive plans are based on attainment of certain company performance goals. As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section above, disclosure obligations for the Summary Compensation Table require inclusion of the earned value of long-term cash incentive awards and the grant date fair value of share-based awards (e.g., PSUs and restricted stock). For 2023, both the grant date fair value of PSUs granted in March 2023 and the earned payout value of the 2022 performance cash awards granted in March 2022 are reported in the same 2023 compensation row.
The table below lists financial measures which in our assessment represent the most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link executive compensation actually paid to the NEOs to company performance for 2023, the most recent fiscal year. The metrics used by the Company for our executive compensation programs are selected because they are aligned with the Company's long-term strategic plan and to incentivize both profitability and efficient utilization of invested capital. Please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for further information regarding how Adjusted EBITDA and ROIC are calculated and how they are used in our executive compensation program.
Most Important Financial Measures |
Adjusted EBITDA |
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (EPS) |
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) |
In accordance with SEC rules, the following illustrations provide a comparison of the information presented in the Pay Versus Performance table above. CAP is influenced by numerous factors, including but not limited to, the timing of new grant issuances and outstanding grant vesting, share price volatility during the fiscal year, our mix of short-term and long-term incentives, and other factors. The graphs below show the relationship between pay and performance by comparing PEO CAP and Non-PEO NEOs’ average CAP in relation to our cumulative TSR, peer group TSR, net income and our Company Selected Measure, Adjusted EBITDA.
88 |
|
|
Executive Compensation
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (cont’d)
89
|
|
|
|
The |
The Compensation Committee coordinates with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to evaluateevaluates whether the Company’s non-employee directors are fairly compensated for their services to the Company. Employee directors do not receive compensation for service as a director. In making director compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee is guided by three basic principles:
•
•
•
The Compensation Committee conducts periodic reviews of non-employee director compensation with these guiding principles in mind. TheFollowing a competitive market analysis, conducted by FW Cook, the Committee also reviewsdecided to increase the compensation survey dataprovided to directors to better align with current market practices. As part of the board refreshment process, the pay was increased to attract and retain talented directors, as follows:
The Company does not paypays meeting fees.fees of $1,500 per Board meeting only for full Board meetings in excess of 12 per year. The Board has established the following director compensation components and amounts:
structure for 2023 was as follows:
•
•
Lead Independent Director: additional $15,000 cash retainer;
Audit Committee Chair: $15,000$30,000 cash retainer;
•
•
•
•
•
Effective for fiscal 2016, the director annual equity award amount has been increased to $105,000 and the annual equity award paid to the nonexecutive ChairmanThe chairs of the Board was increased to $115,000.committees receive compensation from the chair cash retainer above, as well as compensation as members of the committees.
The Company has established stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors to help align the interests of directors with those of our shareholders. Under these guidelines, each director is expected to acquire and continue to hold shares of the Company’s common stock having an aggregate market value that equals or exceeds five times the rate of the regular annual retainer then in effect for non-employee directors who are not chairs. EachThe Company expects that each director is expected towill achieve the target ownership level within five years of becoming a director.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS (cont’d)
As of December 30, 2023, each of the Company’s non-employee directors had achieved the target ownership level or were making satisfactory progress toward the target levels and in compliance with the Company’s stock ownership policy. The following table provides information concerning the compensation of non-executivenon-employee directors for SpartanNash’s last completed fiscal year.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Name | Fees Earned Or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards(1)(2) ($) | Total(3) ($) | |||||||||
M. Shân Atkins | 80,000 | 88,889 | 168,889 | |||||||||
Mickey P. Foret | 95,000 | 88,889 | 183,889 | |||||||||
Dr. Frank M. Gambino | 72,500 | 88,889 | 161,389 | |||||||||
Douglas A. Hacker | 87,500 | 88,889 | 176,389 | |||||||||
Yvonne R. Jackson | 92,500 | 88,889 | 181,389 | |||||||||
Elizabeth A. Nickels | 72,500 | 88,889 | 161,389 | |||||||||
Timothy J. O’Donovan | 92,500 | 88,889 | 181,389 | |||||||||
Hawthorne L. Proctor | 72,500 | 88,889 | 161,389 | |||||||||
Craig C. Sturken | 150,000 | 88,889 | 238,889 | |||||||||
William R. Voss | 77,500 | 88,889 | 166,389 |
90 |
|
|
Compensation of Directors
2023 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
|
| |||
Name | Fees Earned | Stock | Total |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Shân Atkins |
| $142,500 |
| $162,895 |
| $305,395 |
|
Fred Bentley, Jr.(3) |
| — |
| 40,524 |
| 40,524 |
|
Douglas A. Hacker |
| 190,000 |
| 188,337 |
| 378,337 |
|
Kerrie D. MacPherson(4) |
| 22,500 |
| 79,454 |
| 101,954 |
|
Matthew M. Mannelly(5) |
| 68,750 |
| 162,895 |
| 231,645 |
|
Julien R. Mininberg |
| 110,000 |
| 162,895 |
| 272,895 |
|
Jaymin B. Patel |
| 125,000 |
| 162,895 |
| 287,895 |
|
Hawthorne L. Proctor |
| 112,500 |
| 162,895 |
| 275,395 |
|
Pamela S. Puryear, Ph.D. |
| 125,000 |
| 162,895 |
| 287,895 |
|
William R. Voss |
| 122,500 |
| 162,895 |
| 285,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the number of outstanding shares of restricted stock held by each non-employee director named above as of December 30, 2023:
| |||
Name | Shares of | ||
M. Shân Atkins | 5,980 | ||
Fred Bentley, Jr. | 1,842 | ||
Douglas A. Hacker | 6,914 | ||
Kerrie D. MacPherson | 3,739 | ||
Matthew M. Mannelly | — | ||
Julien R. Mininberg | 5,980 | ||
Jaymin B. Patel | 5,980 | ||
Hawthorne L. Proctor | 5,980 | ||
Pamela S. Puryear, Ph.D. | 5,980 | ||
William R. Voss | 5,980 | ||
91 |
|
|
Name | Shares of Restricted Stock Outstanding | Shares Underlying Options (Exercisable) | Shares Underlying Options (Non-Exercisable) | |||||||||
M. Shân Atkins | 3,348 | 9,462 | — | |||||||||
Mickey P. Foret | 3,348 | — | — | |||||||||
Dr. Frank M. Gambino | 3,348 | 4,786 | — | |||||||||
Douglas A. Hacker | 3,348 | — | — | |||||||||
Yvonne R. Jackson | 3,348 | — | — | |||||||||
Elizabeth A. Nickels | 3,348 | 9,462 | — | |||||||||
Timothy J. O’Donovan | 3,348 | 9,462 | — | |||||||||
Hawthorne L. Proctor | 3,348 | — | — | |||||||||
Craig C. Sturken | 3,348 | 29,000 | — | |||||||||
William R. Voss | 3,348 | — | — |
Mr. Hacker, Ms. Jackson, Mr. O’Donovan and Mr. Voss served as members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal 2015. None of the above members of the Compensation Committee was an officer or associate of SpartanNash or formerly an officer of SpartanNash. None of SpartanNash’s executive officers served as a member of a compensation committee (or Board committee performing a similar function) for another entity, or served as a director of another entity with an executive officer that serves on the SpartanNash Board of Directors.
Compensation Committee Report. The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the information provided under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in SpartanNash’s annual report on Form 10- K and proxy statement.
Respectfully submitted,
Yvonne R. Jackson, Chair
Douglas A. Hacker
Timothy J. O’Donovan
William R. Voss
SpartanNash recognizes that transactions with related persons can present potential or actual conflicts of interest. Accordingly, the Company has adopted written policies and procedures intended to ensure that potential conflicts of interests are identified, reviewed, approved, and disclosed as necessary. The Company has regular communications with related persons and relevant associatesAssociates regarding these policies.
It is the responsibility of SpartanNash’s management to conduct anestablish appropriate review ofcontrols and procedures to identify all material transactions with “related persons”related persons (as defined by Nasdaqin SEC Item 404 of Regulation S-K) and SEC rules)to evaluate those transactions for potential conflicts of interest situations on an ongoing basis. Pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5630 and the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee must evaluate and approve every proposed transaction with a related person. For any proposed transaction in which a director has an interest, SpartanNash’s general policy is that the director may proceed with the transaction only if the material facts of the transaction and the director’s interest in the transaction have been disclosed to the Audit Committee of the Board, the Audit Committee determines that the transaction is fair to SpartanNash, and the transaction is approved by the Audit Committee. There are no established criteria for evaluating such transactions, and the Audit Committee may consider any information or factors as it deems appropriate in making this determination. However, the Audit Committee may not determine that the proposed transaction is “fair” to the Company unless it determines that the transaction will be made on terms no less favorable than those offered generally to entities that are not affiliated with any director.
Directors and executive officers are required to complete an annual written questionnaire that solicits information regarding any direct or indirect interest that they or members of their family may have in any transaction or series of transactions involving the Company and having a value of $120,000 or more. Directors and executive officers are required to promptly update the Company of any change in the information provided by them in the questionnaire.
SpartanNash has adopted a written conflict of interest policy that requires all associatesAssociates to report actual and potential conflicts of interest to the Company’s internal auditor.
There were no related person transactions requiring disclosure under SEC rules during fiscal 20152023 or the current fiscal year to the date of this proxy statement.
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires SpartanNash’s directorseach director, officer, and officers and persons whoindividual beneficially ownowning more than 10% of the outstanding shares of SpartanNash common stocka registered security to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of shares of common stock with the SEC. Directors, officers and greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish SpartanNash with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file with the SEC. SpartanNashSEC, within specified time frames, initial statements of beneficial ownership (Form 3) and its legal counsel file Formsstatements of changes in beneficial ownership (Forms 4 and other reports under Section 16(a) on behalf of directors and executive officers to report transactions with the Company under our compensation and benefit plans.5). Based solely on our review ofsuch forms filed electronically with the copies of such reports received by us,SEC and with respect to the fiscal year ended December 30, 2023 or written representations from certainthat no additional forms were required, to the best of our knowledge, all required Section 16(a) filings were timely and correctly made by reporting persons that no reports on Form 5 were required for those persons for fiscal 2015, we believe that there have been no failures to timely file required reports by our directors and officers, except that on March 18, 2015 a Form 4 reporting a sale of shares by Major General (Ret.) Proctor was filed four business days late.2023.
92 |
|
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR INCLUSION IN THE PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE 2025 ANNUAL MEETING
Shareholder proposalsIn accordance with the rules established by the SEC, any shareholder proposal submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act intended to be presented at the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, whether or not intended to be includedfor inclusion in the proxy statement and formfor next year’s annual meeting of proxy relating to that meeting,shareholders must be received by the Company at its principal executive offices notno later than December 20, 2016. Shareholder proposals intended for consideration for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting should be made in accordance with SEC Rule 14a-8.
All shareholder proposals must comply with the notice provisions set forth in SpartanNash’s bylaws which require that a written notice of a proposal to be considered at the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting must be delivered to the Secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company not later than December 20, 2016, if11, 2024, assuming the meeting is held within 30 days of the calendar date of the 20162024 Annual Meeting. The proposal must comply fully with the requirements of Rule 14a-8.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE 2025 ANNUAL MEETING, BUT NOT FOR INCLUSION IN THE PROXY MATERIALS
In accordance with our bylaws, any shareholder proposal to be considered at next year’s annual meeting but not for inclusion in the event thatproxy statement must be delivered to our Corporate Secretary no later than December 11, 2024, assuming the date of the 2017 meeting changes by more thanis held within 30 days fromof the calendar date of the 20162024 Annual Meeting, written notice of a proposal must be delivered not more than seven days after the earlier of the date of the notice of the meeting. To be effective, such aMeeting. The notice must comply fully with the bylaws. You should address all shareholder proposals torequirements of the attention of our Secretary, 850 76th Street, S.W., P.O. Box 8700, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49518-8700.bylaws.
Shareholder Nominations of Director CandidatesSHAREHOLDER NOMINATIONS OF DIRECTOR CANDIDATES FOR THE 2025 ANNUAL MEETING
Under our restated articles of incorporation, a shareholder of record may nominate a person for election as a director at anext year’s annual meeting of shareholders at which directors will be elected if, and only if the shareholder has delivered timely notice to theour Corporate Secretary of SpartanNash setting forth:
•
•
•
•
•
To be timely, a shareholder’s notice must be delivered to our Corporate Secretary not later than December 11, 2024. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider every nominee proposed by a shareholder that is received in a timely manner in accordance with these procedures and report each such nomination, along with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendations, to the full Board of Directors.
To be timely, a shareholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at SpartanNash’s principal executive offices at least 120 days before the date of notice of the meeting in the case of an annual meeting of shareholders, or not more than seven days following the date of notice of the meeting in the case of a special meeting of shareholders.Board. Any nomination that does not comply with thesethe procedures set forth in our restated articles of incorporation will be void.
In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements, to comply with the SEC’s universal proxy rules, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Board’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than March 24, 2025.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also, in its discretion, consider shareholders’ informal recommendations of possible nominees. Shareholders may send such informal recommendations, including the candidate’s name and background information, to the Committee by directing them to SpartanNash in care of our Corporate Secretary.
All such notices, proposals, nominations and recommendations should be directed to the attention of our Corporate Secretary, Ileana McAlary, at SpartanNash Company, 850 76th Street, S.W., P.O. Box 8700, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49518-8700.
93 |
|
WHY AM I RECEIVING THESE MATERIALS?
The Board is providing this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card in connection with its solicitation of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting. For more information on the participants in the Board’s solicitation, please see “Participants” within the "Other Matters" section of this proxy statement.
WHO IS ENTITLED TO VOTE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?
You may vote at the Annual Meeting if you were a shareholder of record of SpartanNash common stock at the close of business on March 27, 2024, the record date for the Annual Meeting set by the Board. Each shareholder is entitled to one vote per share of SpartanNash common stock on each matter presented for a shareholder vote at the Annual Meeting. Shareholders do not have cumulative voting rights. As of the close of business on the record date, there were 34,465,355 shares of SpartanNash common stock outstanding.
WHAT MATTERS AM I VOTING ON?
You will be voting on:
HOW DOES THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMEND I VOTE ON THESE PROPOSALS?
The Board recommends voting on the enclosed proxy card:
94 |
|
Questions and Answers about the Proxy Materials and the Annual Meeting
HOW MANY VOTES ARE NEEDED FOR APPROVAL OF EACH PROPOSAL?
HOW DO I VOTE IF I AM A SHAREHOLDER OF RECORD?
If you are a shareholder of record (i.e., you own your shares directly on the books of our transfer agent and not through a bank, broker or other nominee), you may vote online or by phone, 24 hours a day, seven days a week (until the applicable deadline set forth below, except for votes at the Annual Meeting). You may also vote by mail if you requested and received printed copies of the proxy materials.
Online Voting. You may vote online by visiting www.proxyvote.com. You may navigate to the online voting site by entering your 8-digit control number. After receiving printed copies of the proxy materials, have your proxy card ready when you access the site and follow the prompts to record your vote. This vote will be counted immediately and there is no need to send in any proxy card you may have received. Except for any votes cast during the Annual Meeting, votes cast online must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 21, 2024.
Phone Voting. To vote by phone, dial 1-800-690-6903 and listen for further directions. You must have a touch-tone phone. Telephonic votes will be counted immediately and there is no need to send in your proxy card. Votes cast by phone must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 21, 2024.
Voting by Mail. Please properly date, sign and return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided in order to vote the shares represented by that proxy card at the Annual Meeting. Votes cast by mail must be received no later than the start of the Annual Meeting.
95 |
|
Questions and Answers about the Proxy Materials and the Annual Meeting
Voting at the Virtual Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held online via a live webcast at https://www.cesonlineservices.com/sptn24_vm. You may only participate in the virtual meeting by registering in advance at https://www.cesonlineservices.com/sptn24_vm prior to the deadline of 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 21, 2024. Please have your voting instruction form, proxy card or other communication containing your control number available and follow the instructions to complete your registration request. Upon completing registration, participants will receive further instructions via email, including unique links that will allow them to access the meeting.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT TO US. Please vote promptly online, by phone, or by mailing the enclosed proxy card, regardless whether you plan to attend the meeting. Voting your shares prior to the Annual Meeting will not affect your right to attend or vote at the meeting.
HOW DO I VOTE IF I AM A BENEFICIAL SHAREHOLDER WITH MY SHARES HELD IN STREET NAME?
If you hold your shares in “street name” (i.e., your shares are registered in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, which we will collectively reference as your “broker”), then you will receive voting instructions from your broker that you must follow in order to direct your broker on how to vote your shares. PLEASE USE THE VOTING FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED BY YOUR BROKER OR ITS AGENT. These forms and instructions typically permit you to give voting instructions by mail, phone or online. However, the availability of telephone and Internet voting will depend on the voting process of your broker. You will NOT be able to vote street name shares using the internet address or phone numbers established for shareholders of record as described above.
Please note that you may NOT vote shares held in street name at the Annual Meeting unless you request and receive a valid proxy from your broker, which must be presented as a PDF or image (.gif, .jpg or .png) file format with your online ballot during the Annual Meeting.
WHAT IS A PROXY?
A proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote the stock you own. That other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document is also called a proxy or a proxy card. Jason Monaco and Ileana McAlary have been designated as the Company’s proxy holders by our Board for the Annual Meeting. When proxies are properly dated, executed and returned, the shares represented by such proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the shareholder.
CAN I CHANGE MY VOTE OR REVOKE MY PROXY?
Yes. If you are a shareholder of record (i.e., you own your shares directly on the books of our transfer agent and not through a broker), you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by taking any of the following four actions:
Merely attending the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy; you must cast a vote at the Annual Meeting following the instructions you receive upon registration. Your last valid proxy or vote that we receive before or during the Annual Meeting is the proxy or vote that will be counted.
If you are a street name holder (i.e., your shares are registered in the name of a broker), and later want to change your vote, your broker can provide you with instructions on how to change your vote.
96 |
|
To support the Board’s nominees, you should vote “FOR” each of the Board’s nominees to be elected on the enclosed proxy card.
WHAT SHOULD I DO IF I RECEIVE MORE THAN ONE PROXY CARD OR SET OF PROXIESPROXY MATERIALS FROM THE COMPANY?
Your shares may be owned through more than one brokerage or other share ownership account. In order to vote all of the shares that you own, you must use each proxy card you receive in order to vote with respect to each account by telephone, by Internet, or by signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided.
The Company will likely conduct multiple mailings prior to the Annual Meeting to ensure shareholders have the Company’s latest proxy information and materials to vote. The Company will send you a new proxy card with each mailing, regardless of whether you have previously voted. We encourage you to vote every proxy card you receive. The latest dated proxy you submit will be counted, and, if you wish to vote as recommended by the Board, then vote "FOR" on Proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4 and "AGAINST" on Proposals 5 and 6.
WILL MY SHARES BE VOTED IF I DO NOTHING?
If you are a shareholder of record (i.e., you own your shares directly on the books of our transfer agent and not through a broker) and you do not cast your vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the items of business at the Annual Meeting.
If you are a street name holder (i.e., your shares are registered in the name of a broker), the New York Stock Exchange rules applicable to brokers determine whether your broker may vote your shares in its discretion even if it does not receive voting instructions from you.
If you are a street name holder and a broker provides you with the Company’s proxy materials, the broker may not vote your shares with respect to any of the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting unless you provide the broker with voting instructions. This is referred to as a “broker non-vote.” In these cases, those shares will not be considered votes cast on the proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting.
If you are a street name holder (in addition to the Company’s proxy materials), the broker may vote your shares in its discretion on “routine” matters when it does not receive voting instructions from you. With respect to “nonroutine” matters, the broker is not permitted to vote your shares without timely received voting instructions. At the Annual Meeting, the only “routine” matter proposed to be presented is the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent certified public accounting firm for fiscal 2024 (Proposal No. 3). Accordingly, broker non-votes will occur as to each of the other proposals presented at the Annual Meeting, which are considered “non-routine” matters. Such broker non-votes will not be considered votes cast on such proposals.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT TO US. Please vote promptly online, by phone, or by mailing the enclosed proxy card, regardless whether you plan to attend the meeting. Voting your shares prior to the Annual Meeting will not affect your right to attend or vote at the meeting.
You can revoke your proxy at any time before the proxy or proxies you appointed cast your votes. If you are a street name holder (i.e., your shares are registered in the name of a broker), and later want to change your vote, your broker can provide you with instructions on how to change your vote. You must follow these instructions in order for your shares to be voted. We urge you to instruct your broker or other nominee, by following the instructions on the enclosed voting instruction form, to vote your shares in line with the Board’s recommendations on the voting instruction form.
97 |
|
Questions and Answers about the Proxy Materials and the Annual Meeting
WHAT IS A QUORUM?
A quorum is the minimum number of shares required to be present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting to properly hold a meeting of shareholders and conduct business under our by-laws and Michigan law. Without a quorum, no business may be transacted at the Annual Meeting. The presence virtually or by properly executed proxy of the holders of a majority of the votes which may be cast at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum. We will initiallycount towards a quorum any abstentions, withhold votes, or broker non-votes.
HOW WILL THE ANNUAL MEETING BE CONDUCTED?
Our Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual format only. The Annual Meeting will be held online via a live webcast at https://www.cesonlineservices.com/sptn24_vm.
Only the Company’s shareholders as of the close of business on the record date for the Annual Meeting, their duly-appointed proxies and guests invited by the Company may attend the Annual Meeting. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person at a physical location. In order to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, you must pre-register at https://www.cesonlineservices.com/sptn24_vm prior to the deadline of 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 21, 2024. Please have your voting instruction form, proxy card or other communication containing your control number available and follow the instructions to complete your registration request. Upon completing registration, participants will receive further instructions via email, including unique links that will allow them to access the meeting. If you encounter any technical difficulties accessing the virtual Annual Meeting, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual meeting log-in page.
HOW CAN I ASK QUESTIONS DURING THE ANNUAL MEETING?
Shareholders may submit questions during the Annual Meeting by following the instructions they receive upon registration, as described above. Questions submitted during the meeting pertinent to meeting matters will be answered during the meeting, subject to time constraints. Additional information regarding the ability of shareholders to ask questions during the Annual Meeting will be included in the rules of conduct that will be available on the Annual Meeting website.
IF I CAN’T ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, CAN I VOTE LATER?
You do not need to attend the virtual Annual Meeting to vote if you submitted your vote via proxy in advance of the meeting. Whether or not shareholders plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge shareholders to vote and submit their proxy in advance of the Annual Meeting by one of the methods described in this proxy statement. Any votes submitted after the closing of the polls at the Annual Meeting will not be counted.
WHO WILL COUNT THE VOTES?
Morrow Sodali will serve as the independent inspector of election (the “Inspector of Election”) and, in such capacity, will count and tabulate the votes.
WHAT HAPPENS IF THE ANNUAL MEETING IS ADJOURNED?
The shareholders present at the meeting, virtually or by proxy, may, by a majority vote, adjourn the meeting despite the absence of a quorum. If a quorum is not present at the meeting, the Chairman of the meeting may adjourn the meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies in order to achieve a quorum. Unless a new record date is fixed, your proxy will still be valid at an adjourned Annual Meeting and you will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is used to vote your shares.
98 |
|
Questions and Answers about the Proxy Materials and the Annual Meeting
WHERE CAN I FIND THE VOTING RESULTS OF THE ANNUAL MEETING?
We intend to announce preliminary voting results based on the advice of our proxy solicitor at the Annual Meeting. We also expect to disclose preliminary voting results based on the preliminary tabulation by the Inspector of Election on a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting. We will report voting results based on the Inspector of Election’s final, certified report on a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the SEC as soon as practicable after the Annual Meeting.
WHO CAN HELP ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS I MAY HAVE?
If you have any questions or require any assistance with voting your shares, or if you need additional copies of the proxy materials, please contact our proxy solicitor:
MORROW SODALI LLC
Shareholders Call Toll Free: (800) 662-5200
Banks, Brokers, Trustees and Other Nominees Call Collect: (203) 658-9400
Email: SPTN@investor.morrowsodali.com
99 |
|
If any other matter properly comes before the Annual Meeting, shares represented by the enclosed proxy card will be voted in the discretion of the persons named as proxies on such card.
METHOD AND COST OF SOLICITING AND TABULATING VOTES
The Company will bear the expenses of calling and holding the Annual Meeting and the solicitation of proxies on behalf of our Board with respect to the Annual Meeting. These costs will include, among other items, the expense of preparing, assembling, printing, and mailing the proxy materials to shareholders of record and street name shareholders, and reimbursements paid to brokers for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy materials to shareholders and obtaining voting instructions from street name shareholders. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, our directors, officers, and certain regular employees may solicit proxies on behalf of the Board, without additional compensation, personally or by telephone. The regular employees will be administrative personnel. We may also solicit proxies by email from shareholders who are our employees or who previously requested to receive proxy materials electronically. The Company has retained Morrow Sodali to solicit proxies. Under our agreement with Morrow Sodali, Morrow Sodali will receive a fee of up to $15,000. Morrow Sodali expects that approximately 10 of its employees will assist in the solicitation. The Company also agreed to indemnify Morrow Sodali against certain liabilities relating to, or arising out of, its retention. Morrow Sodali will solicit proxies by mail, telephone, facsimile and email.
PARTICIPANTS
Under applicable regulations of the SEC, each of our directors and director nominees, and certain of our executive officers are “participants” in this proxy solicitation on behalf of the Board. For more information about our directors and executive officers, please see the “Board of Directors” and “SpartanNash’s Executive Officers” sections of this Proxy Statement. Other than the persons described in this proxy statement, no regular employees of the Company have been or are to be employed to solicit shareholders in connection with this proxy solicitation. However, in the course of their regular duties, certain administrative personnel may be asked to perform clerical or ministerial tasks in furtherance of this solicitation.
STOCKHOLDER LIST
The Company’s list of stockholders as of the close of business on March 27, 2024 will be available for inspection during the Annual Meeting by making ourshareholders who attend the Annual Meeting through the live webcast.
HOUSEHOLDING
We may deliver a single set of proxy materials to one address shared by two or more of our shareholders. This delivery method is referred to as “householding” and can result in significant cost savings. To take advantage of this opportunity, we have delivered only one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and one set of proxy materials to multiple shareholders who share an address, unless we received contrary instructions from the impacted shareholders prior to the mailing date. We agree to deliver promptly, upon written or verbal request, a separate copy of the proxy materials to any shareholder at the shared address to which a single copy of these documents was delivered. If you prefer to receive separate copies of these materials, contact Ileana McAlary, Corporate Secretary, at SpartanNash Company, 850 76th Street S.W., P.O. Box 8700, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49518-8700.
100 |
|
Other Matters
APPRAISAL RIGHTS
Shareholders do not have appraisal rights in connection with any matters proposed to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting.
ANNUAL REPORT AND SEC FILINGS
Our annual report to shareholders for fiscal 2023 is being furnished together with this proxy statement. The annual report is currently available for reviewing online by clicking the “Annual Reports” link in the “Investor Relations” section of our website, www.spartannash.com. Additionally, the Company’s filings with the SEC are available to the public at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Copies will also be available at no charge by clicking the “SEC Filings” link in the “Investor Relations” section of our website, www.spartannash.com, or by contacting IR@spartannash.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The information on the Internet. In addition, directors, officersSEC’s website and associatesthe Company’s website are not part of SpartanNash and its subsidiaries may solicit proxies by telephone or facsimile or in person without additional compensation. Proxies may be solicited by nominees and other fiduciaries who may mail materials to or otherwise communicate with the beneficial owners of shares held by them. We will bear all costs of the preparation and solicitation of proxies, including the charges and expenses of brokerage firms, banks, trustees or other nominees for forwardingthis proxy material to beneficial owners. We have engaged Georgeson Inc. at an estimated cost of $7,500, plus expenses and disbursements, to assist in solicitation of proxies.statement.
By Order of the Board of DirectorsBY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Kathleen M. MahoneyIleana McAlary
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer
and Corporate Secretary
Grand Rapids, Michigan
April 19, 201610, 2024
101 |
|
Reconciliation of Net Earnings to Adjusted Earnings
Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization
(Adjusted EBITDA)
(A Non-GAAP Financial Measure)
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
(In thousands, except percentages) | 2023 |
| 2022 |
| 2021 | |||
Net sales | $ | 9,729,219 |
| $ | 9,643,100 |
| $ | 8,931,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings | $ | 52,237 |
| $ | 34,518 |
| $ | 73,751 |
Income tax expense |
| 17,888 |
|
| 12,397 |
|
| 24,906 |
Other expenses, net |
| 36,587 |
|
| 21,629 |
|
| 13,543 |
Operating earnings |
| 106,712 |
|
| 68,544 |
|
| 112,200 |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFO expense |
| 16,104 |
|
| 56,823 |
|
| 18,652 |
Depreciation and amortization |
| 98,639 |
|
| 94,180 |
|
| 92,711 |
Acquisition and integration, net |
| 3,416 |
|
| 343 |
|
| 708 |
Restructuring and asset impairment, net |
| 9,190 |
|
| 805 |
|
| 2,886 |
Cloud computing amortization |
| 5,034 |
|
| 3,650 |
|
| 2,140 |
Organizational realignment, net |
| 5,239 |
|
| 1,859 |
|
| 589 |
Severance associated with cost reduction initiatives |
| 318 |
|
| 831 |
|
| 423 |
Stock-based compensation |
| 12,536 |
|
| 8,589 |
|
| 6,975 |
Stock warrant |
| 1,559 |
|
| 2,158 |
|
| 1,958 |
Non-cash rent |
| (2,599) |
|
| (3,444) |
|
| (4,059) |
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
| 259 |
|
| 1,073 |
|
| (106) |
Legal settlement |
| 900 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
Postretirement plan amendment and settlement |
| 94 |
|
| 133 |
|
| — |
Costs related to shareholder activism |
| — |
|
| 7,335 |
|
| — |
Paid time off transition adjustment |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (21,371) |
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 257,401 |
| $ | 242,879 |
| $ | 213,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin |
| 2.65% |
|
| 2.52% |
|
| 2.39% |
102 |
|
SPARTANNASH COMPANY
2024 Stock INCENTIVE PLAN
Section 1. Purpose
The purpose of the Plan is to promote the interests of the Company and its shareholders by aiding the Company in attracting and retaining employees, officers, consultants, independent contractors and non‑employee Directors capable of assuring the future success of the Company, to offer such persons incentives to put forth maximum efforts for the success of the Company’s business and to afford such persons an opportunity to acquire an ownership interest in the Company, thereby aligning the interests of such persons with the Company’s shareholders.
Section 2. Definitions
As used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:
103 |
| |||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
Appendix B: SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q
104 |
|
Appendix B: SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
105 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For | Against | Abstain | For | Against | Abstain | |||||||||||||||
2. | Say on Pay - Advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation. | ¨ | ¨ | ¨ | 3. | Proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors for the current fiscal year. | ¨ | ¨ | ¨ |
Appendix B: SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
Section 3. Administration
106 |
|
Appendix B: SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan, all designations, determinations, interpretations and other decisions under or with respect to the Plan or any Award or Award Agreement shall be within the sole discretion of the Committee, may be made at any time and shall be final, conclusive and binding upon any Participant, any holder or beneficiary of any Award or Award Agreement, and any employee of the Company or any Affiliate.
107 |
|
Appendix B: SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
Section 4. Shares Available for Awards
108 |
|
Appendix B: SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
Section 5. Eligibility
Any Eligible Person shall be eligible to be designated as a Participant. In determining which Eligible Persons shall receive an Award and the terms of any Award, the Committee may take into account the nature of the services rendered by the respective Eligible Persons, their present and potential contributions to the success of the Company or such other factors as the Committee, in its discretion, shall deem relevant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Incentive Stock Option may only be granted to full time or part time employees (which term as used herein includes, without limitation, officers and Directors who are also employees), and an Incentive Stock Option shall not be granted to an employee of an Affiliate unless such Affiliate is also a “subsidiary corporation” of the Company within the meaning of Section 424(f) of the Code or any successor provision.
Section 6. Awards
109 |
|
Appendix B: SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
110 |
|
Appendix B: SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
111 |
|
Appendix B: SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
Nothing in this Section 6 shall limit the authority of the Committee to amend or modify any Award to accelerate the vesting or the exercisability of any Award or the lapse of any restrictions relating to any Award, including, without limitation, upon a termination of employment, a Change in Control or as otherwise determined by the Committee.
Section 7. Amendment and Termination; Corrections
112 |
|
Appendix B: SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
For greater certainty and except for equitable adjustments as provided in Section 4(c), prior approval of the shareholders of the Company shall be required for any amendment to the Plan or an Award that would:
113 |
|
Appendix B: SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
Section 8. Income Tax Withholding
In order to comply with all applicable federal, state, local or foreign income tax laws or regulations, the Company may take such action as it deems appropriate to ensure that all applicable federal, state, local or foreign payroll, withholding, income or other taxes, which are the sole and absolute responsibility of a Participant, are withheld or collected from such Participant. Without limiting the foregoing, and solely for avoidance of doubt, the Committee, in its discretion and subject to such additional terms and conditions as it may adopt, may permit the Participant to satisfy such tax obligation by (a) electing to have the Company withhold a portion of the Shares otherwise to be delivered upon exercise or receipt of (or the lapse of restrictions relating to) such Award with a Fair Market Value equal to the amount of such taxes (subject to applicable law and any limitations required by ASC Topic 718 to avoid adverse accounting treatment); (b) delivering to the Company Shares other than Shares issuable upon exercise or receipt of (or the lapse of restrictions relating to) such Award with a Fair Market Value equal to the amount of such taxes; or (c) by any other means set forth in the applicable Award Agreement.
Section 9. General Provisions
114 |
|
Appendix B: SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan
Section 10. Clawback or Recoupment
In addition to such forfeiture and/or penalty conditions as specified in any Award Agreement, Awards under this Plan shall be subject to forfeiture or other penalties pursuant the SpartanNash Company Clawback Policy as amended from time to time.
Section 11. Effective Date of the Plan
The Plan was adopted by the Board on March 5, 2024. The Plan shall be subject to approval by the shareholders of the Company at the annual meeting of shareholders of the Company to be held on the Shareholder Approval Date and the Plan shall be effective as of the date of such shareholder approval. On and after shareholder approval of the Plan, no awards shall be granted under the Prior Plan, but all outstanding awards previously granted under the Prior Plan shall remain outstanding and subject to the terms of the Prior Plan.
Section 12. Term of the Plan
No Award shall be granted under the Plan, and the Plan shall terminate, on the tenth anniversary of the Shareholder Approval Date or any earlier date of discontinuation or termination established pursuant to Section 7(a) of the Plan. Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or in an applicable Award Agreement, any Award theretofore granted may extend beyond such dates, and the authority of the Committee provided for hereunder with respect to the Plan and any Awards, and the authority of the Board to amend the Plan, shall extend beyond the termination of the Plan.
115 |
|
SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTEw SPARTANNASH COMPANYC/O INVESTOR RELATIONS VOTE BY INTERNET 850 76TH STREET SW Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above P.O. BOX 8700 Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49518-8700 until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 21, 2024. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 21, 2024. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we haveprovided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY11717. Votes cast by mail must be received no later than the start of the Annual Meetingof Shareholders. VOTING AT THE VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS You may only participate in the virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders by registeringin advance at https://www.cesonlineservices.com/sptn24_vm prior to the deadline of 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 21, 2024. Please have your control number availableand follow the instructions to register. Upon completing registration, you will receive anemail with a unique link that will allow access to the meeting. V42895-P09663 SPARTANNASH COMPANY The Board of Directors recommends you vote FORthe following: 1.Election of Eight Directors Nominees:ForWithhold 1a.M. Shân Atkins!!The Board of Directors recommends you vote FORForAgainstAbstainproposal 3. 3.Approval of the SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock 1b.Fred Bentley, Jr.!!!!! Incentive Plan. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR 1c.Douglas A. Hacker!!ForAgainstAbstain proposal 4. 4.Ratification of Selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the 1d.Kerrie D. MacPherson !!Company's Independent Certified Public Accounting Firm!!! for Fiscal 2024. 1e.Julien R. Mininberg!!The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST ForAgainstAbstainproposal 5. 1f.Jaymin B. Patel!!5.Shareholder proposal regarding a simple majority vote, !!! if properly presented at the Annual Meeting. 1g.Pamela S. Puryear, Ph.D.The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST ForAgainstAbstain !! proposal 6. 1h.Tony B. Sarsam6.Shareholder proposal regarding animal welfare, if properly !!!!! presented at the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FORForAgainstAbstainNOTE: The proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion on proposal 2.such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. 2.Advisory Approval of the Company’s Named Executive !!! Officer Compensation. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appearsappear(s) hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian,other fiduciary, please give full title.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the |
02A03C
2016 Annual Meeting Admission Ticket
2016Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement, Annual Shareholders Meeting of
SpartanNash Company
Thursday, June 2, 2016, 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time
JW Marriott Hotel Grand Rapids
235 Louis St. NW, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503
Admission Ticket Information
SpartanNash Company will be holding itsReport and Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com. V42896-P09663 SPARTANNASH COMPANY THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Annual Meeting of Shareholders on June 2, 2016.May 22, 2024 10:00 AM EDT The Company’s proxy statement provides information regardingshareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Ileana McAlary and Jason Monaco, or either of them, as proxies, each with the matters that are expectedpower to be votedappoint (his/her) substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on at the meeting. Your vote is important to us. Even if you plan to attend the meeting, please read the enclosed materials and vote through the Internet, by telephone or by mailing the Proxy Card below.
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, you will need to present this ticket or your notice of availability of proxy materials and photo identification to gain entrance to the meeting.
PLEASE NOTE THAT GIFT BAGS, PRODUCT SAMPLES AND REFRESHMENTS ARE NO LONGER OFFERED AT THE MEETING. THERE WILL NOT BE A BUSINESS PRESENTATION AT THE MEETING.
Upon arrival, please present this admission ticket or your notice of availability of proxy materials and photo identification at the registration desk.You should send in your proxy or vote electronically even if you plan to attend the meeting.
Telephone and Internet Voting.
On the reverse side of this card are instructions on how to vote through the Internet or by telephone. Please consider voting through oneballot, all of these methods. Your vote is recorded as if you mailed in your Proxy. We believe voting through the Internet or by telephone is convenient, and it also saves money.
Thank you in advance for your participation in our 2016 Annual Meeting.
SpartanNash Company
q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q
Proxy — SpartanNash Company
Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
JW Marriott Hotel Grand Rapids
235 Louis St. NW
Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503
Proxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting – June 2, 2016
Dennis Eidson and David M. Staples, or either of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote the shares of Common Stock of SpartanNash Company that the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present,shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 10:00 AM EDT on Wednesday, May 22, 2024, virtually at https://www.cesonlineservices.com/sptn24_vm, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE SHAREHOLDER(S). IF NO SUCH DIRECTIONS ARE MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, FOR PROPOSALS 2, 3, AND 4, AND AGAINST PROPOSALS 5 AND 6. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE. Continued and to be signed on reverse side
Your Vote Counts! SPARTANNASH COMPANY 2024 Annual Meeting Vote by May 21, 2024 11:59 PM EDT SPARTANNASH COMPANY C/O INVESTOR RELATIONS 850 76TH STREET SW P.O. BOX 8700 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49518-8700 V42898-P09663 You invested in SPARTANNASH COMPANY and it’s time to vote! You have the right to vote on proposals being presented at the Annual Meeting of SpartanNash CompanyShareholders. This is an important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the virtual meeting to be held on June 2, 2016May 22, 2024. Get informed before you vote View the Notice and Proxy Statement, Annual Report and Form 10-K online OR you can receive a free paper or at any postponement email copy of the material(s) by requesting prior to May 8, 2024. If you would like to request a copy of the material(s) for this and/or adjournment thereof.
future shareholder meetings, you may (1) visit www.ProxyVote.com, (2) call 1-800-579-1639 or (3) send an email to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com. If this Proxy is properly executed,sending an email, please include your control number (indicated below) in the shares represented by this Proxysubject line. Unless requested, you will be voted as directed by the shareholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authoritynot otherwise receive a paper or email copy. For complete information and to vote, FORvisit www.ProxyVote.com Control # Smartphone users Point your camera here and vote without entering a control number Vote Virtually at the electionAnnual Meeting of all nominees named on this proxy as directors, and FORShareholders* May 22, 2024 10:00 AM EDT Virtually at: https://www.cesonlineservices.com/sptn24_vm *Please check the approvalmeeting materials for any special requirements for meeting attendance.
Vote at www.ProxyVote.com THIS IS NOT A VOTABLE BALLOT This is an overview of the proposals identified in this Proxy.
In their discretion,being presented at the Proxiesupcoming Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Please follow the instructions on the reverse side to vote these important matters. Board Recommends Voting Items 1. Election of Eight Directors Nominees: 1a. M. Shân Atkins For 1b. Fred Bentley, Jr. For 1c. Douglas A. Hacker For 1d. Kerrie D. MacPherson For 1e. Julien R. Mininberg For 1f. Jaymin B. Patel For 1g. Pamela S. Puryear, Ph.D. For 1h. Tony B. Sarsam For 2. Advisory Approval of the Company’s Named Executive Officer Compensation. For 3. Approval of the SpartanNash Company 2024 Stock Incentive Plan. For 4. Ratification of Selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s Independent Certified Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal 2024. For 5. Shareholder proposal regarding a simple majority vote, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting. Against 6. Shareholder proposal regarding animal welfare, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting. Against NOTE: The proxies are authorized to vote uponin their discretion on such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
(Itemsmeeting or any adjournment thereof. Prefer to receive an email instead? While voting on www.ProxyVote.com, be voted appear on reverse side.)
This card also serves as voting directionsure to Fidelity Management Trust Company (“Fidelity”), as trustee of the SpartanNash Company Savings Plus Plan and the SpartanNash Company Savings Plus Plan for Union Associates. Shares held in these plans will be voted by Fidelity as directed by the plan participants. Unless otherwise required by law, shares for which Fidelity has not received voting instructions by three business days prior to the meeting date will not be voted.click “Delivery Settings”. V42899-P09663